In 1873, the mathematician Georg Cantor shook math to the core when he discovered that infinity comes in many sizes. Setting out to climb the tower of infinities that he created, a mystery stopped him in his tracks. (Thread)
There exist an infinite amount of “natural” numbers, like 1, 2 and 3, but Cantor proved that there are even more “real” numbers that sit between the natural numbers on the number line — most with never-ending digits, like 3.14159…. In other words, a larger infinity.
The mystery, called the continuum hypothesis, concerns how the size — or “cardinality,” designated with the aleph symbol, ℵ — of these infinities progresses. Cantor theorized that the cardinality of the real numbers is exactly ℵ₁, one level up from the natural numbers.
Georg Cantor was never able to prove his continuum hypothesis. In 1900, David Hilbert put it first on his famous list of 23 math problems to solve in the 20th century. But later, Kurt Gödel and Paul Cohen proved that math’s existing core axioms can neither prove nor disprove it.
Because the continuum hypothesis cannot be proved with the standard axioms, mathematicians have searched for a new axiom that would help settle the question. Two rival options emerged, but their apparent incompatibility led to many dead ends.
A new proof has united these two best candidates for a mathematical axiom that would settle the size of the real numbers. But this unification has not come without controversy. quantamagazine.org/how-many-numbe…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Quanta Magazine

Quanta Magazine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QuantaMagazine

29 Jan
THREAD: The researchers developing epidemiological models are often expected to provide answers where there are none, with a certainty they can’t guarantee. Here is how these models are made, and where their uncertainties lie. (Reporting by @jordanacep)
To understand pandemics and other disease outbreaks, scientists turn to two well-established approaches to quantitative epidemiological modeling. Today’s models usually fall on a spectrum between the two.
On one end of the spectrum are models that split a population into “compartments” based on whether they are susceptible, infected or recovered (S, I or R). Because COVID-19 has such a long incubation period, its models also need to include an exposed (E) compartment.
Read 14 tweets
4 Nov 20
In the 1970s, Steven Hawking proposed that information that falls into a black hole gets destroyed, never to be retrieved. A series of breakthrough papers have now shown that’s not correct. Here’s a thread about the famous black hole information paradox:
According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, the gravity of a black hole is so intense that nothing can escape it. Hawking’s “semiclassical” approach brought together quantum mechanics and relativity and predicted the famous information paradox.
Now, theoretical physicists have demonstrated that additional semiclassical effects emerge in older black holes, allowing information to spill out.
Read 10 tweets
28 Oct 20
Here’s a thread about the fundamental constituents of the universe, as explained by @nattyover, with graphics by Samuel Velasco and @LucyIkkanda.
In the 1970s, physicists formed a framework that encapsulates our best understanding of nature’s fundamental order. Yet most visualizations of the Standard Model of particle physics are too simple, ignore important interconnections or are overwhelming.
The most common visualization of the Standard Model shows a periodic table of particles, but doesn’t offer insight into the relationships between them. It also leaves out key properties like “color.” Image
Read 21 tweets
8 May 20
Time has fascinated the human mind for millennia. Through the vantage points of culture, physics, timekeeping and biology, we have compiled a special timeline organizing some of the efforts that humans have made to understand time. (thread) quantamagazine.org/what-is-time-a…
Western culture tends to emphasize a linear conception of time, but the ancestors of today’s Australian aboriginal peoples embraced a timeless view of nature. In Asia, followers of Hinduism and Buddhism adopted a cyclic view.
Some of the best evidence for how ancient cultures viewed time can be found in artifacts of timekeeping mechanisms, like Egyptian sundials and circular Mayan calendars.
Read 9 tweets
30 Mar 20
The revered condensed matter physicist Philip Anderson passed away yesterday at the age of 97. Here is a sampling of some of Anderson’s ideas that have propelled modern physics. (Thread)
Anderson won the 1977 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of what is now called Anderson localization, a phenomenon in which some waves stay within a given “local” region rather than advancing freely.
Quanta covered new advances in the understanding of Anderson localization in 2017 in an article that later became an episode of the Quanta Science Podcast:
quantamagazine.org/mathematicians…
Read 6 tweets
20 Mar 20
Most of us imagine the universe as extending forever in all directions. Does it have to be so? (Thread)
quantamagazine.org/what-is-the-ge…
After all, because of the planet’s very subtle curvature, everyone once thought that the Earth was flat. Now, of course, we know it’s shaped like a sphere.
Is our contemporary mental model of a vast, infinitely expansive universe similarly flawed?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(