“When primary data on red meat consumption are analyzed with validated methods & in a transparent way according to the highest scientific standards, the result's always the same: intake of unprocessed red meat poses no risk to general health &provides valuable nutrition benefits”
Red meat intake levels for the bulk of the world population are <75g/p/d. At such levels, there is no good reason to assume harm. On the contrary: meat offers key nutrients that are still limiting at population level. If anything, it's the lower intake levels that are concerning.
Here's, for instance, the association with myocardial infarction, as found in the major studies - some noise, but essentially a flat line at RR=1.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tweaking the formulation by adding 20% "hydrolyzed rice" (nutri-washed as "cereals") seems to further upgrade the scores. It's still fortified sugar though. And it's aiming at 3-year old children. world.openfoodfacts.org/product/761303…
Brought to you by the usual suspects: EAT founder + a mixture of UN representatives, finance hotshots, animal rights/vegan militants, companies with vested interests in imitation foods, & their academic stormtroopers
"Pemmican is a meat product principally comprised of a mix of dried meat&fat [] Purported high nutrient & caloric density & product robustness have merited pemmican a rich history as a food for Indigenous communities, fur traders, explorers & the military" pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33945979/
"Stefansson (1957) was a strong proponent of pemmican, & called the interest demonstrated towards it during WWII the “Second Pemmican War”. He described the studies undertaken as a revolt of modern dietitians against the traditional dominance of pemmican as an emergency ration."
"Stefansson gave clear recommendations for the use of pemmican believing it should only be an emergency ration and eaten in lesser amounts than would like to be eaten. He also believed that plain pemmican was the best"
Third, you're absolutely clueless when it comes to dealing with "systems". @WEF's toxic corporate network created this mess in the first place, and your #GreatReset & #DavosAgenda will just make things much worse. And put all of us at serious risk.
Here's the Michigan University study that came up in the recent (overblown) #Biden/#beef controversy: css.umich.edu/sites/default/… What would the carbon footprint reduction be when Americans would reduce beef intake with 90% (VERY hypothetical)?
Let's look at the numbers... THREAD👇
Here are the scenarios (converted to yearly data):
The @UN#FoodSystems Summit aims at transforming the way the world eats based on 5 Action Tracks.
This is the composition of #AT2. One would expect a sound consortium, given the impact this will have on all of us. If you don't identify the problem, let's spell it out. Thread 🧵
The Chair is the founder of EAT, an organization advocating a near-vegetarian "Planetary Health Diet" through an interventionist "Great Food Transformation". dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6…
She's also a WEF Young Global Leader; no surprise that the initiative is to be seen as a "Davos for food" with leading food multinationals in its slipstream (the 'plant-based' market being their new business model) - check this thread for background: