would read: a comparative study on the quantity and engagement levels of posts on different social media platforms whose main premise is that the social media platform in question is bad
like, do people love tiktoking(?) that tiktok is awful as much as they do tweeting that twitter is awful
tiktalking?
see also: people having IRL conversations about how socializing is painful
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given the partisan split here, it'd be really interesting to see (in a dream world of endless questionnaire space) something along the lines of "And about what share of other people in the [Democratic/Republican] Party do you think support the death penalty?"
(The hypothesis here being that, if it's a social desirability thing rather some other mode difference -- or sampling -- pro-death penalty Dems might be more reticent to express that view if they think they're in the minority within their own party.)
Here's a first look at the preliminary research into the 2020 general election polling error.
So far, it's most definitive in ruling out potential causes -- e.g. education weighting, late vote shift -- that *don't* seem to have been major factors.
This is no surprise if you've been following discussions, but focus is coalescing around some form of differential non-response - that is, people who were polled are different from people who weren't, in a way current weighting didn't account for.
For instance, even if a poll included the correct number of Republicans compared to the actual electorate, Republicans in the poll might have been less supportive of Trump than Republicans who weren't reached.