This whole thing is extremely funny, to me. I was just eating lunch and I saw that Politico tweet about Rodrigo being bad at parallel parking and forever reason this extremely dumb premise (the WH blowing it by not inviting Ariana Grande) just popped into my head.
I chuckled bc it was so stupid. I thought when I posted it some people would get it and others would find it believable (bc Politico publishes gossipy bullshit like that all the time). I thought it'd eventually get back to them & they'd be like, 'Uhhh no. We didnt' write that.'
But I thought it'd be a while and it'd be a pretty mild reaction. Instead, within an hour of posting, big diaper baby/editor of Politico Sam Stein was calling it 'disinformation' and summoning Twitter Support, which...I didn't really expect. I guess I should have, though.
I have tremendous respect for journalists. Most all of them do a great job for not enough pay, in shrinking industry. The exception to this is political journalists. They are mostly thin-skinned, overpaid hacks who miss the forest from the trees & think they're above criticism.
Or in this case, think they're above parody. The fact that ppl would believe that this extremely stupid premise- the WH not getting Ariana Grande was a big failure- really goes to show how low of an opinion ppl have of what Politico publishes. And it's completely warranted...
Tbh, even Sean 'yellow teeth' Davis of The Federalist gave it more than an hour before he freaked out over the 'Mommy Milky' tweet and that went genuinely viral. This had like 40-50 RTs.
When that guy has thicker skin than you...
*for whatever reason. whatever. its late
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DO(ING) SOMETHING is inventing a thing that you think might/might not happen and then getting pre-emptively mad at it and declaring the Dems have (already) failed, before it even occurs.
(And then when it occurs afterwards, you can just claim that your advocacy was what did it)
Fyi, I watched the interview with Schiff. All he said was, "We don't even have the committee members set yet. The only thing we have solidified is the first hearing with the front line police. But sure, it's definitely possible we'll be hearing from people like Milley".
Like, what are you even talking about/ getting mad over? The committee hasn't even started yet. How do you know that they're 'uninterested in getting answers'...it literally hasn't happened yet. Premature failure (source: my imagination that Dems will fail to DO SOMETHING!)
That's it. That's definitely the big story here. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who is privvy to Trump's private actions & classified info, he has nowhere near the sensible perspective as some limp-dick who claimed an 80-year old congresswoman brutalized him.
"Hey uhh all the people around Trump thought exactly the same stuff as the shitlibs were saying. Hmmm does that mean that we might have been wrong (for 4 years) and they were right? Nope, it just means everyone *but* me is totally hysterical."
Lying about name-searching, something which he does regularly ("I stopped years ago")....just extremely pathetic and Trumpian. Could make a whole psych study out of this man's brain.
"This is something I did years ago but stopped because it was too time consuming."