"A Real S*** Show:" Astonishing comments from soldiers angry they aren't being allowed to repair their own equipment because of restrictions from defense contracts. mattstoller.substack.com/p/a-real-s-sho…
"I'm a mechanic in the Army, ran into this problem with AC systems on the Bradley. 120+ degrees sucks for electronic systems, I couldn't tell you how much money was lost buying new parts where it could have been prevented by having the ability to maintain already stalled AC."
"When I was in Iraq, we had a juniper firewall go down, didn't have another on back up, and they had to fly a contractor out from the states to Iraq, to change it out. Took 10 minutes to diagnose the problem, and 3 days of waiting, and 15 minutes to install it...
... We lost feed to the predator drones in the area, phone, internet, coms, and several other mission critical things for 3 days.... a real s*** show."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. I don't think that the Biden WH's call for Facebook to control disinformation is a giant power grab for a simple reason. Grab implies there's a change, but the power already exists and has existed for years. The Trump admin sought to use it too. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
2. What is the actual problem here? We don't have a disinformation or censorship problem related to phone networks or email. Only social networking. Why? Because the FB problem we are dealing with is a business model issue, the financing of monopoly communications system by ads.
3. While a lot of people focus on Jennifer Psaki's comment about taking down anti-vax content from specific users, this commentary by the Surgeon General on the danger of clickbait ad models hit the root problem.
It is a significant error to assume that the U.S. enforcers are converging with the Europeans. @vestager hasn't blocked a merger in two years. Not one. She approved Google-Fitbit.
The EU has gotten headlines, but the bureaucrats there are corporatists.
I've been at conferences with European enforcers, and they are *explicit* in rejecting the Brandeisian view. They are strong proponents of consumer welfare and economist control over policymaking.
It's important to note @vestager is *explicitly* hostile to breaking up big firms. When asked if she agrees with Elizabeth Warren's plan to break up big tech, she said not really and characterized doing so as extreme and a violation of private property rights. Very Bork-ian.
1. Ok, so last week Joe Biden made a speech that is potentially as significant as Reagan's comment that "Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." He said the era of corporate power is over. mattstoller.substack.com/p/biden-launch…
2. "We are now forty years into the experiment of letting giant corporations accumulate more and more power." With an explicit attack on Robert Bork, Biden pronounced this experiment "a failure." whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
3. It's weird for Biden, a 78-year old political lifer from the 'corporate state of Delaware' - as he put it - would break with how the Democrats have been for decades. But Democrats aren't blind, they recognized Trump was a symptom of an angry public. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
“The moratorium on public speaking has thrown a wrench into several upcoming conferences that often feature FTC staff, such as next week’s American Bar Association’s annual consumer protection conference, which takes place every two years.”
Big thumbs up
The FTC in the last 20 years loved putting on roundtables, forums, panels, whatever.
The Federal Trade Commission is now holding forth on a rule to stop fraudulent Made in USA labeling.
Chopra says there has been a longstanding bipartisan consensus not to enforce against fraudulent Made in USA labeling, choosing a "highly permissive Made in USA fraud policy." Commissioners routinely voted to allow wrongdoers to escape penalties.
Judge James Boasberg - an Obama appointee - dismisses the case on market definition quibbling. Boasberg says there are no clear lines on what even constitutes social networking.
Basically the judge concedes Mark Zuckerberg said 'let's do crimes' but because judges now read antitrust law to require super weird expensive fights over market definitions, the case was dismissed. It can be refiled.