So TYT and Jimmy Dore are feuding because Ana Kasparian sexually harassed Dore and later tried to blackmail him?
Not sure what Cenk and Ana’s point is.
So, Jimmy Dore worked at The Young Turks for years, but left in the past couple of years and started his own show. Lately, he’s been pretty critical of TYT.
Seven years ago, Ana Kasparian was wearing a micro-skirt at the TYT news office [sic], and flashing her ass at everyone in the room. Jimmy Dore said “Nice news skirt, Ana!” and everyone laughed at her.
Now, seven years later, Ana sent a text DM to Jimmy Dore saying that in light of his talking bad about TYT, she was going to “go public” about this skirt event, on the grounds that it was Dore “sexually harassing” Ana.
Dore, not appreciating this attempt at blackmail, preemptively went public with the incident.
It obviously wasn’t “sexual harassment.” At least not by Dore. Ana waving her bare ass around might be …
So, anyway, they’re at war now, and the far left media-sphere is taking sides — because of course they are, because far leftists can’t not try to decide in all case who is “more pure than thou.”
Since I hate them all … good.
Watching enemies go to war with enemies is sweet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
This is easily shown to be FALSE.
Thus: A accuses B of wronging her. C does not know whether A’s accusation is true or false.
If B did wrong A in the manner accused, there is a situation of injustice.
If not, then A has falsely accused B, and there is a situation of injustice.
C being neutral is not unjust.
The neutrality of C is the foundation of DUE PROCESS. Neither A nor B have any claim on C’s allegiance, so long as C is in a state of ignorance regarding the particulars, even though C knows that EITHER A OR B has acted unjustly, and so there is ‘a situation of injustice.'
“Most important, and of greatest concern, was how intelligents thought. An intelligent signed on to a set of beliefs regarded as totally certain, scientifically proven, and absolutely obligatory for any moral person.”
“A strict intelligent had to subscribe to some ideology—whether populist, Marxist, or anarchist—that was committed to the total destruction of the existing order and its replacement by a utopia that would, at a stroke, eliminate every human ill.”
“The mentality of the intelligentsia constituted a cruel parody of religion, preserving “the external features of religiosity without its content.”
“What is it? It is, I’d argue, the sudden, rapid, stunning shift in the belief system of the American elites. It has sent the whole society into a profound cultural dislocation.”
“It is, in essence, an ongoing moral panic against the specter of “white supremacy,” which is now bizarrely regarded as an accurate description of the largest, freest, most successful multiracial democracy in human history.”
Nothing so far has made America accept Communism — but a race war might.
Well, most of us won’t accept it, but our elites might.
If America falls to Race Communism, it will achieve what Communism always achieves: totalitarian terror, misery, mass murder, the end of freedom, and incalculable human suffering — for a century or so, until it collapses under its own evil weight.