Surprisingly, Cosmos is one of the lesser invested smart contract platforms even though Terra, Anchor, and Sifchain are all part of the Cosmos ecosystem.
Funds appear to be moving up the value stack of the Cosmos ecosystem for returns. messari.io/article/cosmos…
Messari Pro comes with access to our full list of community screeners, including VC portfolio screeners for Multicoin, Pantera, Paradigm, ParaFi, Three Arrows Capital, and more: messari.io/article/messar…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This isn't to say that Punks, Meebits, Bored Apes, or other #NFT avatar/collectibles can't be valuable or won't continue to rise in value.
But let's all just be clear on what people are buying – status and to a lesser extent, community.
In regards to "Punks = Store of Value"
To a degree, yes Punks or NFT collectibles can be a greater store of value than their legacy luxury goods counterparts (e.g. handbags and Rolex's deteriorate over time) but the drivers of social status change over time.
Perhaps the most entertaining story on governance this year comes from your neighborhood gas station, Exxon Mobil.
Exxon's story also shares an example of how the value of governance will evolve in crypto.
A Thread on Proxy Wars, Exxon, Crypto, and Governance 👇🏻
Exxon Mobil – one of the largest oil producers in the world with a market capitalization of $270 billion – has recently entered the proxy fight of its life.
Activist fund, Engine No 1 bought 0.02% of Exxon with the intent of pressuring Exxon to adopt a greater ESG focus.
The argument is that Exxon’s unwillingness to divest from oil and gas has resulted in the underperformance of the company which is management’s (the board’s) fault.
Orchid's key piece of infrastructure is nanopayments – probabilistic payments where instead of sending $1, a consumer would send a payment with a provably fair 1% chance of paying $100.
Orchid's infrastructure can be used to create other marketplaces that require nanopayments.
Orchid faces competition from existing VPN providers, but can potentially compete on a few axes:
1) Price - most important for consumers
2) Security - enhanced encrypt, no single server or point of failure
3) Privacy - many VPNs are free but collect your data and sell it
The most valuable assets are intangible. However, this hasn’t always been true.
Before the 1990’s the most valuable assets – as categorized as components of the S&P 500 – were tangible assets(i.e. Land, equipment, etc).
Crypto will increase the value of intangible assets.
This trend might not surprise you, as it might intuitively make sense in the context of everyday life.
Disney+ is valuable because of Marvel and The Mandalorian. People drink Coca-Cola instead of the clearly tastier Pepsi. Users buy Fortnite skins which hold zero in-game value.
Intangible assets, in particular, intellectual property are often described as illiquid and inefficient for a variety of reasons including market opaqueness, inconsistent valuations, and lack of standardization.
Digitizing & programming IP assets can help alleviate these issues.