Share this page!

A.R. Moxon Profile picture
Twitter logo
7 Jul, 4 tweets, 2 min read
“CRT is Orwellian and that’s why I think there should be constant video monitoring of teachers to be sure they don’t teach the badthink.”
“I hate ‘cancel culture’ in schools, which is why I think we should have nonstop video monitoring of teachers, so we can fire the ones who say the badthink to our white children.”
The anti-wokers have discovered these tweets, and I was going to invite them to remain insanely angry about the threat of hearing uncomfortable truths, but let me assure you they have got it *covered.*
I see we’ve left behind the “how dare you teach that our perfect country has a legacy of genocide?” talking point and progressed to the “actually we should be proud of our legacy of genocide” talking point.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

A.R. Moxon Profile picture
6 Jul
Abusers tend to cultivate enabling friends in order to lend themselves a veneer of innocence. I know…this is an inconvenient truth.
Our goal should not be tolerance. Our goal should be justice.

But even setting that aside, this framing misunderstands what tolerance is.
Tolerance isn’t friendship. Tolerance is the bare minimum of justice. It’s permitting people to exist as equals under the law even if you find their beliefs or very existence offensive.

On almost every metric, Republicans fail the test of tolerance.
Read 10 tweets
A.R. Moxon Profile picture
3 Jul
The Supreme Court's rulings systemically dismantling voting rights are constitutional negation. They present an argument for Biden and Congress to ignore an unlawful Supreme Court.
If the Supreme Court is going to act as a confederate council for an authoritarian party that is negating our constitution, then as a body they have invalidated themselves; it's no longer the Supreme Court of the constitution but the unconstitutional Roberts Court.
It's the duty of those who swore an oath to protect the constitution to negate the unconstitutional Roberts Court and install a new one.

That's the framing I'd like to see used on the Sunday shows. Let's get real with it.
Read 6 tweets
A.R. Moxon Profile picture
1 Jul
Climate change is upon us and it is an existential emergency.

It requires an emergency footing response that is transformative, sweeping, and immediate.

We should abolish or replace any institution or entity that chooses to stand between us and such a response.
For example: “But we can’t pass meaningful for climate reform because of the Senate” is an argument to abolish the Senate, not an argument to stop pursuing climate reform.
Realize that whatever reason one would give for not passing immediate radical sweeping climate change policy is an argument for abolishing, purging, removing or replacing that thing.
Read 5 tweets
A.R. Moxon Profile picture
30 Jun
It’s totally expected but still the effortless speed with which conservatives flip from “we aren’t allowed to say anything anymore!!” to “here are all the things you’re literally not allowed to say” is always breathtaking.
“We’re being censored by woke cancel culture! We’re afraid to say what we actually think!—also here is our new law forbidding mention of the following topics in public schools.”
lol, literally a laundry list of things these "woke cancel culture is coming for my free speech" warriors want to not allow to be said
Read 5 tweets
A.R. Moxon Profile picture
29 Jun
problem
it
order
Read 12 tweets
A.R. Moxon Profile picture
29 Jun
Just read an article that amounts to “because of gerrymandering, vote suppression, propaganda, and anti-democracy efforts, if Democrats want to win elections, they must nominate candidates who won’t fight gerrymandering, vote suppression, propaganda, and anti-democracy efforts.”
Parts of this country are going to start seeing climate refugees from places like Florida and I really think we ought to rethink our hypercapitalist society that consumes people for profit and uses militarized authoritarian violence to enforce itself before we get there.
To me that seems like we're going to need to nominate some unconventional candidates who are willing to fight the status quo but idk.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @JuliusGoat has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @JuliusGoat!

Read all threads by @JuliusGoat

:(