Well, I took a chance once tonight. Here's another risky topic: slavery in an economic, wider context. But again - read a little before you assume you know what I'm saying. Please.
Why did men want slaves?
2. Men wanted slaves so they could control and reap the harvest of more land than they could manage with their own bodies, minds, families and community.
Why do men want tractors? So they could control and reap the harvest of more land than they can manage with their own ...
3. I read a report lately that humans actually feel as if the tools we use are parts of our bodies.
No shit. I guarantee my nervous system extends to the end of a wrench around on the back side of a transmission where I can't see it. It's just more me.
4. So, everybody in the developed world has these things which are half extensions to our body and half slaves that never talk back. Tools with motors on them. We have superhuman powers.
So we can extend our personal control over more Earth than we could otherwise.
5. I routinely go 60 miles one way to do some thing I want to do.
And the two most likely ones are, from here, in different directions by about 160°. So, 120 mile radius.
That's a big hunk of world. One guy. One face.
6. Next is a video of a process that took me about the same amount of time as driving up to Jamesport to do business with Amish people.
Amish people offer services you pretty much can't get anywhere else. They know things nobody else knows.
But - here's how far you get on foot.
7. Here's how far I get on foot in the time it takes me to drive to Kansas City or Jamesport.
8. Back around to slavery.
Slavery was a great evil. Under slavery, humans were forced to endure the most degraded, depraved circumstances imaginable. One of the worst slavery systems I know of was the African enslavement in this nation.
It harmed more than the slaves, as well.
9. No non-slave-owning person on the land could compete on an equal footing with the slaveholders.
It was the mom-and-pop store against Walmart.
Slavery was the foundation of a broadly evil system, not a narrowly evil system.
When slavery "ended" we said,
10. "OK you're free, take the clothes on your back and the shoes on your feet and get the fuck off my land and go somewhere, or you could stay here and farm and I'll keep most of everything."
Words to that effect.
Sharecropping.
But technically you could leave and they couldn't
11. chase you down with hounds, so yes, it was better.
We could have done better yet. But the system was, the richest man gets the best of everything, then the next richest man gets the best of everything that's left, and at each level, the more land you could hog for yourself,
12. And profit from yourself, the better that was.
And Devil take the hindmost.
In the first place - and everybody knows this - the black people have never been let into the game, and in the second place, fewer white people are allowed in every year too.
13. And instead of whipping bleeding wounds into the backs of humans to force them to work for them, the rich pour death into the air and water, pour debt into the employee class, and jet off to near space just because they can.
I'd be lying if I said I wish the motherfucker well
14. The deepest and most pervasive evil in all of slavery was the greed to grab more than one could hold, and claim it to oneself. The rest all stemmed from that.
I have read that Bill Gates owns more American farmland than any other man on Earth.
I don't wish him well either.
Errata: in 5, diameter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm going to ramble a bit this afternoon on and around the topic of the ecosystem catastrophe we choose to call climate change.
Some of us refer to it as "The Anthropocene," but I think that's a misnomer.
Ought to be "Industriocene."
We were Anthro for a quarter million years.
2. Twitter is full of #ActOnClimate#ActNow and everybody knows what "act" means.
It means build and install a vast global electro-mechanical overlay in addition to the ones we have already built.
Can we agree on that?
When we say, "We have the technology," we don't mean,
3. you know, *have* the technology, as in, I have three donkeys. Have and can point at. Have in terms of physical reality.
We mean, "We have built a small model of the technology we think will enable us to power the entire industrial economy without emitting CO2."
Have. Not.
If you want to see my brain damage in action, watch the latest video.
I have mirror image failures. I tell you we're going to look at the right side when we're going to look at the left.
And I have trouble pulling out nouns. Writing is easier in that way than speaking.
2. I spend the whole day confused about the word for cart. I call it a bench and I don't know what all.
I'm talking along and I just cannot think of the name of something. The noun. The word that means, This object.
Drives me crazy.
I'll get so stuck I'll have to Google descr.
3. Writing comes from a slightly different place in the brain than speech.
The hole in my brain is right near - like almost on top of - the speech center.
I lose my temper, too. I hate that. I'm not a person I would like at all in that mode. Struggle to control it.
This is one of those topics that pisses people off, but I ask that you read into a ways before you dump a load of shit on me.
That topic is: the Bible.
What I think the Bible is, really, actually, is the oral history of the agricultural revolution written down by memory later.
2. I think it's useful, but not in any way The Word Of God.
We know, pretty much for sure, that about six to eight thousand years ago, right there where the events are staged, people invented annual grain agriculture and civilization.
Can we agree on that?
3. The Garden of Eden was the previous quarter million years in that same region.
The Forbidden Fruit is annual grain. Wheat or barley or whichever one came first.
Since then we have gained our livelihood by the sweat of our brow.
This is one reasonable person asking another reasonable person a sensible question, and getting a sensible answer.
John in Twitter-know, Thomas I'm just meeting.
Hello, Thomas.
An answer follows. A thread.
The math is horrible. I will grant you that it may be too late no matter what we do. However, I don't see anyplace to go from there, and, in the immortal words of John Carter of Barsoom, "We still live."
There is, I believe, one power vast enough to get us out of this mess, Life.
There is an established norm regarding weather reporting. Each article must carry the mandatory disclaimer, a statement that no individual weather event can be attributed to climate change because "we can't know."
This is how to lie with true words.
Allow me to explain.
2. All weather is caused directly by energy in the atmosphere. Absent energy there would be no weather.
That said, the atmosphere is so complex that we are not able to track the path the energy takes directly to the rainfall, or the wind, or the temperature increase or decrease.
3. Roughly we know. We can explain it in block diagram form, in rule-of-thumb form, but not absolutely specifically.
We do know one thing for sure, though: more energy must, in all cases, result in more action. Energy causes action. That is how the whole universe works. Always.