Garrett Johnson Profile picture
Jul 13, 2021 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Thread explaining FLEDGE (formerly TURTLEDOVE).
Online advertising generates value for publishers, advertisers, & users. Now, Google & others are proposing alternatives that preserve this value while better protecting user privacy under the "Privacy Sandbox" proposals. 1/12
The public discussion of #PrivacySandbox is dominated by #FLoC, but many tech solutions are required to satisfy advertising use cases while protecting privacy. In particular, #FLEDGE propose more fundamental & interesting changes to the status quo. 2/
The key to FLEDGE is to move user targeting information onto the *browser*, rather than broadcasting a cookie ID to the adtech ecosystem so advertisers can bid on ad opportunities based on what they know about that cookie ID. The prototypical FLEDGE use-case is retargeting. 3/
Example: When a user visits Macy's site, Macy’s can add that user to an *interest group* (IG) on the browser. Macy’s can then (re)target users who visited its site: the set of users with Macy’s IG in their browser. The IG also specifies the ads Macy’s wants to show the user. 4/
Any site could set up an interest group. Consider a mattress review site: It could create an interest group and sell the opportunity for mattress manufacturers to show ads to users who are in the market for a mattress. This is affiliate marketing. 5/
To preserve user privacy while allowing targeted ads, the user’s browser runs an on-device ad auction. As inputs, the browser knows the set of eligible advertisers from the user’s interest group membership as well as info like the user’s ad frequency count. 6/
Where does the seller (the publisher) fit? The seller specifies the auction rules and lists eligible advertisers, which tells the browser how to choose a winning ad. This has the knock-on benefit of potentially codifying what can otherwise be an opaque process. 7/
Where does the buyer (advertiser) fit? The buyer already specified its bidding strategy and ad creatives in the interest group. 8/
But campaigns change, so how can buyers prevent zombie🧟 interest group ad campaigns from emptying their wallets? The buyer loads real-time elements of its bidding strategy onto a (trusted) server, which in turn tells the on-device auction how to bid (or stop bidding!). 9/
The on-device auction then has all it needs to:
1) select a well-targeted ad based on the user’s browsing
2) allow sellers to optimize revenue
3) allow buyers to bid intelligently.
Voilà, a new ad is born on the user’s device (not an external ad exchange)! 10/
Why so convoluted? FLEDGE does not want the publisher or advertiser to know the ad chosen by the browser (!!), because this reveals the user’s cross-site behaviour: e.g the user visited Macy’s then the publisher's site. 11/
To do so, FLEDGE proposes to eventually render the ad within a data firewall called a “fenced frame.” In the interim, FLEDGE allows ad-level reporting, but this will eventually be rolled up so that buyer/seller see total ad spend/revenue but not who sees what ad.
END/ 🐦🦆🦢🦜🏸

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garrett Johnson

Garrett Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garjoh_canuck

Jun 4
🇮🇹Journeyed to Milan for a marketing conference hosted by @Unibocconi 🇮🇹
A 🧵… Image
First up, Sonja Gensler documents welfare harms of German regulations capping days for AirBnB hosts. This restricts supply, but the good news 😂 is that non-compliance blunts the welfare harm. Marginal effect on long-term rental prices: the intended benefit of the policy…
Image
Image
@michielvancromb introduces a new research agenda on the “Spotify-ification” of the video game industry: consumers increasingly subscribe to a bundle of games, with profound consequences for the market. (And 3 papers!!!)
Image
Image
Read 21 tweets
Dec 21, 2023
🚨Working paper update!🚨

What is the impact of strict #privacy regulation on content supply and demand?

In Sept 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (#COPPA). We use this to study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff. 1/11 Image
Beginning Jan 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting.
This matches FTC's proposed rules to strengthen COPPA announced yesterday: 2/ bit.ly/3RMARdf
Image
YouTube creators worried these changes amounted to the "COPPAcalypse."
We study 5,066 top U.S. YouTube channels by comparing child-directed content creators to their non-child-directed counterparts using a difference-in-differences design. 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
🚨New working paper!🚨

We study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff using the 2019 YouTube COPPA settlement.

"COPPAcalypse? The YouTube settlement’s impact on kids content” w/ @TesaryLin, James Cooper, & Liang Zhong
➡️ ssrn.com/abstract=44303… 1/9 Image
Data sharing increases ad revenue, which pays for free content, & helps personalize websites to better find the content we want. On the other hand, people want more privacy online: especially for kids.
The YouTube settlement shows the consequences of strict privacy regulation. 2/ Image
In Sept. 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (COPPA). Beginning Jan. 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 9, 2023
🧵What have economists learned from the #GDPR?
I review the literature for a future NBER book on the "Economics of #Privacy" edited by @ce_tucker & @avicgoldfarb. 1/7
nber.org/books-and-chap…
Regulators & researchers seek to balance privacy & the data economy. The EU’s #GDPR is a landmark & influential regulation that defines personal data expansively. GDPR establishes:
-rules for data processing,
-rights for EU residents,
-responsibilities for firms, &
-BIG fines. 2/
#GDPR is hard to study:
A) Finding a suitable control group is hard because the GDPR had global spillovers. E.g., it affects EU firms & non-EU firms serving EU residents.
B) GDPR can screw with personal data: e.g., you may only see data from consenting users. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 26, 2022
🧵Explainer for the Topics API 🧵
Google announced the Topics API for Privacy Sandbox🏖️. Topics is basically FLoC v2.0. Google is deftly replacing FLoC v1 with a more anodyne technology and name...
Details: developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-s…
1/8
Topics allows for interest-based ads without 3rd party cookies. Most research, including our own, shows ad prices are 2-3X higher with cookies.
Put concretely: Interest-based ads help fund content that is socially valuable, but uninteresting to advertisers. 2/ Image
In Topics, the browser classifies begins by classifying the sites that users visit into topics from a list of ~350 readable & benign topics like cats🐈 or hockey🏒.
To do so, sites must opt in and users can opt out. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
May 26, 2021
Happy 3rd birthday🎂 of the #GDPR🇪🇺!

🧵We recently released a big update to our working paper examining how the #GDPR affected the site traffic💻 & ecommerce revenue💶 of EU users. (w/ @samgarvingold & Scott Shriver) 1/11 ssrn.com/abstract=34217… (image: Digiday) Image
We partnered with @Adobe to study the GDPR’s impact on EU users across 1,084 firm site analytics dashboards. Our data contain 77 of the top 1K sites & >700 long tail sites below the top 100K. We see >$0.75 billion in EU spending and 4.4 billion EU pageviews in total per week. 2/ Image
We observe rich site outcomes in Adobe data. But, after the GDPR, we stop observing data from non-consenting users. If recorded site traffic falls post-GDPR, we want to know:
A) how much did GDPR hurt real outcomes of websites?
B) how much did consent limit data recording? 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(