Share this page!

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
Twitter logo
15 Jul, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Our enemies want us to believe that the only choice for America is between Trumpist autocracy and Marxist-Leninist - Communism. They want us thinking in a binary manner, driven by emotion, into choosing one or the other. Balkanizing into diametrically opposed camps 1/
with bloodshed not far behind. It is imperative that we continue to keep our eye on the ball using rational thought and logic. Trump has been defeated but not Trumpism. It’s easy for us to fall back into comfortable old habits. Being lazy and politically ambivalent. 2/
That’s the last thing we should do. We can still lose our Republic. If we fail in our vigilance, a smarter Trump or a savvy extremist from the left could still come to power. Same goal, different methods. Social and political upheaval shredding the fabric of America. 3/
Our fight for the Republic continues Patriots, but for the time being, the Republic stands. X

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Andrew C Laufer, Esq

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lauferlaw

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
7 Jun
Thread re: #CryinMo , Service of Process, and Insurance coverage.

We see here Mo cryin’ like a colicky baby. Why is that? The reason is his wife was just served with process - a lawsuit - righteously instituted by @RepSwalwell for #CryinMo ‘s antics inciting an insurrection 1/
on January 6th. Now you may ask, but they didn’t serve him. Don’t they have to do that in order to have “good” or proper service? No. A process server - plaintiff hires a company - can serve a person “of suitable age and discretion.” In this case, it’s #CryinMo ‘s wife. 2/
She’s someone who resides with him, over 18 years of age, and not active duty military - can be called away at a moments notice and unable to inform service target of the lawsuit - so she fits the criteria for someone being of “suitable age and discretion.” Now #CryinMo can 3/
Read 9 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
11 Apr
I watch the entire footage that’s been made public. The officers had probable cause for a traffic stop to check on his temp tags. However, the did not have PC to deploy this type of force against Lt. Nazario, a member of the National Guard. PC to detain and force are two 1/
separate things. LEOs require PC in each instance. There’s a claim by the apprehending officers that there was a 90 second delay between the direction to stop and when Nazario pulled over. Has this been substantiated? And if so, by whom? If true, it still doesn’t justify 2/
the force deployed against him. The officers did not have probable cause to search him or the vehicle. Hence, excessive force. Whoever deployed pepper spray and assaulted Nazario should be fired and charged. If he improperly displayed his temp tags, give him a summons 3/
Read 4 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
30 Mar
I’ve successfully litigated a number of 4th amendment cases where my clients were stopped, frisked, questioned, & arrested when they didn’t have identification on them. What usually happens is they are put through the system and released after 24+ hours w all charges are 1/
dropped. There is no legal requirement to have ID on ones person nor should there be. #COVID19 vaccine info should be kept w ones medical records like MMR & other vaccines are kept. There should also not be a requirement to present photo ID when one votes. Voter fraud is 2/
virtually non-existent and the only examples I can recall are ones committed by Republicans. npr.org/2019/07/30/746… 3/
Read 4 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
29 Mar
America is far from perfect but the great thing about our country is we can always make it a better place. Counties like Russia or China have always remained the same. Power focused within a few select individuals or corrupt group benefiting the few. It’s been that way since 1/
their inception centuries ago. Whether it’s a Tzar, Emperor, or General Secretary, both nations have swung between authoritarianism and totalitarianism. They don’t appreciate what a free and empowered populace can accomplish. They only know manipulation, suppression & 2/
terror. Mass death in the tens of millions have plagued these virtually failed states. From the Cultural Revolution to the Purges of Stalin and the Red Scare, they know nothing but torment and death. They haven’t yet experienced what a free ppl can accomplish if motivated 3/
Read 9 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
30 Nov 20
The pardon isn’t all encompassing and only address crimes linked to the Mueller investigation. Notice how DOJ had to make a motion before the Court again in order to dismiss the prosecution. If Judge Sullivan acknowledges the pardon as valid and not an attempt at
obstruction of justice by POTUS, he will dismiss the case. Flynn will still remain a convicted felon. If he appoints a special counsel - amicus curie - most likely Gleeson again - he’s opening the door to challenge the validity of the pardon based upon corrupt intent, a lawful
act used for an unlawful purpose. What’s interesting is that this pardon is limited and not blanket for all federal crimes committed prior to its issuance. My feeling and hope is that Judge Sullivan will further task Judge Gleeson, ret with investigating the basis and
Read 4 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
25 Nov 20
So it appears Trump may attempt to pardon Flynn. This was expected. No surprise here. We need to take a breath and understand that this will not work out for Trump or Flynn. We have already seen what Judge Sullivan has done when Barr attempted to dismiss Flynn’s prosecution 1/
The Court said “hold on” and appointed special counsel to investigate it - Judge Gleeson, ret. - and refused to do so. This then went to the DC circuit and ultimately Judge Sullivan’s rulings not to dismiss Flynn’s prosecution was ultimately upheld. 2/
I have the same inclination I had before that Judge Sullivan will take a similar stance to appoint special counsel - Gleeson most likely will continue - to review and probably challenged the legality of the pardon. We have also seen the beginnings of this before 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @lauferlaw has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @lauferlaw!

Read all threads by @lauferlaw

:(