Guess I should get this tweet thread started, eh? It's Tuesday night, so that means #Boulder city council. Our first meeting after summer vacation!

On tap:
Public hearing/council feedback on (partial) redevelopment of Diagonal Plaza
Community Benefit 2.0
Council work check-in
TOTALLY forgot, but this was supposed to be council's triumphant return to chambers, with some staff and public at home. But technical issues scuttled the hybrid meeting so... we're still fully remote. Trying again next week.
Mayor Weaver announcing the public input period for the "reimagining" of Boulder's police dept, going on now through July 31. Link: beheardboulder.org/reimagine-poli…
There's other stuff at BeHeardBoulder.org, too (Alpine-Balsam, parks & rec, pollinators, etc.) The mayor usually doesn't announce those surveys, but I guess the police one is important.
Not gonna thread this, exactly, but council is making some changes to its procedures. Kinda boring stuff, tbh. You can read about it here: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/Electr…
The most significant is when council can "revisit" a topic they've already decided on. Many issues have brought this up, but most recently homelessness. Those in the minority felt that spending $3M on enforcement was a "material change" that warranted a new discussion.
This matters bc a topic can't be revisited without a material change.

There was no official definition for what a material change is (minority argued that city money should count) but there is now. IMO, it's kinda worse than not having a definition at all.
Now a "material change" is defined as something that, "having occurred before the prior council meeting, would have made it unlikely a majority would have supported the prior decision.
Nothing about city spending, or changes in law or fact.. just... if the majority wouldn't change its mind no matter what's happened, the matter is decided.
Which I guess makes *some* sense, but even if the vote is unlikely to change, if FACTS have, elected officials should at least have to make the same vote in light of new facts, and do so in the public eye. In my opinion.
Brockett also having issues with the new definition of "material change."

"That seems like something that's unknowable," he says, how a past council would have behaved
He's suggesting more specific language: A change in fact or law that is significant enough to make one or more council members change their vote.
Friend also concerned about the material change definition. She likes Brockett's suggestion. But agrees its "unknowable" how council members would have voted.
Also doesn't like the suggestion that a revisited topic can ONLY be discussed for 15 min. "That just seems a little strict," Friend says.
Wallach on board with both Friend and Brockett's suggestions.
Guess I am going to thread this after all.
Young wants to tweak Brockett's language. "Significant to whom?" she says. That's "a subjective term; we need to define it."

A "super-majority of council" should decide if a material change has occurred, Young says.
Weaver: Why a super majority and not just a majority?
Young: Bc we'd be re-litigating.
Yates: Prefers Brockett's language, and suggests not putting a specific time limit but instead letting the council scheduling committee to decide time. Revisits of topics should be "brief," he says.
Lots of discussion over when public hearings can be held. That is, which portion of the meeting (which defines how much public notice there is).
And then some convo over what constitutes "disruptive" behavior that the mayor can interrupt and try to stop. I don't think cursing counts, but that's kinda what prompted this whole thing: Bad language and insults of staff.
We're back to talking about public hearings again. Ah, the tedious nature of city government. I love it.
Still at it.
STILL haggling over language.
Weaver: "I figured there would be some discussion on this one; I just underestimated it."

We've finally moved on.
I'm just realizing that Junie Joseph is not here tonight.
@threadreaderapp please unroll. Thank you!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shay Castle

Shay Castle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shayshinecastle

14 Jul
Lastly: Checking in on what this council has accomplished. Surprisingly, a lot (compared to the last council, at least, and in the context of a pandemic and a mass shooting)

Presentation here: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/DocVie…
This council started out with 12 priorities. COVID made 13.
7 have been completed; 3 more will be by the end of the year
Here's what they finished / will finish:
Racial equity - adopted plan
Boulder/Xcel partnership
CMAP - to be adopted August 2021
COVID - repeal of emergency declaration anticipated fall 2021
Financial strategy subcommittee launched
Read 31 tweets
14 Jul
Next: Community Benefit 2.0
Presentation: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/Electr…
Some background: This project is tied to height limits. The citywide height limit (approved by voters) is 55 ft. But most areas of the city have a lower height limit by-right: That is, you can build to THAT without a special process.
In the past, the only way to go above the zoned height limit (but still under 55 feet!) was kinda on a case-by-case basis, through site review.

Around 2015, there were a lot of 55 ft buildings going up, and council was like *clutches pearls*
Read 55 tweets
14 Jul
Moving on to Diagonal Plaza. You can read about this here: boulderbeat.news/2021/06/24/dia…
Or follow along with the city's presentation: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/DocVie…
This is just the concept plan stage, so council is deciding on anything. They're just providing feedback on the design and other aspects of the plan.
Read 99 tweets
13 Jul
Finished watching the incredibly depressing documentary about The Villages, a large retirement community in Florida.

One tiny little detail has stuck with me: A sermon in which a preacher says that worrying means you don't have enough faith in God.
I used to hear this shit all the time growing up in the church. Normal human experiences (fear, doubt, sadness, not to mention actual health conditions like anxiety or depression) were all attributed to a lack of faith.
Rhetoric like this serves to make people ashamed of normal human emotions and experiences, who then try to divorce themselves from their feelings.

It also separates people from control of/responsibility for their emotions and experiences. Got a problem? Give it to Jesus.
Read 4 tweets
23 Jun
Next: Parking. We're focusing on two areas right now - pricing and neighborhood parking permits.

Staff presentation: www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/AMPS_Impl…
Basically, parking isn't paying for itself (at least not the neighborhood permits), so the city is recommending higher prices to achieve cost recovery in 5 years.
We'll talk Neighborhood Parking Permits first. My notes:
Resident passes will go from $17 to $30 annually in 2022 and increase by $10 every year thereafter until “cost recovery is achieved”
Read 151 tweets
23 Jun
The first part of this crime update is actually about Boulder's changing policing strategy. Crime data is at the end. Presentation: www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/PD_Strate…
Boulder is currently "reimagining" the police dept. You can weigh in on that here: beheardboulder.org/reimagine-poli…
And read some more here: boulderbeat.news/2021/02/08/bou…
Read 69 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(