This is to say thanks to the many medicos who'v been, at great risk of bein abused by trolls, callin out misogyny & sexism in medical circles. Not to mention calling out religious & casteist bigotry which is as prevalent in the medical field as elsewhere in India today.
Thanks also to those who shared stories of how sexism & misogyny hav been trivialized & normalized in the profession (eg this tweet). Sad to see many medicos still refusing to acknowledge these issues & instead choosing to blame feminism, "wokeism" etc
I am sure ther r other medicos who desire to learn & expand their understanding. Since Twitter can be a tricky place to learn such stuff, esp with many so-called influencers actually being bigoted duds, talking directly to decent colleagues around is a better way to go.
I entered MBBS with a lot of problematic notions at age 18, many of which I abandoned in the course of 3-4 yrs, & many still later, mainly following helpful, enlightening conversations with fellow women friends & colleagues.
A pertinent historical example in this respect is about a common, normalized notion from the 1950s-60s: it was considered completely fine for eminent male doctors and commentators to say stuff like women medical students must resolve to "stay unmarried for ten more years.”
This 1953 statement, by a politician named HP Mody, stemmed from a v widespread belief that women doctors were "wasting" medical seats, because once they were married they had to look after "family responsibilities" and "exit" out of the medical profession.
Such "wisdom" obviously passed on to young medicos. In 1963 an MBBS grad remarked, in the student magazine of a college, that the number of women doctors in the country was reaching “alarming proportions.” He proposed reducing girl students’ admission numbers in medical colleges.
As we kno well from today's highly polarized world, just cz a lot of people believe in & normalize a concept, that doesnt mean its true or logical. In this case, ppl simply believed in lazy assumptions based on shaky anecdotal data, that married women docs left practice en masse
Despite the absence of strong evidence, this notion continued to hold sway, with even Defence Min VK Krishna Menon commenting on it in 1957.
Women docs of that period, however, made sure that they registered their protest against this awfully discriminatory & unfair discourse
The president of Bombay-based Association of Medical Women in India, eminent obgy Jerusha Jhirad, wrote at least two letters to the Times of India busting prevailing myths about women docs, using rational argumentation as well as survey data.
She showed, eg, that out of all women docs in Bombay, 60% happened to b married - & wer doin their job perfectly well. She wrote that ppl unfairly generalized d examples of a few women docs who had stopped practice & at the same time ignored examples of men doctors who did d same
While ppl arguing for capping women docs' numbers did believe they were being logical, even patriotic - the "nation" needed more efficient & practising doctors, after all - it is clear that they were jus acting on entrenched sexist attitudes & biased understandings.
The present-day posting of sexist memes etc by Twitter docs, & their refusal to back down, is one more manifestation of such entrenched attitudes in society & in d medical field. But while sexism has remained entrenched, it is true that resistance to it has also been consistent.
There's many non-factual elements here as @sarayupani has pointed out, & many lazy assumptions as @Shehla_Rashid's brave timeline shows.
But it is clear that there r several folks who think this way. So here's my two cents on this phenomenon of privileged Hindu savior complex.
When a person or a group around us is being oppressed, most of us speak out and protest not to do THEM a favor, but bcz we find the act of oppression abhorrent & an assault on basic human values. We r sending a message more to the oppressor than the oppressed..
Yes it's imp for the oppressed to know they're not alone, but it is also imp for the oppressor to know that they ARE alone, that we do not support their actions and ideas. And in that sense, when we privileged speak up (whether for Muslims or other oppressed groups)...
An awesome pleasure of reading academic scholarship is that we begin to look at things we previously thought we knew well, in totally new and different ways. One of many such enlightening instances for me was reading Venera R. Khalikova's 2017 article on Ramdev. (1/n)
There is a lot of excellent research in the article, and i will focus only on a few points from it. As we all know, Ramdev began as a Yoga guru. Khalikova says that India has had many yoga gurus in the past who have done much to bring yoga to the ordinary Indian (and foreigner)..
.."but Ramdev’s success in reaching out to large audiences is truly unprecedented because it is based on the spread of mass media and the growing availability of communication technologies since India’s economic liberalisation."
The venerable @OmairTAhmad, in a recent thread, perfectly analyzd differential attitudes of privileged Indians to Covid in 2020 & 21
To his point that India mishandled d first, but it was largely d poor who paid d price, "so u didn't care," here's some some public health history
Ppl seem to think that now that the problematic situation of our healthcare is out ther for every1 to see, the elites & ruling classes will take health reform seriously.
However, there rarely is a “trickle-up” of activist sentiments and intellectual rationale into elite circles.
Most privileged Indians indeed r furious wit whats happening. But for many, this anger springs from the individually-oriented PEEVE that healthcare is too pricey &/or inaccessible for them, & not the universally oriented PRINCIPLE tht everyone deserves quality and affordable care
Came across two imp articles explaining in detail how Modi & his cronies have completely messed up the best chance Indian people had against Covid - vaccination.
Ppl still seem to not realize how big & serious this f*ck-up is, but when they do, hope they also realize this:
When Congress proposed the idea of the welfarist NYAY, ppl mercilessly mocked them. But it was a bold political move. Clearly if UPA wer in power today, vaccines wudv been centrally procured, free, & walk-ins allowed
Boldness needs to b in d direction of welfare, not destruction
When we talk about BJP & modi's obsession with perceptions & the accompanying propaganda, let's also remember that this propaganda works in the reverse way too: muddying the perception of opposition parties, esp Congress. Many hav fallen prey to that, & it's high time we realized
Ther hav been a lot of tweets on this in the past few days. Wheth we call it Indian Medical Service #IMS or All India Health cadre #AIHC etc, looks like ppl think that having doctors in charge of medical decisions is the need of the hour.
I even came across a little meme showing Anthony Fauci on one side, with his plethora of medical degrees, & the dull Lav Agarwal on the other, with (the meme said) a B. Tech degree. This obv makes for a compelling argument, esp for young medicos.
There's a lot to be unpacked here, and I think will be in the coming days by many others. Here r my two cents:
A 'Harvard study' says that "Yogi's UP" was "heaven on earth" for migrants.
Over d last few days, we have been seeing such headlines all over Indian media.
But there's a catch: None of these reports mentions the authors' names, the study's title, & where to find d actual study
Harvard Univ already has a lot of baggage, recently in terms of many graduates workin for d Trump admin.. I m sure they do not want to extend this baggage to hateful, divisive, violent regimes elsewher. The content of d news reports makes it clear that if such a Harvard study..
.. exists, it wasn't primarily done for academic reasons.
Or maybe it was, in which case it would be really great if @Harvard or @HarvardChanSPH make sure that the study is made publicly available so that other experts can assess how valid its observations & conclusions are.