Thread by @APhilosophae

Looks like Batch 147 was photocopied from Batch 139.

Ballot images are available here:
ballots.youpeople.org/wide.cgi

And here (hi res permanent download):
…antajournalconstitution.sharefile.com/share/view/s3c…

Easy comparison site here (use fuzz 1 and light colors or it can obfuscate characters):
online-image-comparison.com

There are two almost identical batches, all from Tabulator 5162.

147 and 139,
and
235 and 234.

This is confirmed by comparing the result hash codes. There are only 3 result codes found in either 235 or 234 that is not present in the other batch in the same numbers.
Comparing the actual ballots is harder because of the low resolution and the sometimes
perfectly filled dots.

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1415025025510526977?s=20

Tabulator05162\Batch235\Images\05162_00235_000068.tif

Tabulator05162\Batch234\Images\05162_00234_000009.tif

This pair has a write in, making it obvious.

Tabulator05162\Batch235\Images\05162_00235_000084.tif

Tabulator05162\Batch234\Images\05162_00234_000025.tif

At least 2 batches that are duplicate votes but scanned in reverse and a lot of what looks like duplicate ballot scanned multiple times.

The traditional auditing & recount procedures have absolutely no way to detect if people are scanning votes multiple times, or to even detect if piles of ballots are just being dropped off by fraudsters and scanned.

The system is set up such that anybody who wanted to do this could easily do it as long as they weren't manipulating the voting machine to count differently it would probably never be detected unless by full forensic audit.

They never expected a full forensic audit. Theyve been caught!

But, this is the sad truth of the matter right here. 👇

A bunch of random people can figure this crap out given just a few days of looking at stuff from a single county. It's not really hidden. It just requires access, time, and a bit of willingness.

You think our State & Federal agencies don't know this?
They know this and they're likely complicit. Even if they are not complicit, they will never let anybody know that they knew esp. if they are forced to make an arrest, which is unlikely.

They know that if the public were to find out the voting system was full of holes, easily manipulated AND really was rigged and there was evidence of fraud, this entire country may plunge into chaos.

Look at what happened last year with Floyd. Look at what that caused.

Now imagine if you had half the country under the belief that they had been disenfranchised by mass vote fraud.
And the other half of the country believing that it's all white supremacy and Nazi crazies.

It would have been total Chaos.

Don't forget, in Maricopa county, Arizona those databases were deleted. "I discovered a [Master File Table] that clearly indicated that the database directory was deleted from that server." This was Ben Cotton, founder of CyFir.

The media downplayed this bc he said the action of deleting was moot bc he recovered them. That led the media on a tirade about how they werent really deleted then and how he then lacked consistency. They purposefully obfuscated what he said as cover.

Anyone can go online and look at the documentation for rstudio which states that the Red x designates recovered files which were intentionally deleted. The screenshot Cotton provided denoted the database with a Red x, meaning they had been recovered from an intentional deletion.

This looks to have been their primary method of election fraud on election night. And the method is undeniably clever. Duplicate ballots are difficult to catch and easy to argue there’s no malice behind it.

Take this chart of ballot ID's. It shows how many times each ballot ID was scanned, according to the released GA data set. Ballot ID's which did not exist are not represented in this chart. Ballot IDs are not globally unique, so multiple occurrences of each ID are expected.

The average ballot had a ballot ID that had been seen roughly 225 times.

As the graph shows, certain anomalous ballot ID's are seen at a rate 4-10x the average frequency.

These spikes correlate exactly with how people voted.

So, the more times a ballot ID was seen, the better predictor it became of HOW that vote was cast. This shouldnt happen. The ID on your ballot has ZERO to do with your personal politics. This can be explained however if the same sets of ballots were repeatedly scanned. FRAUD.

*Here it is as a complete graphic. Thank you to its creator!