At the time, I agreed, b/c I didn't really like physics that much, though my bio and them grades were great.
Once I decided I didn't want to go to law school (OG plan #1), I seriously considered switching to nursing or medicine. But I made that promise and so stayed in POLI
The thing is, 1993-97 was an exceptional time for health care in Alberta. The cuts were brutal, and they went deeper than they needed to be. Lots of folks remember this.
This isn't our first rodeo, so to speak.
And so I wonder at the political skills of those trying to politicize this workplace again, in a similar way. This isn't the same Alberta. It's not the same budget.
We're all more aware now about how these cuts hurt everyone, even if they land hardest on the front line.
A front line disproportionately populated by racialized women.
Asking these women to bear the brunt of bad budgetary choices? In this context? It seems especially foolish
I can't be the only one who remembers how those 1993-97 cuts were used to advocate for privatization, especially because the cuts were designed to create crises that privatization was supposed to "fix."
We can see this for the ideological game it is. We're not naive
Seeing today that nurses "merit" a salary rollback almost entirely to the start of the pandemic, because they have job security?
Does anyone actually believe this messaging? Does it resonate positively with literally anyone?
I might be the odd one out here, but being a politician is a hard job. The schedule sucks, everyone likes to yell at you, and the commute can be horrendous. It's hard.
NOT UNLIKE BEING A NURSE.
Compensate everyone fairly. Look elsewhere to economize the budget #abpoli#ableg
This is ANOTHER piece where I try and fail to explain women's levels of subjective self-evals like interest, efficacy, and ambition. But we find some other neat things!
Here, we're interested in the political consequences of losing at competition. We build on the idea that women are more competition-averse than men b/c women are, on average, more aware that, if you compete, you might do poorly or lose
We argue this may be one reason why women report lower levels of interest, efficacy, or ambition: they're more accurate, taking into account more possibilities than are men.