People of the several states simply fail to understand that the system of law they are currently under is not in perfect model of the original constitutional system established by the founding fathers. But in a vast and sick sense -IT IS.
2) These particulars need to be looked at for understanding.
From what has been gone over herein, you should now understand that an insurgent is one that breaks the law of his government. In the case of the 14th Amendment, the amendment could not have been lawfully ratified.
3) To further explain, we look to Article V of the United States Constitution. This article requires the number of three-quarters of the states is needed to put an amendment into lawful force and effect.
(NOTE: The 14th Amendment was NEVER lawfully ratified).
See image 👇👇
4) How can this be done if there were an absence of lawful governments to do so?
That is to say, how may lawful states be removed and then have puppet governments pass law at the fancy of the United States? So, do you still pose.
5) How are the termed insurgents breaking the law? For starters, the state constitutions after 1860 have been altered to suit the mandates of the unlawful 14th Amendment, (source: Of course some of the states are playing games with the terminology of citizens of the U.S.)...
6) ....and they are letting people elect them without any good faith disclosure in regard to true outcome. Need to say more?
NOTE: It is crime to vote at any election via 2 of the never ratified 14th Amendment.
7) What these people did to several states was a true crime of treason...A political crime:
POLITICAL CRIME: Any crime directly against the government -Black Law Dictionary.
8) POLITICAL CRIME: An offense against the government. Activity in a political uprising without reference to guilt of any specific offense. - Ballentine's Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition.
9) But to ward off these crimes against themselves they had to shift the blame to others...that is, by their consent. To achieve that measure a new conflict was established by operation of law.
10) In regard to these matters, it should be noted that: When the foundation fails, all fails. (Source: Maxims of Law, Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856).
11) Insurgency Summary
The United States is justifying everything that it is doing under the authorization of the United States Constitution. Remember, the 14th Amendment that installs the insurgents states under its Section 3 has a saving clause.
12) READ This thread & learn about the saving clause of Section 3 of the infamous 14th Amendment.
👇
13) Again it sets aside the participants (state officers) from being in insurrection or rebellion; accordingly both States and the United States must uphold the true constitutional premise of the governmental system in this Quiet War.
14) The relative clause that is found in the original Constitution that mandates these insurgents, and the federal corporation, to honor the original premise is set forth by the following:
• Article IV - Section 4. The United States shall guarantee...
15) ...to every state in this Union a Republican form of Government.(NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY)
As established in this part, the current state governments are not republican, they have been USURPED by the 14th Amendment...
16) ....and Amendments that follow it; moreover they are not following the common law. As the current insurgent de facto governments cannot be involved in insurrection, which would include being party to installing a de facto state government that will not uphold the law....
17) ....of the republic of which it exists; it must uphold the Constitution in its entirely. This is evident by the law Congress passes, because it does appear to act in conformity with the Constitution, with the exception of the private law that pertains...
18) ...to United States citizens. Footnote: See the Neutrality Act of 1939, chiefly the Preamble.
Again, nothing in the original Constitution has been repealed; although some insurgent say the overwritten segments are obsolete (Okay, whatever they say), the United States....
19) ...must guarantee the de jure law forms. The proper republican forms of government are defined in the Federalist Papers as written and defined by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. Since the current system is not based on the American states being under...
20) ...such premise, it is safe to say that such "states" cannot and are not able to enjoy a Republican Form of Government.
As you should understand by now you are living to a Republican Form of Government under control of the Senate.
21) NOTE: One must understand that the American Republican form of government different from the Romans. We have representatives which speak for the people. The Roman Senate was more of a dictatorial faction that represented Rome (the State).
22) Our dual system of representation, representatives who represent the people and the Senate who represents the State, is (was) a firewall that protects us against government; however, in its current bastardized form it functions improperly.
23) READ this thread a breakdown of Proper Election of Representation.
👇
24) The people who do not rebel against their law form of right - that would include being able to enjoy a republican form of government and common law inherent in that political form - are entitled to live under it. Even federal based common law is...
25) ....preserved in special cases. Footnote: Special common law remedies may be accessed via the federal court system by Title 28 United States Code § 1333. Moreover, please note that the federal territories (or jurisdiction) are defined by Title 18 United States Code § 7.
26) This defines the new or special jurisdictions of the United States, e.g., where in some instances the FBI has authority to go into a state.
27) There is no doubt that the orchestrated wars are evil. such fact notwithstanding. In summary of these rebellions by the subjects against their de jure states.
28) F.R. Kennedy states it best:
"There can be no really pervasive system of oppression without the CONSENT of the oppressed. Footnote: American Heritage Dictionary, 1998.
29) INSURGENT GOVERNMENTS defined by the United States Supreme Court,-Source: the case Thorington v Smith, 75 U.S. 1, 19 L. Ed. 361, 8 Wall. 1, (1868) U.S. LEXIS 1076, the definition found in Black's Law Dictionary (now removed) the legal description that is attached....
30) ...to the insurgent government system under the 14th Amendment.
is as follows:
Government De Facto: A government of fact (Source: Government "of fact" not "in fact" Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe)
31) 1. A government actually exercising power and control, as opposed to the true and lawful government; a government not established according to the Constitution of the nation, or not lawfully entitled to recognition or Supremacy, but which has nevertheless SUPPLANTED...
32) ....OR DISPLACED the government de jure.
2. A government deemed unlawful, or deemed wrongful or unjust, which, nevertheless receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of the community.
33) 3. There are several degrees of what is called " de facto government". Such a government, in its highest degree, assumes a character very closely resembling that of a lawful government...
34) • this is when the USURPING government expels the regular authorities from their customary seals & functions, and establishes itself in their place, and so becomes the actual government of a country.
35) • the distinguishing characteristic of such a government is that adherents; and, under certain limitations, obligation assumed by it in behalf of the country or otherwise will, in general be respected by the government de jure when restored.
36) 4. Such a government might be more aptly denominated a "government of PARAMOUNT FORCE", being maintained by active MILITARY POWER against the rightful authority of an established and lawful government; and obeyed in civil matters by private Citizens.
37) 5. They are usually administered directly by MILITARY AUTHORITY, but they may be administered, also, by civil authority, supported more less by military force.
The above is not just a general definition. In its dictum, the court actually described the current...
38) ...Insurgent governmental system. It is recommended that you study the content of its dissertation and compare it what will be put forth in explanatory evidence in this treatise. Particulars of law will be set forth that supports that the 14th Amendment actually...
39) ... creates quiet Wars within the several republics of America: which makes people act in treason to their countries (Section 2 of the 14th Amendment "THE RIGHT TO VOTE AT ANY ELECTION, for the choice of electors for PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE "UNITED STATES...
40) ...(de facto and/or emergency federal government), REPRESENTATIVES [in] CONGRESS (De facto/emergency federal government)(Note: Federal Senators are now voted in/for by the rebels of the 14th Amendment States via 17th Amendment), THE EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS...
41) ...(De facto) OF A STATE(a Federal Colony), or THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE (De facto) THEREOF, (Thereof means - the new State) IS DENIED EXCEPT FOR PARTICIPATION IN REBELLION OR OTHER CRIME...."
42) To have an understanding about the constitutional government, again you should reference the section on the CONSTITUTIONAL UNION. For your integral understanding, it is recommended that you read the Federalist Papers. This will allot you additional understanding of...
43) ...the constitutional governments system. Our de jure system is NOT a so-called Democracy; such imputes a system of Insurgents placed unwittingly by peoples of the American republics in the Union.
44) Foreign Governments
Because constitutional law is followed under this insurgent system, the 14th Amendment States are interestingly defined by Congress in the United States Criminal Code:
Title 18 USC § 11. The term "foreign government", as used in this title, including...
45) ....any government, faction, or body of Insurgents within a country with which the United States is at peace, irrespective of recognition by The United States. (FOOTNOTE: if you would look at the complete statute you will find that there are other statutes that...
46) .... preclude people such as foreign diplomats from countries foreign to the United States. This indicates that the statute is in reference to the American states. Moreover, why the United States define foreign governments in the U.S. Code; especially in a criminal code...
47) ...that has do with matters within ITS jurisdiction? They would not: it means the state governments. Also, you may want to review "Military Jurisdiction" and Title 18 § 7 - Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States defined. "SPECIAL POSITIONS"...
48) ... DEFERENT FROM NORMAL)
Was there a treaty between the North and South after the so-called Civil War? It is believed not: just General Grant (FOOTNOTE: GRANT, ULYESSES SIMPSON, Originally Hiram Ulysses Grant, 1822-1885.The 18th President of the United States (1869-1877)..
49) ...and a Civil War general. After his victorious Vicksburg campaign (1862-1863), he was made commander in chief of the Union Army (1864) and accepted the surrender of General Robert E. Lee at Appomattox (1865)....
50) ...Grant's two-term presidency was married by widespread graft and corruption. American Heritage Dictionary. [Grant's two-term presidency was married by widespread graft and corruption, do you think that the Civil War and it's purpose echoed the same? Grant: One of...
51) ...of America's 1st Communist?]) declaring peace after the unsaid conquest the of the South.
So, is the state governments be considered foreign to the United States government? Well, that is what Congress established that they are, see Title 22 USC § 2659
(FOOTNOTE:...
52) ... Again, this is in the Title called "Foreign Relations. It reads "The Secretary of the State shall procure from time to time such of the statutes of the several States as may not be in his office.") Has there been sufficient evidence provided to show that there...
53) ....are insurgents in the American republics? Perhaps answer that one yourself. With that established, fundamentally Section 11 noted above is saying:
1. The state governments are not PERMANENT and they are NOT recognized as being such by the United States. (FOOTNOTE:...
54) RECOGNITION. Official acceptance of the national status of a new government by another nation - American Heritage Dictionary. [ in other words: The United States has not given the state governments recognition ] )
2. The American states are at peace with the United States...
55) ...under the so-called emergency: ERGO, NOT PERMANENT.
3. However, under the law they are insurgents, because:
• The natural Law of Nations is not followed. One reason is: The States are seated by federal citizens, NOT the lawful sovereign body politic of the country;...
56) ...hence under international law these officers are considered INSURGENTS. However, they are not involved in the inflicted insurrections. Their purpose is that of Martial Rule - to keep the peace of the conquest/insurgency.
57) READ this thread & learn more about the sovereign body politic of a country?
58) Again, the 14th Amendment is an emergency measure; (FOOTNOTE: NATIONAL EMERGENCY. A state of national" crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary" and state of war." -Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition) but under the Law of Nations it makes the rebelling..
59) ... citizens of such states Enemies of State. The dual citizenship allows the federal corporation to impose penal law on its Citizens. Yes, there is no doubt the Americans have been set up; but in ignorance they have submitted to this evil fraud by their tacit consent:...
60) ...de facto benefit contracts. In other words: An American national is looking like a duck)
Of course no insurgent citizen can lawfully contest this Quiet War. Again, the internal wars that are domestic to an American republic are governed by the following authorities:...
61) 1. Article IV - Section 4. The United States shall protect each of them [ i.e., the several States }, on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (When the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
2. Article I - Section 8. The Congress...
62) ...shall have Power to provide for calling forth the Militia to suppress insurrections.
3. Article I - Section 8. The Congress shall have Power to define and punish Offences against the Law of Nations.
This Jurist did not say what they are doing is fair ..it is just...
63) ...what they are doing. The best thing you can do is call them on the SCAM and correct your nationality. This will afford you from being punished by the Military style governments for actions done in violation of the Law of Nations.
64) READ this thread & learn the structure of a republican form of government.
1) The Voter is not likely to read why things run backwards. They'll just commit the crime of Treason and move on. Next.
👇
2) To remove superfluous verbiage of section 2 of the 14th Amendment we get "...the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or....
3) ....the members of the Legislature thereof...is DENIED....EXCEPT for participation in REBELLION or other CRIME...."
By voting as a United States citizen — or citizen of the United States — YOU JOIN in the rebellion[s] noted in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment.
@BigLeeBronzer@WeThePeopleElec@Zeppy32815542@deannamcraig The 2nd Amendment is a law for the Federal Officers to follow & keep in mind U.S. Citizens are subject to the jurisdiction thereof via section 1 of the 14th A and belligerents in rebellion via section 2 of the 14th A.
@BigLeeBronzer@WeThePeopleElec@Zeppy32815542@deannamcraig Inhabitants/freemen of the independent sovereign nations (states) are under common law & natural rights to defend is from our creator vs. U S. Citizens are under man's law statutes & codes, corporate policy.
@BigLeeBronzer@WeThePeopleElec@Zeppy32815542@deannamcraig It is important to know what Jurisdiction your under & what type of system we're dealing with. We're not taught to read our own constitutional laws by design. I suggest you read your original state constitution before 1860.
1) I've had some people come off being defensive towards me and say I'm smarter than them or they think I know everything. This is issue with some people, they allow their tiny ego to say stupid shit instead of asking questions after I post. #thursdaymorning
2) I rarely talk about my personal life on social media, but I will share this. I was brainwashed like most people....In my experience in the Communist public school system I was placed in special ed because I was too slow to pick up some of the Marxist programs.
3) I hated "social studies", never read the state constitution and the U.S.. Constitution. Art and gym was my favorite classes. I didn't go to a typical socialist university instead I attended a trade school. Years later in 2016 when I first learn what... #thursdayvibes
1) When the scamdemic started last year that should've woken up around 80% of the population. The easy give away when you have a President regardless of who he is rolled out the federal guidelines to impede our basic freedoms, dictate small businesses being essential or not...
2) ...while major corporate stores remain open. This was a test for men and women to surround every state house & hang these imposters for treason! The type of outrage from men and women that the media will not televised...that is the real shit! #thursdaymorning
3) I am not talking about the paid rioters from BLM/Antifa cowards that attack small business owners. What blows my mind most people went out and voted to maintain the SAME system that's behind the scamdemic along with WHO & other parties. #thursdaymorning
1) Sadly men & women supporting Dems, GOP, Green Party, Libertarian party & other political parties all share the same Party....that is Totalitarian Party!
Totalitarian party United States Code, Title 8 § 1101 (37) (a)(b).
2) ....(37) The term "totalitarian party" means an organization which advocates 👉the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian #dictatorship or totalitarianism👈. #wednesdaythought
3) The terms "totalitarian dictatorship" and 👉"totalitarianism" mean and refer to systems of government 👈 not representative in fact, characterized by (A) 👉the existence of a SINGLE POLITICAL PARTY,👈 organized on a dictatorial basis, with so close an identity between...
1) The usurpers from the oval office all the way down to local level are working 24/7 to oppress us, distract & divide us. I don't care who you are, if you are locked in the political dog & pony show they got you psychologically. #tuesdayvibe
2) This is NOT our government in the first place & the evidence is there in the Texas Supreme Court & the U.S. Supreme Court. ALL the political parties are acting as one by their OWN ADMISSION in the federal statute! #tuesdayvibe
3) Reading the tweet feeds It is obvious so many are duped and still believe this system has our best interest at heart. We are programmed to accept that one fake political party is corrupt with a few agencies like the CIA and FBI in order to keep voting... #tuesdayvibe