Yesterday we learned Jim Biden was up to stuff in Turkey and talking to Altepkin. Just like woolsey was trying to yarn his own deal with turkey....then ran and "tattle tailed" on Flynn....to Biden of course...
Then according to notes taken at the same time as the Flynn case was supposed to be shut down, Biden mentions the logan act, and Woolsey announces his departure from the trump camp the next day?
And think about this: woolsey came in as CIA director in 1993, the same time Freeh took over FBI. I wonder how close those two asshats are? Both balls deep in Biden Inc.😠
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(2/2) while the government tip-toes around the truth, they reveal through alams own notes to self that he wasn't there to support Trump. So let's just end the charade that this $hitshow was entirely instigated by Trump supporters.
There is definitely some obfuscation going on with this Schiff/Apple subpeona story. First the nyt's reports they were in 2017 and 2018. Then they let out that the gag order was renewed annually 3 times ending this late spring, meaning this originated in the late spring 2017.
Which matters cause laufman and van grack had their hands in the cookie jar back then.
Then last night Del Quentin a prolific FBI mouthpiece starts trying to sell us the GJ issued the subpoena in Feb 2018, lining up convienently with laufman's son departure.
My guess is he's trying to throw shade and keep the trump doj narrative going when in reality the whole debacle start to finish was really in the hands of career doj swamp with no interest in real answers.
The original Schiff et al subpoenas were issued in 2017 under someone tasked at NSD with the leak investigations.
According to the slimes the gag order only expired last month (may ?)
Are gag orders generally annualized?
My point is no one has specified WHEN in 2017 these subpoenas were first initiated. If it was April or May of 2017 that's significant. We know the leaking got bad in March/April of 2017. Why is this important?👇
(1/3) Why are they only asking Barr? The subpoenas were issued in 2017 and 2018. The likely person briefed to OK was Rosenstein. Perhaps you should ask him.
(2/3) Don't forget Rosenstein himself threatened Kash Patel and other Republican members of the Intel committee. You think he only went after one side😂
I like @jsolomonReports , I follow him, listen to his podcasts, he's set himself apart from the msm. But he's been completely awol like everybody else in relation to SR.
You don't have to jump to the conclusion that SR actually leaked to wikileaks or xyz had him killed. You just need to focus on the basic questions no one will answer almost five years later to realize something is being hidden and start asking , WHY?
Last night I had a dream that I met John Durham....
He was a proff dept at the college where I did my undergrad. He was supposed to be investigating a scandal there and everyone was abuzz about it, but no one had seen him for months....
Then I went to interview at graduate schools, one of which was a big rival. When I got there I found out Durham had been working there the whole time, and everybody knew it, but no one there really cared because, meh, it was a scandal at another school....