Since the indictment was filed against the Trump Org. and Allen Weisselberg, there’s been lots of media spin and lying (and some misunderstanding) about the indictment.

Here I dissect the lies (and misunderstandings) and why they matter.


1/
Here’s an edited transcription if you prefer to read:
terikanefield.com/the-trump-org-…

I'll come back after a bit more ☕️ and write a Twitter Summary hitting the main points.

2/
Last week I talked about the bogus legal defenses being offered on behalf of the Trump Org and Weisselberg.

It’s easy to mock the stupid legal arguments offered by Team Trump. He usually loses in court. He lost all those elections cases.

3/
But he wins in the Court of Right-Wing Opinion, and that makes him dangerous.

Last week, he gave a speech that was widely circulated. I transcribed an important snippet.

He effectively mischaracterized the indictment.

4/
The indictment said this (#1) and Trump said this (#2)

There's a big difference between driving a company car and getting 2 free Mercedez Benz automobiles

(actually sort of more because they were leased, so I assume Weisselberg and wife always drove a new car)

5/
About the "company apartment," the indictment said this (#1) and Trump said this (#2)

Staying overnight in a company apartment when you work late and don’t want to go home is quite different from living rent-free (and tax-free) in Manhattan for 15 years.

6/
Trump spun an indictment for 15 counts of tax fraud and falsification of records this way ⤵️

One poll showed that 51% of voters think this prosecution was politically motivated. It's only one poll and it's early in the process, but still. thehill.com/hilltv/what-am…

7/
I felt the need to take on what feels like a Sacred Truth of Twitter, which goes like this (if I understand many of the comments I get):

Trump World keeps criming because they never face consequences. The implication is that if they do face consequences, they’ll stop.

8/
I say baloney. Hitler was in prison and then went on to become Chancellor of Germany. Anyone who voted for Trump in 2020 had enough evidence that Trump was a lawbreaker, but they didn’t care.

Didn't Manafort keep committing crimes in prison? (I couldn't find a link)

9/
They commit crimes because it’s the only way they have to gain wealth and power. And without wealth and power, they are nothing.

Some of Trump’s hardcore supporters don’t care if he cheats or steals because they like what he’s trying to do.

10/
Some like his lawbreaking because they want to destroy.

Some just like lawbreaking. Can you imagine these guys saying, “Trump is in trouble with the law, so let’s all learn to play nice.”

11/
From @ruthbenghiat’s book, leaders like Trump fall from influence and power when conservative elites stop propping them up.

The important question is: What will cause the elites to stop propping Trump up?

Another Sacred Truth of Twitter is about Lindsay Graham's about-face.
12/
In 2016 he said this (#1) and now he says this (#2).

What changed is that he saw how Trump was able to mobilize and get people to the polls who usually don't vote. Trump reached to the people the GOP was previously afraid of openly embracing.

13/
The moderates fled and now the GOP is dependent on votes from guys like ⤵️. Without them, the GOP elites see no path forward.

Trump has also taught Republicans how to perfect the art of disinformation. He illustrated the effectiveness of the Firehose of Falsehoods method.
14/
The GOP elites prop Trump up because it is in their best interests (politically and financially) to do so.

When it is no longer in their best interests, they will stop.

The idea is to make it no longer in their best interests. There are multiple ways, but no easy way.

15/
One way is if in the coming indictments Trump is no longer able to spin them. (I'm in the group that believes there will be more).

Some things get harder to spin.

16/
There's a big difference between a rich guy cheating once in a while (which is what it looks like now to his supporters) and a crook who is only wealthy because he cheats.

I'll stop here because this is getting long and I hit most of the main points.

17/
Here is the key: A certain percentage of the people will stick with him no matter what, and that includes certain elected officials who are Trump wannabes.

But the Republican Party is already a minority party with shrinking demographics . . .


18/
The behavior you see as they try to rig elections comes from desperation because their numbers are shrinking.

Reportedly, after the insurrection, more people peeled off and changed their voter registration.

19/
Maybe not a lot, but if you're a minority party and you start losing any percentage, you're in trouble.

There's a huge difference between winning 46% of the vote nationwide and 43 or 44%.

20/
The problem is that as they shrink they'll become more dangerous because they'll become even more dependent on these guys ⤵️for money and support.

But keeping control does get harder with shrinking numbers-- as long as everyone else stays engaged and motivated.

21/
This is a perfect summary of the GOP situation. Many true conservatives have left, but there remains a small number who've always identified as Republican, who don't want to vote otherwise, and who keep finding ways to rationalize it. . . until they can't.
Trying to persuade them won't help. They have to finally feel confronted with something they can't rationalize.

I saw it with people I know who identify as conservative. It took some longer than others. Some will stay through thick and thin. Some will reach their limits.

Sorry this is getting so long, but I responded to a comment here ⤵️ It continues the Lindsay Graham discussion.

I didn't name the Sacred Truth of Twitter, but you all knew I meant the Kompromat theory.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

13 Jul
Yes, because Republican policies are unpopular. If the discussion is fact or policy based Republicans
will lose, so they need to keep everyone riled up.
The right-wing is only part of the reason you're exhausted.

Stick with me here.

The right-wing has to create an endless cycle of crises because they have no other way to 'govern.' They have to keep their supporters scared and you outraged . . .

. . . which creates a feedback loop of sorts. When the left is outraged, the right gets stoked.

The other problem is social media algorithsm.

If I tweet: "Democracy is hanging by a thread! We don't have much time! This is a crisis!" I will get lots of clicks.
Read 6 tweets
11 Jul
Yes, and the 'kompromat' theory gives them way too much credit. It assumes that if not for kompromat, they'd do the right thing.

And it's not like they hide their cheating.

The kompromat theory is reverse projection. Good people can't believe they do this stuff willingly.
Exactly.


It isn't kompromat. It's what @ruthbenghiat describes in her book.

Once a politician does anything to help or shield a Trump-type leader, they have a hard time pulling back. They get roped in. I'll put the screenshot in the next tweet.
From her book, Strongmen: From Mussolini to the present\

Once they help him in any way, they can feel stuck. It's hard to back out because they've now alienated everyone except the hardcore extremists.

I felt that way when Hawley punched his fist toward the crowd that day . . .
Read 4 tweets
5 Jul
An observation about the Trump Org indictment: The criminal scheme was described as ongoing as of June 30, 2021.

Even when they knew they were being investigated, they kept cheating.
The arrogance is stunning. I did a brief stint years ago in a firm that represented white-collar clients, and I did see that attitude. They thought they were "pushing the envelope" and it was no big deal.

A task of the lawyers was to persuade them that they were in big trouble.
I think this is exactly right. It's the only way he has ever earned money. The Trumps don't add value. They take advantage of situations. He floats on debt; he borrows against assets he inflates. His "product" is his "brand."

He thinks he's clever.

Read 4 tweets
5 Jul
I've been thinking about this defense of the Trump Org. by the National Review, which dovetails with Trump's monologue about how not paying taxes on tuition for grandchildren is no big deal.

Ignore the lies in this piece for a moment and consider the underlying argument. . .
1/
It's about what kind of laws we should have and the purpose of the criminal justice system.

It's the idea behind MAGA: Take America back to the time when [white] men could cheat (the 1890s).

When Trump breaks the laws they don't think should exist, his supporters cheer.

2/
The criminal justice system as existed before the 1960s really had the purpose of putting Black men in jail. It was a way of getting around the 13th Amendment (which gave an exception to forced labor: conviction for a crime).

3/
Read 8 tweets
4 Jul
Ever since the Trump Org / Weisselberg Indictment was filed, I've been tweeting about some of the [bogus] defenses being put forward in the media.

I gathered my thoughts and put them into a video.
I'll post an edited transcript shortly.


1/
Here's an edited transcription: terikanefield.com/the-trump-orga…

The video was a bit longer than my usual video (almost 16 minutes!)

But it's totally not my fault!
It's because there are so many bogus defenses out there.

2/
By amazing coincidence, I talked about this one in my video.

But I don't think people like this ⤵️are actually interested in the difference between political prosecution (which abandons rule of law) and rule of law prosecution (grounded in facts and evidence).

3/
Read 9 tweets
2 Jul
I'm skeptical about the idea that Weisselberg's testimony is necessary to establish criminal intent (for Trump and his kids).

Just look at Trump's history.

Circumstantial evidence is often used to prove criminal intent. law.cornell.edu/wex/intent
Depends on what you mean by "really hard."

Prisons are filled with people who were convicted based on circumstantial evidence.

Unless a person confesses, you need some circumstantial evidence.

Testimony also isn't 100% reliable.
Witnesses don't always tell the truth.
Juries don't always believe the witness.
Witnesses who "flip" were usually involved in the criminal scheme, so their testimony can also be suspect.

Documentary evidence is harder to discredit. Witnesses can help connect the dots.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(