Social media is "killing people" ... alas it has made it cheaper for bad actors to target and manipulate people rather than encourage a society built on doing good and educating. However, mainstream has been complicit. Look at Fox News. How is that allowed to broadcast? ...
... the difficulty with "managing" social media is it also has enabled many positives i.e. Masks4All. It also challenges existing orthodoxy and power structures (European Soccer League, Meals for Kids). I don't see that happening so much with mainstream broadcasters ...
... so yes, there needs to be a Gov push towards integrity, transparency and challenge within the media. However, this has got to include mainstream. There is no way on earth that Fox News and its like should ever be allowed to exist.
But alas, this is where we get into "freedom of speech" and how you should be allowed to spread whatever views you wish - assuming you can afford it. Which is the problem, If we really were talking about freedom of speech then everyone would have an equal right to be heard ...
... but they don't. Money buys reach, it manipulates the narrative and it prevents the speech of others.
Which is why the focus should be on encouraging transparency and integrity whilst simultaneously supporting those platforms which enable democratisation of speech and diminishing those that don't.
But to really do that, the society needs to have a long discussion on the balance of the rights of Me (of individual choice often based on wealth) versus the right of We (our duty to others as a society).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Wardley

Simon Wardley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @swardley

17 Jul
X : You seem negative with this Gov and press.
Me : Dominic Grieve (former chair of the intelligence and security committee) described Boris as a ‘vacuum of integrity'. I understand the need to maintain political balance but silence on these matters is complicity in them ->
X : You're very anti-Tory!
Me : No. I'm very anti "this form" of Conservatism. I have a great deal of respect for many of the ideals presented by one nation Tories but this current lot is not that. Integrity, transparency and challenge all matter.
X : You don't think there is integrity, transparency and challenge?
Me : I think it has shifted towards manipulation, secrecy and cronyism. I do not view this as healthy for our society. I do not trust Boris.
X : May?
Me : I disagreed with May. I had more trust though.
Read 7 tweets
16 Jul
Can't remember last time I cited Fox news ... however, "42% of 90,000 UK delta cases have been vaccinated" is worth repeating. While vaccines diminish symptoms the problem is transmission will still occur which is why reducing restrictions (distancing, facemasks) is bonkers ->
Vaccines tend to resist evolutionary pressue due to prophylactic use and multiple targets. If I was going to design an experiment to increase likelihood of escape variants with therapeutic use of vaccines with few targets then mass infection would be it ...
... now, I'm not a virologist. My background was in genetics. I do not understand the reasons for #FreedomDay
Read 11 tweets
16 Jul
X : Is mapping right?
Me : It's a map (which by their nature are imperfect representations of a space) built upon a model of evolution (which by the nature of being a model is wrong). It is imperfect and wrong but it seems to be useful.
X : How do you know that?
Me : Well ...
Me : ... the hypothesis is that looking at your landscape is more useful than not looking at your landscape. That can be tested and I believe @RoserPujadas1 was looking into that. Whether the hypothesis holds or not is one we will find out over time.
X : But ...
X : ... lots of people seem to find it useful.
Me : I certainly have that impression but then I'm mindful of selection and confirmation bias. It's just annecdote at the moment, it will need a proper study to test whether mapping is useful and I can't do that being biased.
Read 17 tweets
12 Jul
X : What did you think about Branson's space flight -
Me : Honestly, the dreamers bit got me. In my dreams we swap spaceflight for the few into a world where no child goes hungry. I couldn't help but think wealth tax. Leave space to the robots.
I do have bias here though, many many years ago I sat and listened to a bunch of very wealthy individuals talk about space as the solution to climate crisis i.e. them in space. So, I'm all for industrialisation of space (i.e. launchers, ground stations, control systems etc) ...
... and I do welcome the good stuff like Carbon Mapper - carbon.nasa.gov/carbon_mapper.…, the work of Planet Labs and communication satellites in space. But humans in space, space tourism? Hmmm ... I'd rather see universal basic income first.
Read 4 tweets
12 Jul
Truly disgraceful. Marcus Rashford mural defaced -bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan… ... I hope to hear Priti Patel demand that all these individuals are chased down and imprisoned - from the booing to the defacement. For tolerance's sake these hate crimes cannot be tolerated.
X : Do you think the Gov needs to do more on social media?
Me : Be careful there. Social media is a legitimate tool of protest and communication. This Gov has shown some authoritarian tendencies especially against protest. I would look first at existing laws being applied.
However, that said, the Gov certainly needs to have shown leadership. Starmer fairly calls out Boris on this - and Lee Anderson's protest against the knee was a disgrace but then in general I find him a disgrace - mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 10 tweets
12 Jul
X : What problem?
Me : Lack of transparency. Ownership should be public.
X : The blockchain is open.
Me : Not the ownership of addresses. That's shrouded in the cloak of "privacy!" but it's far more political than that. It also perpetuates the "ethics of choice".
X : Ethics of choice?
Me : Hmmm, we are all a balance between "Me" and "We". The "Me" is all about our choice, the ethics of choice. The "We" is all about our duty to others, the ethics of care ...
... the ethics of choice like any system takes actions to perpetuate itself. Take philanthropy, it's all about financially powerful individuals making choices over who receives help but it requires there to be financially powerful individuals ...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(