Reminder: Even if vaccines are 97% effective, mortality risk for *unvaccinated* children is lower than vaccinated adults over 30. 100x lower than vaccinated adults over 75.

**No mitigation measure can be justified as "for the children," ever.** Image
(And that's without adjusting for overascertainment, which we know is substantial.)
Why are you masking unvaccinated children at lower risk than vaccinated adults you unmasked, @RWalensky? Even if masks worked it makes no sense.
**Being a child is substantially more protective than being vaccinated.**
The unvaccinated children are even lower risk than the vaccinated teachers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phil Kerpen

Phil Kerpen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kerpen

9 Jul
Updated UK data. Delta CFR with 28-day follow-up ticks down from 0.3% to 0.2%.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Breakout by age and vax status.
Delta secondary attack rates near parity with Alpha.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jun
CDC's own V-Safe data shows:

0.5% need medical care after first shot and 0.7% second = 12,000 kids per million.

3,000 of those (0.1% after first shot and 0.2% second) need emergency or hospital care.

To avoid 8000 infections, 7800 too mild to require hospitalization.
Also, for every million kids vaccinated, 91,000 are unable to do normal daily activities after the first shot and 254,000 after the second.

That's 345,000 kids home sick to avoid 8000 COVID infections, 7800 of which are too mild to require hospitalization.
Read 4 tweets
16 Jun
A Group Of Parents Sent Their Kids' Face Masks To A Lab For Analysis. Here's What They Found townhall.com/tipsheet/scott…
They didn't find viruses, because respiratory aerosols are too small and go right through or around.
The bacterial and fungal growth is from the moist environment created by masking, in contrast to the shirt tested. It's not everywhere.
Read 5 tweets
14 Jun
Wrong. Same viral interference phenomenon happened everywhere in the world, regardless of mask usage or non-usage. And the other viruses started to rise whenCOV2 peaked, in January -- masks firmly on.
U.S. biofire data. Look what happens from COV2 peak.
syndromictrends.com
Read 10 tweets
27 May
Yahoo! of all places just clowned @RWalensky for her reckless false claims about kids.
news.yahoo.com/youngest-child…
Shorter Walensky: who needs science? White House politicals and the teachers unions keep me on a short leash.
I got nothing else, so here's an idiotic "vectors" claim debunked for over a year. Except even stupider now because everyone vulnerable has been offered vaccination.
Read 4 tweets
16 May
The only thing CDC has been consistent about is their insane anti-children, anti-science take on everything. Disgraceful.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(