This nut graph from @jackstripling's story on what happened with Nikole Hannah-Jones and UNC is the key. University leadership is clearly cowed by the Board. This is a pattern at this school. chronicle.com/article/how-ch…
I have no doubt that the radical activist Board of the UNC system makes it very hard to lead the flagship campus, but leadership means leading, and sometimes that means risking one's job to do the right thing.
You can't speak of the high minded values of your university and then fail to stand behind those values in the face of a challenge, even when that challenge comes from your own board. I'm sure UNC leadership is worried about what damage the Board can do, but...
...it's clear that there is no end to the damage these bad actors will wreak on the university. Silence isn't an option. It's a responsibility of leadership. If you can't fulfill that, get out of the job.
It's entirely possible, maybe even probable that standing up to the Board and forcing a confrontation over the values will cause a larger controversy, but my guess and my hope is that a majority of folks would come down on the side of those values and against the board.
The UNC Board is determined to bring their state institutions to heel under the rule of minority power. Too much capitulation has already happened and it's blown up every time. You can manage your way out of this stuff. You have to lead.
I read the statements of the UNC Chancellor as an attempt to cajole, or lightly shame the Board, but it clearly has no effect. The end result is essentially pablum that those focused on achieving power can ignore. unc.edu/posts/2021/07/…
The lack of leadership is ultimately what put NHJ off joining the faculty, for good reason.
I'm sure the UNC Chancellor wants nothing but the best for his school, but this ain't going to get it done.
On her way to Howard, @nhannahjones painted a picture of what leadership would look like at UNC. Maybe they should lure her back as Chancellor. naacpldf.org/press-release/…
Getting a couple of DM's about the "impossible" situation that UNC leadership was in, and I don't discount how fraught the whole deal was, but NHJ was in an impossible position and she navigated through by being true to her values. Leadership means accepting risk.
Yes, easy for a guy who has no position the requires leadership to say, but my career in higher ed was ultimately made impossible because too many leaders acted like managers, rather than leaders, allowing for the erosion of their institutions.
The defensive crouch to limit the abuse from malevolent actors has not been kind to public institutions. I believe that universities doing what we know they can and do do and living those values will garner strong majority support of the public.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "don't poke the bear" approach described here is a dynamic in many states and many state systems and I agree, it hasn't worked. At some point, the community needs to come together and have it out. This is leadership. dailytarheel.com/article/2021/0…
College of Charleston's board hired one of the bears (one of the most powerful state politicians), Glenn McConnell, over the recommendations of a search firm and wishes of faculty and students. It didn't help. He was a non-existent leader and the budget didn't budge.
U. South Carolina had Robert Caslen, former superintendent of West Point, installed as President by the Republican governor/legislature. He was an utter failure because he was put in a position which made it impossible for him to bring the community together.
In grade school in the 1970's I was exposed to anti-smoking education to prevent me from harming myself and others. I then went home and agitated until my parents quit smoking. Didn't realize I was a little totalitarianist.
The attitude that parents have literal ownership of (as opposed to responsibility for) their children is interesting to me and perhaps telling when it comes to these current school-related culture war debates. Related to this push to video teachers.
I'm sympathetic to the fear parents have for their children's well-being, but I'm also a big believer in education as a process and school as a place for students to develop agency and self-concept, which may diverge from their parents' belief.
Do people really read Coddling of the American Mind as a defense of free speech principles? It explicitly takes the speech of students and turns it into a psychological disorder. Hard to imagine a less friendly stance to free speech/inquiry.
Making a book length case that students shouldn’t be listened to because they’re gripped by a psychological disorder because the students disagree with the professors at elite universities does speak to someone being coddled, but it ain’t college students.
It is unsurprising that elite academics and public writer types think Coddling is a good diagnosis. It flatters those groups and puts their opinions (and feelings) above other groups. We can’t have students yelling at professors, don’t you know.
For those who don't want to believe that Coddling the American Mind was the gateway to the current right wing freakout targeting free speech and academic freedom at public universities, look at how those right wingers revere the book. chronicle.com/article/presid…
I've got a blog post I'm trying to land on this topic. It's tough to get at exactly what I want to argue, but essentially, it's always been a power struggle. Student questioning problems of access and equity made some faculty uncomfortable, so they worked to silence them.
Go back in time and look at how student protest was responded to circa 2015-2016. The substance was never discussed. It was always an attempt to police how students were protesting. They weren't doing it correctly according to the people in charge.
This whole students are coddled, anti-trigger warning, anti student protest thing that's metastasized into the anti-anti-racism movement that's coming for public higher ed was just supposed to be a little internecine culture battle for primacy in elite colleges.
Faculty at elite privates got a little salty about how they were being checked by administrators/bureaucracy over issues of diversity combined with the rise of students agitating over these issues. It was looking like they may have to change the status quo.
Quelling that unrest meant pathologizing student protestors as defective and their protests therefore as unjustified. The substance of what students were protesting over was almost never discussed. They were just said to be doing it wrong by those in power.
The part of Summer of Soul where the guy talks about seeing Marilyn McCoo on stage and having an instant crush is me watching Solid Gold in the 80’s.
Summer of Soul is worth watching for the performance footage alone, but seeing the attendees look back at the footage and react is deeply emotionally moving.
You also see Stevie Wonder performing on the cusp of what was about to be the greatest period of artistic productivity in popular music history. (Talking Book thru Songs in the Key of Life).