A not-too-long (but important) thread on the right's war on history & memory and what it's really about

When you ask a conservative why they think we should leave confederate statues & monuments up they usually won’t say it’s because they agree with the confederate cause. (1)...
Indeed that’s the point where they remind you the confederates were Democrats. Then they say something like: we shouldn’t erase history, we should learn from it. They never explain what you can learn from a statue, but OK, what's the implied lesson they're speaking of here? (2)..
Presumably, it’s that yes, there have been people who supported awful causes in our history, like enslavement—which was indeed the chief reason the South broke away—and we should remember that so as to a) not repeat past mistakes, and b) recognize our progress (3)...
But in order to really appreciate that progress, we have to teach clearly about how deeply flawed the nation was at its inception—such that the Civil War ended up being necessary to end enslavement. And yet, the same conservatives don’t want us to teach that (4)...
They insist we weren’t deeply flawed, that racism wasn’t embedded in the founding, and that to suggest otherwise is un-American and anti-white. So really they just want the statues up, not as teaching tools, but as worship altars for a cause they support, deep down (5)...
Either they support that cause or, at the very least, they are saying that the pain of our history to Black people is irrelevant to them — less important for students to learn about than the supposed “military genius” of Robert E Lee (6)...
They’re saying it is more important to honor the “bravery” of soldiers who fought for a government whose main purpose was to maintain (and expand) human bondage, than to honor the memory of those held in bondage and who led the struggle for justice (7)...
They are saying it is more important to protect the feelings of white children who might be made uncomfortable by a discussion of this nation’s historically embedded white supremacy, than to tell the truth (8)...
In so doing they disrespect Black people AND those whites who stood against white supremacy, enslavement, indigenous genocide, etc. No, there weren’t enough of them, but they were there, and they don’t have statues, and often aren’t even mentioned in the history text (9)...
So...Why not ADD those antiracist allies if your concern is not making white kids feel guilty? I mean, if they knew there were whites who resisted they could have different role models, they would see they had choices to make, and perhaps they would make them, and then...(10)...
Oh, wait...that’s the problem isn’t it? If we teach about white antiracist allies we give whites different role models. We remind them they have choices…and they might decide to join with Black and brown folks to fight for justice even now (11)...
So we can’t add them to the curriculum, even if doing so would address the shame and guilt some say they’re worried about. Because teaching about them would create white allies NOW in a cause opposed by the right—the cause of racial justice (12)...
They want kids to worship the founders and the nation’s past because frankly, they prefer it to the present. That’s what MAGA means. It’s what it has always meant. They prefer the America of the founders’ generation. They prefer the past. We believe in the future (13)...
They hate America as it actually exists now. And they have always hated the idea of it. What they have preferred is what decent people have always lamented: the failure to live up to the ideal (14)...
To us, that's the struggle of a lifetime, to make the actions jibe with the words. To them, the inconsistency is a trifle. They never believed the words. They never accepted that “All Men are created equal” meant all, any more than Jefferson did when he wrote it (15)...
They mean it the way he did: white men, preferably of propertied means—perhaps some women too, but not really Black and brown peoples. They only love America the way it was. We love the America that could be (16)...
It is time to put the older version of this country out of its misery forever. This is the battle before us: the past or the future. Choose wisely. (END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Wise

Tim Wise Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @timjacobwise

2 Jul
When you say 'Diversity efforts are fine, but we can't sacrifice merit,' you're implying that folks of color are likely less qualified, rather than acknowledging a) your standards of merit are subjective, and b) such efforts identify merit in places it's normally overlooked (1)..
To even imply such efforts would sacrifice merit is to presume the current occupational distribution reflects merit. But that requires believing whites (white men particularly) are inherently superior to others. And only racists (and sexists) could believe that (2)...
Either white folks are inherently superior or the opportunity structure is skewed in our favor: there is no other way to make sense of the current distribution of occupational positions. Obviously, only ignorant racists can believe the first of these to be true...(3)
Read 4 tweets
29 Jun
Whites often say Black people are dependent (on govt, etc). But if you have a direct ancestor who was an enslaver, you owe your LIFE to Black restraint. Had they killed your relative to get free (which they were morally entitled to do) you wouldn't exist. Who's the dependent one?
And yes, it would have been moral for any enslaved person to kill their captor. Would have been true for Ariel Castro's victims a decade or so ago, and true for those kidnapped and held in chattel bondage for 250+ years...
And this isn't even getting into how dependent white folks (and America on the whole) have been on Black labor, etc to even build the nation, obviously. I was just wanting to make the existential point because we often miss it
Read 4 tweets
26 Jun
However one feels about NC State being disqualified from the College World Series bc of positive COVID tests (and I agree, it's questionable given crowds being able to attend w/o tests/masks), some of the anti-Vanderbilt sentiment is incredibly twisted and revealing...

THREAD
First, it's not the players' fault, so hating on them is just petty bullshit. Second, showing a pic of Fauci in a Vandy shirt is not evidence that the fix is in. Some of y'all need to put down the Alex Jones pipe. You are why we can't have nice things (2)...
After all, college baseball would benefit MORE from having a great amazing underdog team like NC State knock off the defending champs, than simply passing Vandy on to the finals. The "fix" theory is illogical on its own terms (3)...
Read 12 tweets
23 Jun
The difference between liberals, conservatives & critical race theorists in one tweet

Liberals: 'America is failing to live up to its promises when it comes to equality'

Conservatives: 'No it's not.'

Critical Race Theorists: 'What promises? Those were never meant for everyone'
Fundamentally this is the key distinction. The right thinks racial disparities are the fault of those on the bottom. Liberals think we just haven't quite perfected our system. CRTs say this is exactly what the system was meant to produce...
One can agree or disagree with any of these, in turn, or perhaps come up with some hybrid of them if you choose. But to say one school of thought (CRT) is forbidden and too dangerous to allow people to hear is authoritarian thought control
Read 4 tweets
21 Jun
My latest essay on how the attack on Critical Race Theory (and antiracist education more broadly) would require canceling the real MLK from being taught. Strategically, this is a key point to emphasize in our response to them. Pass it along...

timjwise.medium.com/conservatives-…
The reason this is an important response to the right's attack on CRT and antiracist education is two fold: first, they are seeking to wrap themselves in MLKs words, by distorting the only line they know of his. We must prevent them from effectively doing that...
And second, by responding with material like that I quote in this piece -- most of it stuff few people have ever read or heard from King -- we can further present the real MLK, which is helpful in and of itself...
Read 5 tweets
18 Jun
I love it when folks say the South is so patriotic. They typically mean white conservatives of course. But historically white conservatives have been the LEAST patriotic group. Don't believe me?

A quick thread.
First, they wouldn't even join the nation unless slavery was protected & strengthened via the 3/5 compromise, a fugitive slave return provision in the constitution and the extension of the trans-Atlantic slave trade for 20 more years (2)...
...not to mention the 2nd Amendment, which, as @ProfCAnderson demonstrates in her brilliant new book, The Second, was principally about strengthening the white militia so as to put down possible rebellions by enslaved Black folks (3)...
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(