The United States Capitol Police department is running out of money.
5 sources told us, in the worst case scenario, the department could end up furloughing dozens -- if not 100s -- of employees
@PunchbowlNews Mid-August is “crunch time” for USCP. funding issue critical then.
The account used to pay USCP officers' salaries is running dangerously low and is in dire need of replenishment by Congress.
@PunchbowlNews Officers have racked up a massive amount of overtime since the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
House passed a $1.9b security funding bill in May that included more $ for Cap Police. That legislation has been stalled in the Senate. incl more than 31m for overtime costs
@PunchbowlNews It’s unclear if and to what extent the USCP is going to need to cut down on services or remove posts because of its cash crunch. One source told us the fiscal picture may improve somewhat when Congress leaves for the August recess
@PunchbowlNews This, plus lots of other deeply news about the politics of governing
In @PunchbowlNews AM this morning, we took a deeply reported look at who @GOPLeader may appoint to the Jan. 6 committee. He is going to make appointments — unless something unexpected happens.
@PunchbowlNews@GOPLeader >@Jim_Jordan: he and KM once loathed each other, but Trump brought them together. Jordan has been through Benghazi select committee and impeachment and is generally seen as a “captain” of any Republican team. Jordan has brawled w Schiff/Raskin and he understands how they operate
@PunchbowlNews@GOPLeader@Jim_Jordan → @RepMikeJohnson is a lawyer -- which McCarthy could use. He has the added benefit of having been through impeachment; Johnson served as one of the former president’s top defenders during Trump’s first Senate trial.
@PunchbowlNews@RepRonKind@SenatorBaldwin — Steve Ricchetti will be on the Hill today with Louisa Terrell and Shuwanza Goff talking to lots of lawmakers on the House side.
— We caught up with @AOC who seems quite cool with how the process is going so far. She said she feels “good,” although noted that’s not a great adjective.
She seems open to the bipartisan bill if the Senate passes a budget
We are at beginning of a very long and complicated process when it comes to Biden’s agenda — both on the hard infrastructure & human infrastructure side
why? bc progressives are going to be asked to vote for the buget with a promise of a bill later on. that’s tough. especially when so few Rs in the House are going to vote for the hard infra/none will vote for human inf
In @PunchbowlNews this AM: ☀️Inside the W.H.’s infrastructure strategy
This is a massive week for President Joe Biden’s quest to cut a bipartisan infrastructure deal. And we expect the president to lean in and try to move the process along.
@PunchbowlNews Here’s news we have after relentlessly bugging people on Father’s Day (sorry!):
→ 1st: Tthe WH truly seems to believe a deal with the bipartisan group of 20 senators is doable and perhaps even likely. We can’t tell how much of this is sunny optimism and how much is reality
@PunchbowlNews → The White House’s main focus this week is to try to figure out the right mix of offsets so the bipartisan group of senators will back off its insistence on hiking the gas tax and instituting a tax on miles driven by electric vehicles.
Why Biden shouldn’t take the deal, as we laid out in @PunchbowlNews this AM:
→ 1 tough vote. If Congress jams everything from Biden’s American Jobs and Families plans into one massive, multi-trillion dollar reconciliation package, then lawmakers only have to take one vote.
@PunchbowlNews → Don’t be cute. In order to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill, Biden will have to corral Ds to simultaneously support a separate reconciliation package filled with more controversial spending provisions for social programs. Don’t you realize how hard that’s going to be?
@PunchbowlNews → Progressives see a trap -- and they might be right. Say this roughly $1 trillion package passes with Sinema and @Sen_JoeManchin backing it -- or even leading the way, as Sinema is doing. Will they vote for a package that includes big social program spending? Or tax increases?
In @PunchbowlNews this AM, we laid out five reasons why @JoeBiden should take this infrastructure deal, and why he shouldn’t — based on reporting from the Capitol and the White House.
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden → Biden should take it because he has a lot of stuff to get done. And the most efficient and best way to get the most stuff done is to get some stuff done all the time, so you have less stuff to do.
Make sense? There’s a deal on the table, or at least the outlines for a deal.
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden → Scratching an itch is fun. Biden wants a bipartisan W worse than we want the cicadas to bury themselves for the next 17 yrs. And guess what, Mr. President: This is your chance. Not many more after this