Interesting how the diversification on this new Gossip Girl show is all female. A big move now is to have no Black guys, an attractive Black guy but he's gay, or a straight cis Black guy not a heartthrob type. Another prediction: one of the black girls will be the token gay too
if they did have a straight Black guy on, he would have been more a John Boyega type Black guy and not a Trey Songz or young Denzel type. The show Quantico had this type of casting too: diverse but only the females, so it feeds into the "world as the white man's harem" fantasy
Check for yourself and you'll keep noticing it. Diversification is usually only the women, who are often shown as gay or swirlers. The Black men are either (1) straight and hot but asexual/attached like the Rock's characters. They are not usually in the mix of cast love triangles
(2) straight+cis but very nonthreatening as competition to the white male protagonists, like John Boyega. They will not be "hunk" types. (3) gay Black male, in which case they may be allowed to be conventionally hot, but even then may still be just okay looking, (4) nonexistent
Industry is another example. I think the days of a Shemar Moore heartthrob type in the cast are pretty much done. I think this character was also gay. although I couldn't make it far enough into the show to find out Image
Outside of Netflix, I feel this is highly exaggerated. This girl is part of the cast and she seems unambiguously Black and darker than a paper bag. As the most unambiguousy Black cast member tho I predict she will be gay Image
Isn't it a gay-themed show though? It actually fits my example.
I think the days of a Saved By the Bell where the brown guy was a hetero co-heartthrob alongside the white guy are gone. Interestingly I don't think Mario Lopez's character was even originally intended to be nonwhite (hence the name Slater), so that maybe played a role.
To be clear: I'm not bringing this up because I want more black men on these shows getting a seat at the table but to show how liberals want to do diversity. I feel the messaging in progressive media is that straight Black men are the least assimilable in the new diverse utopia
This is true. It also went against stereotypes to not have them be homophobic, which nowadays sadly is a brave risky narrative choice. I saw some fans be mad that they were explicitly shown not to be homophobic
So in case there was any doubt of the racial politics of this show this really made it clear. The black girl who is the woke Dan Humphrey of the show is reading Slave Play before dating her new beau, the white wokebae who just broke up with her sister last episode ImageImage
Also his nonsensical lofty language of the character “processing” it and “exorcising” is just gibberish. Just like the real life people who saw the show and claimed they were “processing” and “unpacking,” no insights were shown or evidenced afterwards. It’s an empty vessel
I know people think I mention the show too much but it’s so obvious that it’s part of a larger almost cultural propaganda project by white liberal tastemakers and their minority mascots. A work that signals the new racially pluralistic utopian vision of (liberal) white supremacy
The slavery thing and intergenerational trauma stuff is only there to give an illusion of depth and shock value because without it the message of Slave Play is no deeper than the message of Dear White People: white people stop being racist so we can fuck you in peace
That’s why no one who watches the show once they get past the gimmicky audience trauma bonding inflicted on them can give any meaningful insight they got from “unpacking” all that traumatic slavery imagery. Because it doesn’t really matter it’s a decoy.
The message is, liberal white people we are happy being your junior partners and mascots in (liberal) white supremacy vs bad (Republican) white supremacy and we’ll even let you degrade us sexually as a bonus but stop hurting our feelings by reminding us we’re black and otherized
But to say that is really all they care about makes them look bad so they need the loftier more historically truamatic Trojan horse. But the new Gossip Girl is their utopia. Black femmes as sexual center of attention of dreamy white wokebaes but never subject to otherizing racism
In fact the one conventionally attractive white blond girl is bland and insignificant and secondary to them while the white guy only obsess over the black femmes. That’s the utopia Slave Play wants and why it’s featured as what the girl is reading
OH MAN, so this gets better. Wait for it. Remember how I said this show is in the mold of Quantico, which I called an earlier test run of the "World as the white man's harem" diversity show?
So I just checked the showrunner's bio and sure enough he worked on the other "World as the white man's harem" diversity show, Quantico! I wasn't imagining the theme! lol Image
Because then they can't center White men. This is the new cost of doing business. If white men are required to do diversity to keep working/stay relevant, this is how they can do it + still preserve white male centrality. Look up "social dominance theory"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Champagne Sharks Podcast

Champagne Sharks Podcast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChampagneSharks

16 Jul
This may be most controversial thing I tweeted but...I feel a measure of sympathy for this thread and don't hate it like everyone else. I'd rather people be totally transparent and honest about money they have with hard numbers than deal with secretly rich people cosplaying poor
Yeah he's saying a lot of cringey tone-deaf stuff and is grappling clumsily with some hard issues, but admitting all that stuff can't be easy. But I hung out with a lot of bohemian types having adventures in brokeness and they talked a bunch of guillotine talk then they announce
...they just inherited over 6 figures from a grandparent they barely even knew (that's a true story) while I was wondering if I'd ever make enough money to support my parents into old age. I'd rather more people be like him and just spill it all and interrogate it...
Read 10 tweets
16 Jul
Start here and follow to its conclusion as I and others immediately start searching. Any white guy who praises Asian success as being about high IQ and their freedom to be unPC/racist/xenophobic always ends up being antiblack racist with an Asian partner
I struggled to find this last piece of the puzzle, the best I could find was a stay in China on his blog, but this guy had better google skills and found the final piece to complete the @charlesmurray/@DissidentRight bingo card
Read 8 tweets
15 Jul
"Death of the Author" is one guy's preference on how to enjoy and discuss art. It's not a natural law like gravity or a proven theory like Theory of Relativity or something. You can't just win an argument by citing it exists. People are allowed to not be swayed by it!
Every time there is a debate on a piece of art, someone inevitably comes in with "uh, ever hear of Death of the Author?" like the other person missed the latest scientific development or debunking on a topic they're talking about. It's an opinion not some irrefutable truth lol
I'm not talking about people who get it wrong or use it to excuse pedos. I'm saying even what it actually says (removing author's intention) when interpreted correctly is not an objective truth people are obligated to follow but one person's opinion
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
These complaints are always disingenuous. If it's too childish for grownups to hate on, it's too childish for grownups to care about grownups hating on it like you are. Why would you even care what anyone was saying about something truly not meant for any adults to enjoy?
People like this are clearly just in their feelings people aren't supporting a movie they like, but they can't just admit that or are too lazy to articulate a defense of the movie so they have to resort to this disingenuous "it's for kids, grownups shouldn't care." But YOU care
If you like something, just defend it on its merits. No one buys the whole "I'm doing this for the kids" shit. People out here using these hypothetical kids as shields, like kids are on the same social media as adults or reading thinkpieces getting their days ruined lol.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
This whole thread is pointless and time-wasting because at the end of the day none of the people leading the CRT panic care what the fuck you call any of it or how it evolved or related to each other. They don’t like ANYTHING that says racism is real and whites today benefit
more productive thing would be for the CRT critics who keep trying to prove everything is CRT give us an example of what they think is the best school of antiracism and why and let us litigate that. What IS good antiracism if any? What DO white people need to improve in re:race?
If you could prove that Ibram Kendi is not CRT, would Christopher Rufo suddenly be okay with him? Or suddenly be okay with CRT if it was proven to not be same framework as DiAngelo? No, they’d hate all of them no matter what you call them so long as it says racism is real
Read 6 tweets
8 Jul 20
The show villain The real villain ImageImage
Just about everything that goes bad for them really is because of Jesse and honestly Walt is exceedingly patient with him and nails him out of so many jams it’s insane. Jesse also forced Walt into the position where he had to poison Brock yes I said it
In the final season they really play up the Walt the Heel act and make him really really genuinely shitty to Jesse to kind of balance things better but the first four seasons Jesse is dead weight and ruins everything. On rewatch I decided Jesse is actually real metaphoric cancer
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(