Scott Santens Profile picture
Jul 7, 2021 10 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Over 10 years after the 2-year universal basic income pilot ended in Namibia, this follow-up report has been published. It includes interviews with recipients, like this one with Josef Ganeb, a bricklayer, whose business flourished during the #UBI pilot.

bignam.org/Publications/B…
Rudolphine Eigowas is a dressmaker and her business flourished too but when the pilot ended, problems born of money scarcity returned.

"I just want that they bring back the BIG, the whole Namibia must get the BIG - the problems are not only here - the whole Namibia must get it!”
Christian Swartbooi repaired shoes during the pilot. Over ten years later his eyesight prevents him from continuing that work and he wishes #BasicIncome would return.

“BIG was working.” His wife, Crecia, continues: “With the BIG we never had to suffer, but now we are suffering.”
Stephanus Eigowab was the local school director.

"What people bought is still there. And some still have small shops, where they sell food, those sort of businesses continue to work on a smaller scale. Other small businesses had to stop since people no longer have money to buy.”
Johannes Goagoseb had contracted HIV a few years before the UBI pilot began, and had been imprisoned after he was caught poaching to afford his HIV meds. The UBI pilot turned his life around. After it ended, so did his life. His brother now poaches too to feed his kids.
Sella and Alfred were able to start their own small business when the UBI pilot started.

"While the BIG was here, we continuously sold things and always kept stock. We do not have regular customers any longer, the problem is that now people do not have money to buy things."
Emilia Garises: "BIG was the best of all. BIG was actually not only N$100. If you are five people in the household, then that amounts to N$500... Some people are afraid, BIG would make us lazy, but how can income make you lazy? It is the other way around: BIG pushes you forward."
The biggest success story of all is widely regarded as being Frieda Nembwaya who started her own bakery as soon as she got her first UBI payment. All these years later, her biz remains:

“The BIG was good, this is why I am where I am now. If you have nothing, where can you start?
Frieda also experienced other forms of assistance. She was given goats by Germany, which she describes as not helping anything at all. With no nearby grazing, they were useless except for eating. Money is what helps people, and she believes the government damn well knows that.
Having reached the end of this report, one thing rings through the entire thing. Those who were part of the UBI pilot want it back, and they're extremely disappointed in Bishop Kameeta for becoming the Minister of Poverty Eradication, but not introducing UBI yet as they'd hoped.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Santens

Scott Santens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scottsantens

May 3
There's something about the debate going unsaid when we argue over whether AI will replace human labor or complement it.

If replace, then basic income is definitely needed.

If complement, then it's easy to believe we own the total value of our enhanced labor. But why is that?
If my labor is enhanced by technology, such that my work as a human contributes 10% to what I produce and a machine contributes the other 90%, then why do I deserve anything more than 10%, even if I own the machine?

Now we need to ask where the machine came from...
Robots, AI, computer hardware and software, it all came from the past. Those alive today are building on what those humans no longer with us built, who themselves built on what they were given.

Government spending was invested in all of this technology to grow and accelerate it.
Read 6 tweets
May 17, 2023
"People perceive national debt as a negative, Grey said. But instead, he argues, you can think of it as a savings account, because people are earning interest through the bonds that they hold."

Correct. The "debt" is assets, and the ceiling is just dumb.
marketplace.org/2023/05/12/cou…
It is a choice we make to issue Treasury securities $1 for $1 of federal spending that exceeds taxes. We don't have to do that, but it's popular because people like earning a US government guaranteed rate of interest.

The entire #DebtCeilingCrisis is just a hostage situation.
The US issues USD. We choose to also issue securities that pay USD interest. Our 14th Amendment says we can't default on any of our promised payments. Just keep making the payments, and we may as well also issue a $1 trillion coin to demonstrate we don't have to issue securities.
Read 5 tweets
May 15, 2023
This is good but I wish it also included how Medicare Part D doesn't even carry the same issue as the rest of Medicare because it was set up to use general revenue. It's the example that proves all that's required to "fix Social Security" is just a legislative change in wording. ImageImageImage
If we decide to reduce Social Security payments in the future, that's a political choice. We certainly don't have to do that. We can keep making 100% of payments, and no we don't even have to lift the cap on payroll taxes. We can just spend the money.

stephaniekelton.substack.com/p/what-fdr-and… ImageImage
It's really harmful how wide and how strong the myth-based belief is that the national "debt" is some big scary loan of some kind instead of being more like a savings account and how running a deficit is somehow bad regardless of what the spending is for.

evonomics.com/isnt-time-stop…
Read 4 tweets
May 4, 2023
At their annual meeting, the Southern African Quaker Community voted in support of the introduction of a universal basic income for all people legally in South Africa. Here they explain the reasons behind the resolution.

dailymaverick.co.za/article/2023-0…
"The poverty-stricken masses have nothing going for them, see no hope for their future, and have nothing to lose. South Africa is a tinderbox that will catch fire if a match is thrown into it... South Africa may be considered a real-world example of where the world is going."
"In our view as Quakers, unconditional universality is pivotal. First, this emphasizes the equality and worth of all. Second, it avoids introducing a massive bureaucracy and associated procedures, often carried out by uncaring officials and involving lengthy waits."
Read 4 tweets
Apr 12, 2023
UBI critics: If we give people money without conditions, people will stop working.

UBI pilot: Turns out the UBI group worked more than the control group.

UBI critics: Well of course giving people more money works. But it costs too much.

UBI pilot: Turns out the money spent on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"We fail to find effects of the [monthly CTC], and temporary removal of the work requirement, on labor force participation and total hours worked."

Brand new study. Same old result. Unconditional income didn't reduce people's labor force participation.

nber.org/system/files/w… Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
A 🧵 of key takeaways from the final results of the @stocktondemo of #BasicIncome published yesterday:

✅No negative impact on work
✅Income volatility down
✅Mental health improved
✅Less fatigued
✅Improved physical functioning
✅More bargaining power

link.springer.com/article/10.100… Image
Pre-pandemic, employment increased quite a bit in the basic income group, but the increase did not remain significant during the pandemic. It's possible that this and other non-significant results were due to unexpected attrition by the end of the experiment. (more on that later) Image
Income volatility was another measure that decreased significantly pre-pandemic, but did not remain significant, as did psychological distress. People in the basic income group moved from "likely to have a mental health disorder" to "likely to be well" in year one, pre-Covid. Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(