It isn't kompromat. It's what @ruthbenghiat describes in her book.
Once a politician does anything to help or shield a Trump-type leader, they have a hard time pulling back. They get roped in. I'll put the screenshot in the next tweet.
From her book, Strongmen: From Mussolini to the present\
Once they help him in any way, they can feel stuck. It's hard to back out because they've now alienated everyone except the hardcore extremists.
I felt that way when Hawley punched his fist toward the crowd that day . . .
There was no backing out. That fist pump would be forever used against him by anyone who is not an extremist. All he could do was double down. Or lose elections.
They choose power over doing the right thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, because Republican policies are unpopular. If the discussion is fact or policy based Republicans
will lose, so they need to keep everyone riled up.
The right-wing is only part of the reason you're exhausted.
Stick with me here.
The right-wing has to create an endless cycle of crises because they have no other way to 'govern.' They have to keep their supporters scared and you outraged . . .
Since the indictment was filed against the Trump Org. and Allen Weisselberg, there’s been lots of media spin and lying (and some misunderstanding) about the indictment.
Here I dissect the lies (and misunderstandings) and why they matter.
An observation about the Trump Org indictment: The criminal scheme was described as ongoing as of June 30, 2021.
Even when they knew they were being investigated, they kept cheating.
The arrogance is stunning. I did a brief stint years ago in a firm that represented white-collar clients, and I did see that attitude. They thought they were "pushing the envelope" and it was no big deal.
A task of the lawyers was to persuade them that they were in big trouble.
I think this is exactly right. It's the only way he has ever earned money. The Trumps don't add value. They take advantage of situations. He floats on debt; he borrows against assets he inflates. His "product" is his "brand."
I've been thinking about this defense of the Trump Org. by the National Review, which dovetails with Trump's monologue about how not paying taxes on tuition for grandchildren is no big deal.
Ignore the lies in this piece for a moment and consider the underlying argument. . . 1/
It's about what kind of laws we should have and the purpose of the criminal justice system.
It's the idea behind MAGA: Take America back to the time when [white] men could cheat (the 1890s).
When Trump breaks the laws they don't think should exist, his supporters cheer.
2/
The criminal justice system as existed before the 1960s really had the purpose of putting Black men in jail. It was a way of getting around the 13th Amendment (which gave an exception to forced labor: conviction for a crime).
3/
The video was a bit longer than my usual video (almost 16 minutes!)
But it's totally not my fault!
It's because there are so many bogus defenses out there.
2/
By amazing coincidence, I talked about this one in my video.
But I don't think people like this ⤵️are actually interested in the difference between political prosecution (which abandons rule of law) and rule of law prosecution (grounded in facts and evidence).
Witnesses don't always tell the truth.
Juries don't always believe the witness.
Witnesses who "flip" were usually involved in the criminal scheme, so their testimony can also be suspect.
Documentary evidence is harder to discredit. Witnesses can help connect the dots.