So @cenkuygur made a video last night purporting to respond to me that's so unhinged he's trending and being attacked by his own viewers. *Amazingly*, he 100% ignored the main point that caused me to weigh in: they falsely accused a journalist of being "paid by the Russians":👇
Cenk can rant and rave and sweat and breath as heavily as he wants and it will never erase what he and @TheYoungTurks shamefully did. All his sweat cannot distract from the only issue that matters: they fabricated serious accusations against a journalist:
As for the new costume Cenk is donning -- stalwart defender of women -- remember that his own group, @justicedems, kicked him out for past misogyny, and @BernieSanders had to retract his endorsement for Cenk's Congressional run, when he came in like 18th place with 14 votes:
To the extent I had any other point beyond Cenk & Ana's fabrications about people working for Russians, it was exactly that: the cynical weaponization of sexual harassment and feminism to destroy critics. See for yourself the workplace they created to decide if they're genuine:
Anyway, that's the last I'm going to say about this. For anyone who saw Cenk's outburst and is interested in what I actually said -- and to see how Cenk made a whole video that completely ignored the primary critique of them -- you can see it here:
As I said, the only reason I weighed in on any of this is because those two tactics -- falsely but casually accusing people of being paid Russian agents and cynically weaponizing accusations of sexual misconduct -- are so common in liberal politics: as common as they are toxic.
More importantly: the above TYT videos were created by the pro-Bernie, leftist videographer @0rf, who is on the verge of being removed from YouTube thanks to the censorship regime urged by liberal journalists. They are destroying internet freedom. Read:
This is American liberalism right here: in its purest expression.
One of MSNBC's most popular hosts - a former Bush/Cheney spokesperson - devotes a whole segment to defending NSA and lamenting distrust in it. She brings on 2 ex-FBI officials, who now work for MSNBC, to do it:
The political faction that is pro-FBI, pro-NSA, pro-CIA -- and whose media is delivered to them by a mix of security state officials, ex Bush/Cheney operatives, and neocons -- is American liberalism.
Just watch that clip to see the authoritarianism of this movement.
If having your newsrooms filled with ex-security state operatives, FBI agents, CIA officials, and Generals -- all of whom are paid employees -- to reflexively defend the FBI, CIA and NSA isn't "State TV," what is?
Pretty sure I'll be watching that montage in my 80s and enjoying it just as much as I did the first 100 times I saw it.
Remember when Rachel Maddow was so excited she got Avenatti to come on the air to talk about his secret client, Julie Swetnick, who had utterly unhinged and dubious allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, and Maddow treated it as an earth-shattering scoop?
AOC and two other Squad members -- who spent months chanting "Defund the Police" -- had the power to stop this. They originally agreed to vote "no," but instead voted "present" at the last minute to avoid angering Pelosi. @AOC was particularly craven here:
The unleashing of a newly empowered law enforcement and "intelligence" agency now spreading to other states, commanded by Congress, has been enabled by one tactic: the weaponization and exaggeration of the events of January 6 and the supposed grave domestic threat it reflects.
Tucker Carlson adds more specifics and more reporting to corroborate his claim that the NSA was not just spying on his email communications but using them to leak to reporters. I'll be on tonight at 8 pm ET discussing these claims.
The media dynamic we're seeing here is the same as with the Julian Assange prosecution. You would expect journalists to lead the way in denouncing the prosecution of a journalist and wanting answers to whether the NSA spied on another journalist. But they don't do either.
One reason is they are petty hacks who can't see principle: they don't regard Assange or Carlson as one of them & thus don't care what's done to them.
But the real reason is they're authoritarians: they revere DOJ & NSA - the security state - and thus reflexively side with it.
Eu me pergunto se a pessoa que falsificou este documento foi a mesma que falsificou o documento bitcoin - pretendendo mostrar que paguei hackers russos - postado por o Pavão Misterioso porque muitos dos principais erros são exatamente os mesmos.
Depois que @Biakicis promoveu o documento bitcoin forjado do Pavão, eu postei este, onde você pode ver muitos dos mesmos erros do documento CPI falso com muita clareza:
As House Republicans vocally denounce Big Tech in media appearances, many simultaneously use their power to impede legislative reform.
I spoke with @RepKenBuck about what explains this disparity between their words and actions and what needs to be done.
The politics of antitrust legislation to finally reform Silicon Valley monopoly power has been fascinating and confusing. Many Dems -- who receive large funding from Big Tech -- join with GOP lawmakers who still oppose government efforts. Meanwhile, a bipartisan coalition grows.