π΄Southgate bottled it after taking lead. No lessons learned from Croatia.
π΄Time taken to unleash subs was criminal, Mancini was proactive.
π΄Subbing Immobile changed the game
England fired out of the blocks. Italy did not expect English wing back to push up high from both flanks, let alone Kyle Walker making a surprise foray forward to outnumber Italy on the blindside.
Italy shifted across in haste, this time leaving space on the other flank.
England then began to play on the counter which was fine, as Chiesa was the only real threat. What a threat he was though, I have rarely seen Luke Shaw troubled as he was.
Chiesa's 1 v 1 ability is truly special, very direct and reminds me of Andrei Kanchelskis.
As we can see England's low block was very difficult to break down with Immobile in the side. He was not dynamic or skilful enough to trouble English centre backs and Insigne was too predictable from the left spot even if he did bring others into play very well.
Outnumbered.
Italy changed it up and put Insigne as a false 9 and another nippy wide forward in Berardi. This shook England up, as suddenly all of Italy's front three can beat men 1 v 1 and attract defenders.
England refused to get out of the low block and invited waves of pressure.
Gareth made some subs reluctantly but the first two I agreed with, but by not bringing on Grealish early enough - England's midfield just lacked any real quality or thrust. It was a workmanlike midfield lacking in pizzazz and they also lacked a central thrust.
This is what I would have gone with. DCL to take on the ageing legs of Italy, Sterling as a 10 to take on Jorginho and Grealish out wide much earlier. I would have brought on Bellingham, a box to box player who would be useful on the counter and Phillips was tiring.
Penalty subs... Do not mind that. Rashford missing? fine, he's a regular for United - shit happens.
Sancho? hmm, barely features under Gareth and has scored 1PK in 3 seasons at Dortmund? Saka... what on earth were these lads doing in the first 5 takers?
Did we practise this?
Left with a bitter taste. Southgate is the best manager we have had since Hoddle. However, the squad he has is stacked and he still has not solved the issue of being unable to control games against the best sides WITH THE BALL.
He lacks ability to forge elite midfields.
His trust in players like Rice and Dier previously in 2018 worries me. They are effective to some degree, but we need to be looking at guys who are genuine playmakers and can also defend. It should not be an either or situation, we can and must find both in one player.
He needs to be braver with subs and do it earlier. Make the most of your talented pool of players, do not just grind it out - stick your chest out, back the players in these pressure situations rather than worry about them making a mistake.
Want to know how Italians win ugly?
Italian's very rarely defend and just stay in the low block. They nearly always seek to offer something on the counter, and they also know when to step out of it and control the game if need be. They also are efficient in possession out of the low block and never just hoof it.
A big thank you for all those who have followed and retweeted our work during these Euros. The team will be taking a well-earned break and will look to come back with a bang.
Arrivederci my friends and do check out our work at:
π΄Southgate releases the shackles in extra time, learns from 2018 (Foden, Grealish and Sterling to the right)
π΄Saka did not hold width - England too lopsided
π΄Kane in Spurs mode
England made a blistering start, once again combining down the left. The mids went wide in order to progress the play and Shaw's wonderful one touch flicks and passes kept finding Sterling.
It soon got clocked on to and Denmark shifted across, flooding that area with bodies.
Saka was poor outside of the assist.
He was too narrow and did not run at Maehle and Vestgaard enough out wide. With Walker not overlapping, England's attack down that side was non existent.
Considering Italy's weakness is down the left - this needs sorting.
As expected England sat back in the opening exchanges - feeling their way into the new shape and frustrating the Germans early doors (notorious for their fast starts and putting teams away).
Now out of the opening period, England begin to take control of the game. At this stage they had 66% possession and were winning the ball in midfield areas as well as at times inside the German half.
An intriguing feature of #EURO2020 is how teams adapt their pressing strategy depending on the game state.
Teams rarely stay as a low block or press like mad men all game.
Here is a look at #ITA defensive actions heat map in different stages of their QF v Belgium.
[THREAD]
In the first 15 minutes, the Italians keep it tight with the focus on keeping KDB quiet - the opposition dangerman.
There is a slight attempt now to win the ball higher up the pitch but most of the action takes place in their penalty area - suggests a lowish block and inviting pressure.
π΄If can't defend - do not just sit back and expect numbers to work in your favour
π΄England press reset button at half time and go for the jugular
π΄Gareth's faith in Kane - Justified!
Shevchenko turned what is a lightweight but proactive Ukrainian side into a low block 5-3-2 side. These players lacked the natural instincts and familiarity with the set up to make it work.
England had men who go inside and outside - Spain take notice of how to beat low block.
After the first goal, Walker did not get forward enough which did enable Ukraine to frustrate us in the first half as it allowed their defence to stay more compact.
Shame they failed to do this with the first goal..
- Denmark's off the ball movement crucial in the final third
- Czech Republic lack central passing options in the middle to final third
- How Denmark exploits Czech Republic's poor press