I've had a lot of people reach out recently and ask what's been driving the #LightningNetwork's latest exponential growth phase.

I think I'd attribute it to four main sources:
🧵👇
1) The combo of @getumbrel, @RaspiBlitz, and @voltage_cloud with the host of node & liquidity management guides produced by @LeoAW and @hmichellerose have made it stupid easy to get a node online and connected.
docs.lightning.engineering
This laid the groundwork for some super vibrant communities of node runners to pop up a la Ring of Fire and Plebnet. These groups are the primordial soup out of which the next wave of LN startups will emerge IMO... lots of tinkering and lots of great memes
2) real sustainable volume growth across the board has lead to large influxes of capital to/from popular nodes as seen by the largest growers over the last 30 days.

@OpenNodeCo, @bitfinex, @acinq_co, @river, and @walletofsatoshi account for ~1/3 of the 300 BTC added in that time
3) the remittance use case has successfully crossed the chasm (h/t @MichaelLevin) thanks to @jackmallers, @ln_strike and El Salvador. Huge amount of new inbound interest in an LN integration from exchanges & wallets with users in remittance-heavy countries
michael-levin.medium.com/part-2-lightni…
Importantly, many users are not willing to wait for their local exchange or mobile wallet to integrate LN, but are downloading @Breez_Tech, @MuunWallet or @bluewalletio to get the benefits of instant low-fee remittances today. @KalKassa has the receipts
4) people are catching on to the fact that LN is more than just a payments network, it's an incentivized private data network where satoshis are just one kind of data. @ImperviousAi gets this, @sphinx_chat gets this, @SatoshisStream and @PodcastindexOrg get this...
Every routing node has four natural resources it can monetize: bitcoin liquidity, storage, bandwidth, and compute. We've already started building a marketplace for allocating liquidity with @LightningPool.

When marketplaces for the other three start showing up, watch out 🤯
These 4 factors combine into a flywheel that's starting to spin:
🔁more users on the network
🔁more volume flowing through it
🔁more fees to capture
🔁more people running nodes
🔁more devs tinkering
🔁more users on the network

Aren't network effects a beautiful thing @starkness?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Gentry

Ryan Gentry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RyanTheGentry

14 May
Recently, I've been thinking about this chart from @hasufl and @nic__carter concerning the changing #bitcoin narrative. I think the recent focus on NgU has been misguided, and we've lost sight of the true common thread tying all of these together:

#Bitcoin is freedom money.
One thing I've learned from watching DeFi over the last year is that NgU tech is not unique to #bitcoin. Supply side liquidity crunches can be programmed in a few lines of Solidity.

But true monetary freedom cannot. #Bitcoin is the money chosen by people seeking to be free.
As the FUD machines spin up and market dominance wanes, I think this is very important for us to internalize. #Bitcoin guarantees its adopters that they will be free. Being free does not guarantee being rich. And if freedom is not continually fought for, it will disappear.
Read 9 tweets
15 Oct 20
So I have a lot of thoughts about this. History is definitely rhyming as we build the Internet of Value today in a similar manner to how the Internet of Communications was built from the 1970s to now. But many people are applying the wrong lessons from the past to the present!
Email (SMTP) was invented in 1982, and was the Internet's (TCP/IP) killer app for 30+ years and arguably still is. When @ChairmanHeath says "Internet" he's prob referring to HTTP, invented in 1989 by Tim Berners-Lee and popularized by the browser, the Internet's second killer app
I can't remember where I got this screenshot, apologies, but it perfectly distills what HTTP brought to the table: more media types beyond text!

Similarly, Bitcoin only transfers BTC, while Ethereum allows for many types of "value" transfer. Pattern matching to HTTP isn't crazy.
Read 11 tweets
2 Oct 20
So now that we all agree that globally available blockspace is not scalable for actual computation, but is best used for verification of off-chain computation instead, here are some thoughts on Ethereum's approach to scaling vs. Bitcoin's.

~👇~Thread~👇~
First, definitions:
1) broadcast txs: all-to-all gossip comms that succumbs to the scalability trilemma (all L1s)
2) unicast txs: 1-to-1 direct comms that occurs between two peers only (LN)
3) multicast txs: 1-to-many comms between a subset of peers (rollups, sidechains)
Both Bitcoin and Ethereum's L1 use broadcast txs. But because of (IMO) Bitcoin's use of UTXOs vs. Ethereum's use of accounts, Bitcoin has prioritized unicast txs via LN first, whereas Ethereum's initial unicast txs projects have been discarded in favor of multicast txs.
Read 20 tweets
5 May 20
0/7 I just released a new post about the Lightning Network as a utility for Web3 development. Web3 has typically been owned by the non-Bitcoin community (ETH, DOT, etc.), but I argue here that LN brings it firmly back into BTC's domain.

multicoin.capital/2020/05/05/lig…
1/7 Multicoin defines Web3 as “the unbundling of data and application logic.” Rather than focusing on storing user data on a blockchain, LN takes an incremental step towards that vision: "strong decoupling of authentication and payment logic from application logic" h/t @roasbeef Image
2/7 This is fascinating to me. Web2.0 has been dominated by freemium business models with two tiers of users:
1) free and pseudonymous if you use Tor/proxies/etc.
2) paid, giving up your identity and data ownership

This given rise to the structural problems fueling Web3 interest
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep 19
0/3 @mattshap1 and I just published "Privacy is a Feature, Not a Product"
multicoin.capital/2019/09/24/pri…
1/3 In the essay, we argue that privacy is a feature of valuable cryptocurrencies, not a product offering in and of itself. Users should not have to take balance sheet risk (e.g. by selling some BTC or ETH for ZEC) on less valuable and less secure cryptocurrencies
2/3 in order to achieve financial privacy. At the end of the essay, we study the nascent privacy pools on Bitcoin and Ethereum to evaluate if they offer sufficient privacy guarantees for most users to never need niche privacy-focused blockchains.
Read 5 tweets
19 Sep 19
As predicted, now that the summer is officially over the pace of whitepapers is picking up! Here are four new additions to the #CryptoArchives:
0/8

github.com/multicoincapit…
First, @LefKok, @dahlia_malkhi, @ittaia and Sasha Spiegelmann implemented a fully asynchronous DKG based on a novel "eventually perfect" common coin abstraction. 1/8

eprint.iacr.org/2019/1015.pdf
It's amazing how many new DKG constructions have come out in 2019. You'll find them in our Cryptographic Primitives -> Other section:
2/8

github.com/multicoincapit…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(