@chrischirp
Q: What *exactly* does "70.4% effectiveness" mean?
Does it mean 70.4% will gain total immunity no matter how huge the viral load / number of exposures?
Or does it mean, everyone gets a bit of an immune boost, so an individual needs 100÷(100-70.4)=3.37 x as..
Q: What *exactly* does "70.4% effectiveness" mean?
Does it mean 70.4% will gain total immunity no matter how huge the viral load / number of exposures?
Or does it mean, everyone gets a bit of an immune boost, so an individual needs 100÷(100-70.4)=3.37 x as..
..big a viral load to succumb (or 3.37 x as many encounters).
This is a genuine question and the answer has big implications for the UK.
Because it seems like the Gov policy is to deliberately raise a child army of covid vectors and unleash them.
As I understand it
This is a genuine question and the answer has big implications for the UK.
Because it seems like the Gov policy is to deliberately raise a child army of covid vectors and unleash them.
As I understand it
"effectiveness" is calculated by comparing infection rate in say 50K vaccinated and 50K unvacfinated people in the same community, ie the same exposure profile... what happens when the government throws virus-bomb into the population, creating artificially high exposure?
I don't know if this has ever been tested (though native Americans and "smallpox blankets" comes to mind) but I guess we are about to find out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
