Do people really read Coddling of the American Mind as a defense of free speech principles? It explicitly takes the speech of students and turns it into a psychological disorder. Hard to imagine a less friendly stance to free speech/inquiry.
Making a book length case that students shouldn’t be listened to because they’re gripped by a psychological disorder because the students disagree with the professors at elite universities does speak to someone being coddled, but it ain’t college students.
It is unsurprising that elite academics and public writer types think Coddling is a good diagnosis. It flatters those groups and puts their opinions (and feelings) above other groups. We can’t have students yelling at professors, don’t you know.
Rather than pathologizing students, faculty should have engaged with them. It’s what teachers do all the time. Of course lots of elite faculty conflate teaching with people sitting and listening to their opinions.
Yeah, I’m salty about this, but almost every day I see something saying how perceptive that dumb book is. insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "don't poke the bear" approach described here is a dynamic in many states and many state systems and I agree, it hasn't worked. At some point, the community needs to come together and have it out. This is leadership. dailytarheel.com/article/2021/0…
College of Charleston's board hired one of the bears (one of the most powerful state politicians), Glenn McConnell, over the recommendations of a search firm and wishes of faculty and students. It didn't help. He was a non-existent leader and the budget didn't budge.
U. South Carolina had Robert Caslen, former superintendent of West Point, installed as President by the Republican governor/legislature. He was an utter failure because he was put in a position which made it impossible for him to bring the community together.
In grade school in the 1970's I was exposed to anti-smoking education to prevent me from harming myself and others. I then went home and agitated until my parents quit smoking. Didn't realize I was a little totalitarianist.
The attitude that parents have literal ownership of (as opposed to responsibility for) their children is interesting to me and perhaps telling when it comes to these current school-related culture war debates. Related to this push to video teachers.
I'm sympathetic to the fear parents have for their children's well-being, but I'm also a big believer in education as a process and school as a place for students to develop agency and self-concept, which may diverge from their parents' belief.
This nut graph from @jackstripling's story on what happened with Nikole Hannah-Jones and UNC is the key. University leadership is clearly cowed by the Board. This is a pattern at this school. chronicle.com/article/how-ch…
I have no doubt that the radical activist Board of the UNC system makes it very hard to lead the flagship campus, but leadership means leading, and sometimes that means risking one's job to do the right thing.
You can't speak of the high minded values of your university and then fail to stand behind those values in the face of a challenge, even when that challenge comes from your own board. I'm sure UNC leadership is worried about what damage the Board can do, but...
For those who don't want to believe that Coddling the American Mind was the gateway to the current right wing freakout targeting free speech and academic freedom at public universities, look at how those right wingers revere the book. chronicle.com/article/presid…
I've got a blog post I'm trying to land on this topic. It's tough to get at exactly what I want to argue, but essentially, it's always been a power struggle. Student questioning problems of access and equity made some faculty uncomfortable, so they worked to silence them.
Go back in time and look at how student protest was responded to circa 2015-2016. The substance was never discussed. It was always an attempt to police how students were protesting. They weren't doing it correctly according to the people in charge.
This whole students are coddled, anti-trigger warning, anti student protest thing that's metastasized into the anti-anti-racism movement that's coming for public higher ed was just supposed to be a little internecine culture battle for primacy in elite colleges.
Faculty at elite privates got a little salty about how they were being checked by administrators/bureaucracy over issues of diversity combined with the rise of students agitating over these issues. It was looking like they may have to change the status quo.
Quelling that unrest meant pathologizing student protestors as defective and their protests therefore as unjustified. The substance of what students were protesting over was almost never discussed. They were just said to be doing it wrong by those in power.
The part of Summer of Soul where the guy talks about seeing Marilyn McCoo on stage and having an instant crush is me watching Solid Gold in the 80’s.
Summer of Soul is worth watching for the performance footage alone, but seeing the attendees look back at the footage and react is deeply emotionally moving.
You also see Stevie Wonder performing on the cusp of what was about to be the greatest period of artistic productivity in popular music history. (Talking Book thru Songs in the Key of Life).