Share this page!

issie lapowsky Profile picture
Twitter logo
13 Jul, 4 tweets, 2 min read
NEW: A deep dive into the privacy war raging within the World Wide Web Consortium, where some of the most secretive companies in the world are wrangling over the future of your data — and their own power — in plain sight. #longread

protocol.com/policy/w3c-pri…
As companies like Apple and Google have announced plans to kill off web tracking techniques, the W3C saw an influx of new members from the ad and data industry, who argue these changes are just power grabs by tech giants that are already too powerful protocol.com/policy/w3c-pri…
But longtime members of the W3C say these new entrants are just concern trolling, using fears about Big Tech's power to derail the development of new privacy standards. And, they fear, these tactics are working. protocol.com/policy/w3c-pri…
This is the geekiest story I've ever written, but I found it so fascinating.

The W3C is a microcosm of all of the global policy debates around privacy and competition we see playing out right now, but it's engineers, not politicians, doing the talking. protocol.com/policy/w3c-pri…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with issie lapowsky

issie lapowsky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @issielapowsky

issie lapowsky Profile picture
6 May
Holy Moly. NY AG report finds out of the 22 million net neutrality comments the FCC received in 2017, 18 million were fake.

Report alleges a "secret campaign" by the broadband industry, which offered consumers rewards for male enhancement drugs ‼️

protocol.com/fcc-net-neutra…
It also finds that one single 19-year-old college student submitted more than 7 million pro-net neutrality comments under different fake identities. Wild. protocol.com/fcc-net-neutra…
Every line of this is more flabbergasting than the last: One of the lead generators working with the broadband industry used info obtained from a data breach to submit comments in unwitting consumers' names. protocol.com/fcc-net-neutra…
Read 4 tweets
issie lapowsky Profile picture
5 May
This will get overlooked, but Michael McConnell of the Oversight Board is making a point that's much broader than Trump and gets into concerns about Facebook jail: "Users and their audiences, must not be left in a state of uncertainty as to time or reasons for restoration."
"In the future, if a head of state of government, or high government official repeatedly post messages that pose a risk of harm, Facebook should either suspend the account for definitive period of time, or delete the account." - @HelleThorning_S of the Oversight Board
"Anyone who's concerned about Facebook's excessive concentration of power should welcome the oversight board clearly telling Facebook that they cannot invent new unwritten rules when it suits them." -@HelleThorning_S arguing this is what the board is for. Not sure ppl will agree!
Read 5 tweets
issie lapowsky Profile picture
27 Apr
Sen. Coons begins hearing on algorithms by saying he and Sasse don't have a specific legislative agenda: "Ranking member Sasse and I plan to use this hearing as an opportunity to learn."
Sasse also strikes a conciliatory tone. "It's too easy in DC for us to take any complicated issue and reduce it immediately to heroes and villains and whatever the regulatory or legislative pre-determined tool was to then slam it down on the newly to be defined problem."
Seems clear Coons and Sasse are trying to position this as the "serious" hearing, discouraging the usual partisan finger-pointing.

People, we're potentially looking at two legit and informative tech hearings in a row. Could it be? Reserving judgment.
Read 32 tweets
issie lapowsky Profile picture
19 Mar
I'm creating a new thread to talk about this issue, because I think it's an important one.

Facebook told me multiple times that Ad Observer collects and publishes data on users who hadn't consented.

It was such a damning allegation, I wanted to know whose data they meant. 1/x
I pushed until they confirmed they were talking about advertisers' public Pages, not private users' accounts.

Had I published their statement outright, it would have been misleading or at least incomplete and damaging to the NYU researchers. protocol.com/nyu-facebook-r…
It reminded me of how much tech cos control the narrative around researchers intent.

The most glaring example of this was the vilification of the Cambridge Psychometrics Centre after the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which I covered for WIRED here: wired.com/story/the-man-…
Read 4 tweets
issie lapowsky Profile picture
19 Mar
NEW: Facebook’s attempt to shutter research at NYU on political ads is just the most extreme example of the increasingly fraught relationship between platforms and academics.

My #longreads on how tech giants both court and crush the people who study them protocol.com/nyu-facebook-r…
I talked to @LauraEdelson2 of NYU about her legal issues with Facebook, @mark_ledwich about how the NYU case has put a chill on funding into YouTube transparency projects, @gchaslot about scraping YouTube data and @j_a_tucker about collaborating w/Facebook protocol.com/nyu-facebook-r…
While reporting, Facebook told me Ad Observer violates their terms by scraping/publishing users' data who didn't consent.

That claim shocked me until I realized: the users Facebook was talking about were advertisers whose ads and Pages are already public protocol.com/nyu-facebook-r…
Read 5 tweets
issie lapowsky Profile picture
17 Nov 20
If Senators actually do their jobs during this hearing, we could get answers to critical questions about the efficacy of Facebook and Twitters' election defenses.

But I don't have high hopes. protocol.com/post-election-…
And we're off. In opening remarks, Graham asks: "If you're not a newspaper at Twitter or Facebook, then why do you have editorial control over the New York Post?"

Note: Not republishing something from the NY Post is not the same as having editorial control over the NY Post.
Some rational thinking from Graham: "I don't want the government to take over the job of telling America what tweets are legitimate and what are not."
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @issielapowsky has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @issielapowsky!

Read all threads by @issielapowsky

:(