Let’s parse this ridiculous and insulting claim. UCP says the nurses currently cost $141 million per year more than ‘comparator provinces’. (in a province where *everyone* makes more). And we’re expected to believe that reducing this figure by 3% will help 1/5
prevent Alberta’s finances from ‘running into the ground’. Really? Taking $4-5 million away from nurses puts even a fraction of a dent in how much UCP threw away on KXL? Or corporate no-job tax cuts? Or the money losing refinery? 2/5
How much are the pay increases for the new loyalty-rewarding ministries plus all their new staff going to cost? How much is your Open for Summer Tour costing us? Nurses, like the teachers you will no doubt attack next, have been losing their buying power year after year. 3/5
Salaries have not kept up with the increased cost of living. Public sector workers are ALSO taxpayers and participate in the economy. What do they cut when wages are cut? Spending on new vehicles, furniture, restaurants, entertainment, home renovations and repairs, etc. 4/5
You know that vilifying unions plays well to your base that you are desperate to bring back onside with UCP. But we’ve all seen enough to know that this is more lies and gaslighting. At least stop insulting our intelligence by claiming to support & respect the public sector. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 The education minister is now forming Teacher and Parent Advisory Councils because she wants to ‘hear their unique voices and perspectives’ on education. I think the word ‘unique’ is a clue as to what she is after. She has heard loud and clear that most teachers 1/6
in Alberta have no confidence in her leadership. So, the ‘unique’ voice is presumably the 1% who would say something else? Tens of THOUSANDS of parents, teachers, actual curriculum experts, ethnic & cultural groups and more have written, met with MLAs, tried to meet with her, 2/6
responded to her survey, made phone calls, written articles and submitted reports. The new curriculum is a failure to an overwhelming majority of everyone who has examined it. School boards have submitted hundreds of pages of detailed, objective analysis, going through it 3/6
One of the many problems feedback groups identified with the curriculum is inconsistency. For example, different terminology is used to refer to the same concept in different grades. It makes it harder to scope & sequence. 1/7
Or, a learning outcome from one grade matches better with a similar learning outcome in a different grade and subject area. Teachers integrate subject matter for more in-depth learning (and it maximizes time!) For example, a science topic might fit in with Social Studies. 2/7
The fact that we have members on the curriculum advisory panel who are apparently just *now* reading other parts of the curriculum that were not their particular interest provides some insight into how these inconsistencies occurred. 3/7
The 4 francophone school boards met to discuss the draft curriculum with the education minister. They found the meeting polite but ‘disappointing’ and ‘unsatisfying’. (Paraphrasing) They didn’t feel like she was there to listen and she seemed surprised that they did not want 1/4
to pilot the new curriculum. The francophone representatives didn’t feel like she understood what their education rights are as francophones, while she felt that they the government had taken great steps to satisfy the francophone community. 2/4
They are planning to take a detailed look at the social studies, music and French as a first language programs in particular, and give detailed notes and recommendations on those, which they expect to be taken seriously. 3/4
Joseph Schow is calling a point of order on Rachel Notley for having said that ‘the premier continues to denigrate teachers daily.’ Sarah Hoffman says that she knows thousands of teachers who feel that way. #ableg
She is correct.
Nathan Cooper rules that it is a point of order because it ‘imputes unavowed motives’ to Kenney. What a clown show UCP is. 🤡 They are pathetic.
Now Schow wants to ‘elevate the level of debate in this chamber’ because he finds it ‘despicable’ that Rachel Notley said that Kenney probably doesn’t have a lot of young mothers with children in his circle. Christina Gray apologizes and withdraws.
Searle Turton asks Shandro in the #ableg why are teachers not being prioritized for vaccines? Shandro: ‘We depend on Federal Government for supply.’ We can’t give out doses we do not have. Albertans over 40 can be vaccinated including teachers.
Turton follows up with a question about teachers’ risks and concerns about the variants. The variants can affect younger people and does that not put our teachers at risk?
Shandro says the variants are more dangerous for all Albertans, so they are focusing on more vulnerable Albertans first, and will get to everyone when they have supplies. How totally insulting 😤