We’re making a mistake constantly yelling around about “authoritarianism.”

Voters in the middle don’t know what that means, don’t believe it, and don’t care.

They hate incompetence, extremism, and embarrassments.

High minded words like “authoritarianism” just bounce off them.
Even if you try to explain to voters in the middle what “authoritarianism” is, you won’t get anywhere. They won’t buy it. It’s like when conservatives thought they could win in 2012 by painting Obama as a “dictator.” Voters in the middle just laugh at “other side is evil” claims.
Besides, once you get bogged down in having to define terms, you’ve already lost the argument. Liberals make this mistake over and over again, fighting dictionary battles that don’t actually sway anyone.
Trump lost badly l in 2020 because voters in the middle decided he was an embarrassing inept jackass who screwed up everything he touched. Not because they thought he was some all powerful “authoritarian” figure. Voters in the middle like winners. They decided Trump was a loser.
Republicans are doing everything they can to hand us victory in 2022. They’re married to Trump; voters in the middle hate him. Their new faces are embarrassments like Boebert and Geene, and an alleged child rapist in Gaetz.

Instead of using this, we just yell “authoritarianism!”
The problem is that 95% of liberal pundits are only trying to make themselves look judicious, rather than trying to help their side win. So they push high minded but useless concepts like “authoritarianism” when they should be saying “look at these clueless Republican clowns!”
It’s on YOU to tune out these useless liberal pundits. It’s on you to approach voters in the middle with the things that THEY care about, not what you think they should care about..

You won’t find one persuadable voter who gives a fuck about “authoritarianism.” Not one.
So do you want to win the dictionary, or do you want to win the midterms? Because you can’t do both. If you want to win the midterms, put your vocabulary away, and focus on the GOP being the party of Trump, Boebert, Greene, and Gaetz. THAT is how you get votes for the Democrats.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

11 Jul
Right wingers don’t understand right or wrong, true or false. They only understand winning or losing, strong or weak. Want to break their spirit? Drive home to them that Trump and the GOP are weak inept losers, and that until they give up Trump and the GOP, they’re also losers.
Many rural Americans think the rest of the country looks down on them. And they’re right – but they’re wrong about why. They think it’s because they’re rural, poor, didn’t go to college. Not at all. Americans only look down on them because of their vile right wing agenda.
Mainstream Americans correctly look down on right wingers for their racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, uncaring, often violent stances. People who express these views are in fact garbage. They cease being garbage if and when they disavow these views.
Read 7 tweets
5 Jul
1) Many of you have asked why so many loons (most of them on the LEFT, not the right) have come out of the woodwork the past few weeks to stalk me and spread conspiracy theories about me. Well, it began when news broke that a grand jury was empaneled to bring Trump indictments.
2) For years, numerous liberal pundits big and small have built their brand around insisting Trump would get away with it all (it scares you into paying attention to them). Many of these pundits spent years loudly mocking me for daring to say that Trump would end up indicted.
3) In fact a whole lot of liberal pundits – ranging from the pundits at major news sites, to the obscure wannabe pundits who just the troll bigger liberal pundits for a living – spent years building their brand by telling their liberal audiences that Palmer Report was fake news.
Read 16 tweets
4 Jul
If Weisselberg does end up flipping, he’ll still spend every minute between now and then trying to convince everyone (us, prosecutors, even himself) that he’ll never flip. So you can’t say “He hired this lawyer, filed this paperwork, it means he’ll never flip.” Not how it works.
If you plan to go on a trip, you’re going to do everything that needs to be done in order to go on that trip, even if you think it might fall through. You’ll buy a ticket when you need to, and so on. You might do it all with an eye toward being able to undo it. But you do it.
Of course Weisselberg has hired attorneys with a speciality of fighting these kinds of charges. If he failed to hire these kinds of attorneys, he’d be closing the door to fighting this. And for now he still wants to fight it. Tells us nothing about whether he’ll flip later.
Read 4 tweets
4 Jul
When Trump was in office, he knew he could block federal prosecution, so he’d confess to his crimes and try to play them down. For him it was a PR game. That’s why he confessed last night. But he apparently forgot he’s no longer in office and is vulnerable to prosecution. Oops 😆
We’ll see if New York prosecutors view Trump’s confession last night as having been direct enough to use as evidence. But either way, he’s flaunting his crimes at this point, which surely deepens the resolve of those prosecutors to see this through and indict him.
Does Trump honestly believe he’s still in office?

Is he unaware that these are state, not federal, charges?

Has he ever understood the difference?
Read 7 tweets
3 Jul
We just caught a Wikipedia editor saying this in the talk section: "If a majority of the Palmer Report's peers (or rivals/competitors) call the blog a conspiracy site, then Wikipedia is obligated to follow their lead." Think we now have grounds for serious legal action.
This Wikipedia editor keeps digging himself a deeper hole.

Now he's insisting that I'm "not fully there look up blue anon if you have to And the fact the evidence shows all there that he is a conspiracy theorist."

Huh?

Again this is a Wikipedia editor talking in public 🙄
This same Wikipedia editor is continuing to falsely claim that I tried to "doxx" him – which I obviously did not. Yet another individual who's so obsessed with destroying me, he's willing to risk destroying himself in the process. Profoundly disturbing.
Read 9 tweets
3 Jul
It’s been clear since November 2019 that if Trump lost reelection, he’d end up on a path to prison in New York.

It’s not “speculative” or a “conspiracy theory” to say that Donald Trump is going to prison. It’s the real story. It has been for a year and a half. Now it’s underway.
Stop acting like Palmer Report is doing something weird by saying it. Stop asking why we’ve been the only one saying it for the past year and a half. Start asking the rest of the media why they spent all that time ignoring the fact that New York indictments would come if he lost.
This week’s indictments, which are an obvious precursor for Trump himself being indicted, were always going to happen. Always. Why do you think New York went after his tax returns and banking records and such? This has been an ongoing active criminal investigation since 2019.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(