#HotTake?
I honestly can’t be assed about radical feminists forming coalition with right wingers. I’d rather not but meh, the entire point of politics is building connections.
Our bad faith detractors are gonna try to discredit us anyway. Even if we don’t go and work with the right, “left leaning” opponents of radical feminism are still gonna point to the “overlap” in our views, opposition to the trans movement, to tar us with the same brush.
They’re clearly not in good faith and are gonna find any reason to smear, slander, and dismiss us. So why keep playing their game? Why keep jumping through their hoops? Even if we don’t touch rightists with a ten foot pole and take the high way, you think they care?
It’s evident that they’re just looking for any excuse to bash radical feminism and radical feminism specifically because they can understand how horseshoe theory and purity politics are BS when it comes to them, or literally anyone else.
Literally every ideology “overlaps” an opposing one in some way. That’s not news. Christian conservatives, Hindutva fascists, and atheist liberals all hate Islam — and each other. Islamic fundamentalists, pagan Nazis, and atheist Marxists all hate Israel — and each other.
Both libfems and incels are pro-prostitution. Some wignats, like Richard Spencer, are pro-abortion because they like how it keeps the black population down. Both fascists and socdems are for a welfare state. These examples can be listed endlessly.
The point is, even apolitical normies can see that two (or more) ideologies/movements sharing a stance, even working together based on said stance, doesn’t necessarily make them the same at all.
So, why do the same lefty types loudly insisting that anti-Zionism isn’t anti-Semitic throw their own logic out the window to dismiss gender critical as anti-trans? They’re clearly being disingenuous. They can see damn well the difference, they’re just pretending not to.
Speaking of a certain group, lemme spill the T on Antifa. Marching with literal “fa” and Proud Boys their goddamn selves. Now wanting to act high and mighty over their ~former allies~ turning up at the #WiSpa protest, just this time not on their side.

google.com/amp/s/www.nati…
So yeah. If Antifa can march with Proud Boys against gun control, then radfems can march with Proud Boys against dressing room dick. Either you’re against left-leaning people brushing shoulders with fash or you condone it. Not just when it suits you.

google.com/amp/s/www.lati…
If you see a problem with one but not the other, just stop pretending to clutch your pearls already and admit that your problem is with the views themselves, not the tactics used to express them. Be honest and consistent ffs.
Everyone with a brain should be (and is!) against little girls seeing dick. Idk why these absolute geniuses are pointing out the right wing latching onto this incident as if it invalidates it at all (back before they started backtracking saying it never happened!)
Like chief, that doesn’t make us look bad — that makes YOU look bad. When literal fash are at least pretending to care about women and children more than you, you fucked up. Maybe you’re not as progressive as you’d like to think 🤔
If being against fetishistic flashing is white supremacy by some fucking reach, then shit, call me the blackkklanswoman 💀 absolute clown shit. How tf is common sense and bodily privacy being politicized at all, let alone framed like this. Your kids will look at you like idiots.
TLDR, we’re gonna get a bad rep either way, no point in trying to play the purity politics game. We’ll never be good enough for them and that’s by design. They just want an excuse to silence radical feminists and not even listen to us, hence guilt by association smears.
The problem of optics is more legitimate, but like I said, they will find a way to link GC feminism to ~the far right~ even if we stay off of Fox News. Smart freethinkers, the sort of people we want in our movement, will see through this logical fallacy.
The rightists would be around even if we didn’t use their platforms, it’s not like Tucker Carlson would have died if a GC feminist had not gone on his cursed show. A few feminists appearing on right wing media isn’t what’s giving them their daily bread.
However, I’m not very sure about the utility of this tactic. Conservatives are against this for their own reasons already, it’s like preaching to the choir. And ofc people usually stick to outlets on their “side” so we’re not gonna be reaching who we really need to, the left.
And as for converting conservatives… very unlikely. There’s a reason why most radfems were normie liberals or mainstream leftists first. Despite their testerical insistence that we are right wing, our values and ideology are fundamentally leftist and therefore closer to theirs.
A conservative woman would have to completely 180 on like 98% of her views in order to become a radical feminist. Whereas progressive women only have to change 2% without any fundamental change in worldview or values.
Conservatives are against abortion. Radical feminism very much supports abortion. Conservatives are generally religious, or at least positive towards religion. Radical feminism is fiercely critical of religion.
Conservatives worship marriage and exalt the nuclear family. Radical feminism is critical of both and endorses separatism and anti-natalism. Conservatives are anti-gay. Radical feminism is very pro-gay. Conservatives love gender roles. Radical feminism hates all gender.
We’re literally those anti-capitalist lesbian babykilling witches that Pat Robertson quote warned you about.
We should not worry about catching right wing cooties. We know our values and we know what we stand for. A group of leftist lesbians isn’t turning into tradcon tradwives from breathing the same air as a Republican, our beliefs aren’t so fragile and their beliefs aren’t so good.
Trans activists are always saying that people know their own selves better than anyone else. Ok, radfems know ourselves better than any of you. They hate your movement because they’re misogynistic and homophobic, we hate your movement because YOU’RE misogynistic and homophobic.
Nothing is gonna stop us from being pro-choice, pro-gay, anti-theist, anti-porn, anti-gender, anti-racist, anti-capitalist, leftist, radical, feminists. And nothing is gonna stop us from standing for women. Seethe, cope, dilate, die mad about it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radfem Black

Radfem Black Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadfemBlack

2 May
The sex trade being pushed in the name of women’s freedom is the biggest switcheroo in the history of the world.
It only takes 5 seconds of thinking to see that the entire point of paying for sexual favors IS telling another person what to do with their own body and controlling their sexuality.
A whole Marxist analysis of capitalism isn’t needed to see that the payment is pressure, just common sense. The transaction is made precisely because the individual doesn’t want the sex act, wouldn’t freely do it, and otherwise would not partake in it.
Read 7 tweets
1 May
Sex Buyer – Die Unsichtbaren Männer dieunsichtbarenmaenner.wordpress.com/tag/sex-buyer/
They know full well it’s not women’s choice. Lol sexbuyers admitting what “sex workers’ rights” advocates will not 🤭
Note the dehumanization: not “asylum-seeker” as in the person but “asylum-seeker pussy” as in the body part. That’s how men who buy sex view women.
Read 20 tweets
29 Apr
I cropped the translation of @HuschkeMau’s blog post for easy sharing. Image
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
17 Mar
Empowerment and how LibFems get it wrong. 🧵
EmPOWERment literally means gaining power. But third wave feminism has shifted the meaning of this very simple word to something like “gives good feelings”. This is not only plain wrong, but actively undermines feminism and retards women’s liberation.
You know that meme “modesty empowers some women, nudity empowers some women”? It’s kinda wrong. Bearing or hiding flesh provides no power, and depending on the context they can be degrading. It should be “modesty makes some women comfortable, nudity makes some women comfortable”.
Read 16 tweets
15 Mar
I’ve been seeing the “‘sex workers’ redistribute funds to marginalized communities” talking point pop up on pimp shill Twitter, and a fucking ancom I was schooling in DMs on Instagram said that shit, so imma address this. Two main things.
First of all, literally no. Pimps keep almost all the fucking money and the sex trade leaves women more impoverished than before dumbass. It’s literally redistributing funds FROM marginalized women TO the privileged rich white men who run this entire shitshow.
Then second of all, even if that was true? That’s not a justification. The US military actually does redistribute funds to marginalized communities via the poor black and brown men who are economically coerced into joining it, but no leftist worth their salt defends that shit.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(