Wonderful news out of the @TheJusticeDept today! AG Garland has reversed Matter of Castro-Tum, the decision by former AG Sessions that ended the use of administrative closure in immigration courts. This is a very important return to fairness in immigration courts. My take. /1
Here is the decision for my fellow legal nerds. justice.gov/eoir/page/file… Administrative closure is a long-used tool that allowed immigration judges to close immigration proceedings when agreed by all parties--and when the equities of the case warranted it. /2
Discretion is an essential tool for any fair court system, especially our immigration courts that run on unjust immigration laws in desperate need of updating (Hint, hint Congress). When former AG Sessions ended admin closure over 350K CLOSED immigration cases were reopened. /3
As a result, I represented a DACA recipient whose immigration case was reopened & who was threatened with deportation despite being in valid DACA status. Today's decision ends the constant fear that hundreds of thousands have faced. I am so grateful to see this needed change. /4
We sued w/@HlsImmigration & @gibsondunn
to obtain documents on efforts to put DACA recipients in deportation after Castro Tum. We'll keep fighting to get full records on what happened when this unjust policy was in place! But for today we tell it goodbye! justiceactioncenter.org/justice-action…
@TheJusticeDept Huge gratitude to you, @benwinograd for suing to take down Castro Tum in some of the circuits!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karen Tumlin

Karen Tumlin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KarenTumlin

16 Jul
As expected, Judge Hanen has issued an order that is out of sync with other legal interpretations on #DACA and effectively halts the program for new applicants. A thread on what the order does -- & doesn’t -- mean 1/8
First, the order should underscore for everyone watching that the clock ⏰ is ticking for Congress to act on #immigration. They needed to act 20 years ago, and they REALLY need to act now. But here’s what folks need to know now 2/8
Current DACA recipients are safe for now. While the order vacates the entire program, the Court has said that DHS can continue to process renewals for now. We don’t know how long this will last, so if you’ve been waiting to renew, make sure to do it now. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
24 Jun
Today the Biden administration took another important step to dismantle the cruel Remain in Mexico or MPP program created by Trump. Good on Biden, but we this is merely the 1st mile in a marathon that the administration needs to run to restore humanity to our asylum system. 1/9
Today’s news 📰 will allow folks outside of the U.S. who had their MPP case terminated or who were ordered deported in absentia to register & apply for processing into the U.S. More info here: dhs.gov/migrant-protec… 2/9
So, who could this benefit? Immigrants can be ordered removed “in absentia” when they do not attend their immigration court hearing. And such an order does not say they did not qualify for asylum—just that they didn’t show up to court. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
2 Jun
Here's my take on what today's memo from @AliMayorkas formally ending the MPP program means--and what it still leaves left to be done.

For those wanting to nerd out. Here's the memo: dhs.gov/sites/default/…

1/7
Why did this happen today? Remember that on Feb. 2, 2021 Biden issued an executive order that paused the MPP program and required the Secretary of DHS to promptly review the program & decide whether to formally terminate it. That formal termination came today via this memo. 2/7
But MPP had been paused long before that. MPP court hearings stopped on March 23, 2020 due to the pandemic--leaving many asylum seekers in legal limbo while forced to wait outside the U.S. in unsafe conditions.

So what is new today...?

3/7
Read 7 tweets
28 May
It's been quite the Friday in immigration news 🗞️. Here are my hot takes on the asylum news from today.

Speed & efficiency are great values for vaccine distribution but they are off base for asylum. Here's why: the cost of going too fast = sending people to their deaths. 1/10
The day's 1st announcement was from @TheJusticeDept & @DHSgov creating a rocket docket for families seeking asylum who are exempted from the cruel Title 42 policy that expels most families seeking safety. (They call it a "dedicated docket" but if it walks like a 🦆 ...) 2/10
I'm not against efficient systems if they're fair, but we're light years away from a fair system. Real talk: we do not have a working asylum system for the southern border. We have an expulsion policy-unjustified by public health needs-with a pitiful amount of exceptions. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
14 May
#Breaking: some MORE Friday immigration news. Today, we escalated our effort to make sure the U.S. will #WelcomeWithDignity immigrant kids who were involved with MPP by asking the court to order the Biden admin to give these children their Congressionally mandated rights. 1/10
Remember MPP? It forced 70,000+ people seeking safety in the U.S. to live in squalid, dangerous conditions along the U.S.-Mexico border. The Biden admin has promised to stop MPP & has made progress on that, which we celebrate. But we're a long way from the end of MPP’s ills. 2/10
Under Trump, kids who interacted with MPP & then came across the border w/o parents or caregivers were treated horribly. Our plaintiffs shared heart-wrenching 💔stories about young children being put on planes & dropped off in countries where they had no parents. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
14 May
🎉Victory! @POTUS has reversed the Trump Health Care Insurance Ban. This ban, which has long been enjoined due to our litigation, was a Trump policy designed to separate immigrants from their family members on the basis of wealth, health or status. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/… 1/5
We joined forces with @latnet_PDX @ThinkLawLab @AILANational @SidleyLaw & a set of plaintiffs in Oct. 2019 to fight back against this shameful Ban. Because of these plaintiffs we were able to prevent this disaster of a policy from ever taking effect. When we fight, we win. 2/5
Our legal director, Esther Sung, put it best: “This ban masqueraded as a health issue, but was really only designed to keep immigrants from being able to reunite w/their families in the U.S. This policy undermined our public health system & we’re grateful to our plaintiffs." 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(