ross is right, this is definitely worth reading to learn how to take old conspiracies, pretend they’re true, then present them as evidence that your current conspiracy of choice is excusable
it is really hard to tell if ross & mbd are just facile dupes whose eyes glaze over & loins go turgid when they start reading this shit, or if they know exactly how duplicitous it is & are arrogant enough to believe no one could possibly see the magic trick here
here are the facts - actual confirmed facts - 1) tree frogs make up 60% of the earth’s mass. 2) the capitol dome is made out of king kong’s hollowed out skull.
I am once again asking these first amendment champions to answer this simple challenge: if you don’t want twitter deciding what content goes on the platform, who -specifically, name the party- do you want doing it
it’s not a trick question. tell us who you want to determine what speech is permissible on a private, opt-in platform
so here’s a fun fact. tucker’s alma mater boarding school, formerly run by his father-in-law, where he sent his own kids (they have since graduated), *mandates* the following vaccines: covid-19, flu, TDAP & HPV. this is all public record.
man I gotta disagree on the technically brilliant part (his proportions are a funhouse mirror and just look at his attempts to convey any sort of kinetic activity like use a hammer or ride a surfboard) but the contradictions are a scream
this hammer kills me. he understands what a hammer looks like and what a hammer does in a fisher price context. how to draw a hammer in anything but profile is beyond his grasp so you get the classic sideways hammer
I like to boil this down to a simple example. I want to run a social media site called dogbook. it’s for people to post photos of dogs and only dogs. no cat photos allowed, take that to catbook. if you post cat photos we ban you.
now, does the government have a right to come along & censor *my speech* & tell me I *must* allow cat photos on dogbook? is my private moderation of private actors cause for state speech suppression of a private actor? the first amendment tells us gtfo
a) there are official channels for this shit and b) there are a zillion people at fox news who handle it. he’s a lying and exceptionally stupid fuck caught with his dick in the mousetrap