The reality is that the US is not driving the push for decoupling and confrontation now. Beijing is.
Some are responding "for some time now". Not true, in my view. The 2008 crisis definitely altered Beijing's view of the US for the worse, but even during Trump's trade war, China was looking for ways to deescalate. This changed in 2019, and solidified in 2020.
You can say "deescalate on their own terms" and that's absolutely correct. But the shift towards China seeing decoupling as an objective is of much more recent vintage, the past two years or so. And I think it's a very alarming trend.
It's one reason I'm a lot more concerned over Taiwan than I would normally be. It's like Beijing is digging in financially and economically for a coming storm.
Yes, there are still people in the US pushing for confrontation/decoupling. There has been a bipartisan souring on China, extending into the corporate biz community as well. But the more aggressive versions of this (Navarro) are no longer in the driver seat, if they ever were.
And yet the greater flexibility (if not resolve) on the US side - perhaps accompanied by some hesitancy - have not been matched on the Chinese side; quite the opposite. Xi seems to be feeling his oats.
Some will argue that, in the South China Sea, for example, China has been "slicing the salami" for some time. That's true. But the strategy of "slicing the salami" itself is a recognition that seeking outright confrontation is risky and undesirable.
The question - raised by Hong Kong, by Didi, by the Anchorage summit, by Wolf Warriors - is whether China's days of "slicing the salami" - pushing but taking care not to push too far at once - are over, to be replaced by?
There seems to be - sometimes under the cover of COVID - an intentional cutting of ties of travel, finance, and business by China. The country has become more isolated over the past year than in a very long time.
That COVID-induced isolation, of course, is not unique to China. But Xi seems to be embracing it in a way other countries are not, and I find it worrying.
Someone might say "but you're not in China anymore, that's why you feel this sense of growing distance." Perhaps, but fewer and fewer foreigners - journalists, think-tankers, businesspeople, investors - have been able to spend time in China recently. It's a widespread thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Chovanec

Patrick Chovanec Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @prchovanec

9 Jul
If China invaded Taiwan, and President Biden sent US forces to defend it, what would the Fox News/Newsmax narrative be? I am genuinely curious.
I suspect it would be that Biden's weakness invited the invasion, and that he was screwing up the conduct of the war (perhaps on purpose). Unlike with Putin, they couldn't openly side with China.
But I wonder how far it would go. Would it simply be scoring points off Biden, or would they actively oppose the war effort itself?
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
Preoccupied with the coming July 4 weekend last Friday, I didn't do a download of the June employment report. So I'll rectify that, before any more time goes by.
The US economy added +850,000 new jobs in June. That is still -6.8 million jobs below February 2020.
The unemployment rate rose slightly in June to 5.9%.
Read 15 tweets
8 Jul
Tucker did. Even if someone in the US government were aware of Tucker's conversations being intercepted, they (properly) didn't make it public in an attempt to cast aspersions on him. Tucker is the only reason we've heard anything about this.
If Tucker had been "unmasked" for political motives, you'd think we'd have heard about Tucker's calls from someone who wanted to use it to damage him. But we didn't. We heard about it solely from Tucker.
If the US government overhears you talking to foreign agents, doesn't make it public, and maybe - I don't know if this happened or not - privately tells you you've been picked up and might want to be more careful who you talk to, that doesn't strike me as a political hit job.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
A long day reading about aircraft maintenance records, in preparation for check ride.
This is the boring part that nobody even wants to teach you because it's so boring, but you have to know to pass.
"So, you've just realized that your flaps don't work. Are you allowed to take off?"
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
US personal income fell -2.0% m/m in May, up +2.8% from a year ago, which put it back down close to trend following another big stimulus-driven spike.
US consumer spending was flat in May, but still up +18.9% compared to the COVID shutdown a year ago. The absolute numbers (below) show it roughly recovered to pre-COVID trend.
The US personal savings rate declined to 12.4%, after an unprecedented spike during COVID, though it remains at levels not seen since the early 1980s.
Read 6 tweets
7 Jul
No, the NSA may have been spying on foreigners who Tucker Carlson talked to. That's a pretty big difference.
I think most people understand the difference, they just don't want to.
If Dennis Rodman calls up his buddy Kim Jong-un, I'm pretty sure the NSA will be listening. That doesn't mean the NSA is spying on Dennis Rodman. It means they're spying on Kim - as they darn well should be.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(