Real scouts watch games like England-Denmark and realize that Declan Rice is a superstar DM while fans wait for him to have a good game before rating him.
Vestegaard another one. Real composure and real height for a CB.
Physically, Rice is like the midfield version of Virgil Van Dijk.
He is immense but has legs like a spindly winger. He turns sharp like a trailer on motorcycle wheels. He anticipates attacks and doesn't rush in — brainy. He could be using his size to rush in and dominate duels
but he doesn't. He anticipates the next action, blocks the passing lanes, trusts his own brain to win him the midfield battle over his brawn. Amazing.
Every single club in Europe in need of a DM should be fighting over him. He will, at least, reach Fabinho's level for sure.
But if everything goes well, Declan Rice has got the minerals to retire as a legendary DM. He is literally as physically outstanding as a CB. His passing is not yet fully developed but that's a by product of his circumstances. No reason he can't improve it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Honestly, if there was anything our rivals ought to be jealous of, it's the quality of the youngsters coming out of Hale End.
Look at Saka for instance, a boy born ready for the limelight.
Emile Smith-Rowe puts most 10s in the league to shame with his raw profile alone.
Folarin Balogun is another 6ft, silky legged spider who has an adult's body and the presence of a superstar. His mental, physical and technical profile honestly recalls Henry.
Miguel Azeez has freak genetics and reminds me of other genetic freaks like Jules Kounde and Mbappe.
Joe Willock is already a proven line-breaker and true EPL goal threat from midfield. Physically indomitable.
Then there's the likes of Nelson, Maitland-Niles as squad fodder and 20M assets who have excelled in the hardest of EPL matches.
Sterling's role at City magnifies the worst aspects of his game. City's system is a ball progression machine which means that most of the infield dribbling/carrying we have seen this Euros is not especially needed. Ball progression is automated at City.
Sterling is often required to hold the width and run in behind. When this is not happening and the ball comes to him, Sterling has to efficiently use the ball in the very structured system at City while also having the freedom to perform as an individual. This specific dynamic
which requires a Pep winger with a lot of ability to decide what actions to take at a particular time is a dynamic that is best suited for the best players. It is a dynamic for choice. "Do I simply hand the ball back to Rodri and overload or do I dribble past everyone to score?"
Understand this, I have nothing to gain from being a constant supporter of what the new regime at Arsenal does. AFTV built an empire from suckling off negativity and we're not yet out of the gutters. However, too much irrationality surrounds fandom.
I am an extremely rational individual. At least in studying large, fluid bodies of knowledge and situations. It's only through rationalism that you can understand irrationality and spot it from a mile away.
Let's look at the Saliba situation again.
William Saliba is a very talented young defender whose signing delighted me a lot, though it was expensive. He has the raw profile to be a massive success for Arsenal. But right now, in this moment, he is at best an OK defender. He is not yet a brilliant or assertive player.
The Sassuolo midfielder is a pretty good central midfielder but is not (too) exactly what we need. In terms of how he's used and the spaces he occupies at Sassuolo, he's pretty much identical to Xhaka, which is a good thing. But
we have a specific system here, a goal to maximize the team's potential and a need to reach that goal as quickly as possible. Basically, we need to increase the overall potential/quality of how we play.
Look at how Ole's system at UTD gradually looked better with better players.
A similar thing is about to occur with Arteta's Arsenal but we need to be careful and thoughtful about who we sign at this point.
You can have many good players who can perform similar roles well for the same team but don't max out the potential of that team at the same levels.
Lol, Renato is not Wjnaldum. Plus you quite overrate tempo play. Having the best tempo controller in the world is not going to be very effective against top teams and PnP wins the midfield. Look at how Barca's midfield with Busquets constantly gets overran. Kante vs City/Real.
Against most smaller teams, as long as the CMs are tidy in possession and can pick a pass (as well as familiar with a system that constantly generates superiorities), you are fine. You don't need Busquets or Toni Kroos to break down all low blocks. You need confident passers.
I rate midfield controlling a lot (big Xhaka fan) but the EPL is a different beast, especially with the high-pressure system we play. Once you get past Locatelli, that's it. He's out. Even Xhaka is more valuable out of possession.
—His general philosophy of adding big amounts of athleticism to the squad, for starters. You can't compete at a top, top level without it, especially in the Premier League. Here's an old quote from The Athletic:
—Ever since he came in, the most solid of all our transfer links (widely reported) have been Gabriel, Partey, Stones, Bissouma, Buendia, Willian, Aouar, Onana, Maddison, White, etc. They are generally (regarded as) pretty good players who mostly (will) improve us.
—Even the sideways Willian signing was pretty much the perfect profile for what Arteta wanted on the wings; creative LW in the halfspaces and wide, play-stretching RW on the flanks. Basically, his targets are specific and planned for a specific system. Means most will work out.