they have zero hope in hell of evaluating all of the potential falsehoods in Bret’s podcasts.
I mean, I alone submitted 23 claims before they told me about the 3 per person limit.
What a shitshow.
In the meantime, somebody is offering their own $10K to do this right (see attached).
Personally, I couldn’t care less about the stupid Amazon gift cards, and I would have pointed out the very same errors if @alexandrosM would have asked me to do it.
[00:11:10] what I believe is a flaw in the drug safety system. I published this flaw. And, uh, the flaw basically amounts to the mice that are often used for things like drug safety testing and other experiments having been
accidentally evolutionarily modified by the breeding protocol that is used to produce them so that their telomeres which are these, um, repetitive sequences at the ends of chromosomes have been elongated tremendously and has, uh, has potentially very large impacts.
Effectively, these animals have a capacity to repair their tissues so that if you poison them, but you don't outright kill them, they actually have an extremely good capacity to fix themselves whereas we have a limited capacity, so they're-they're bad models.
Ok @alexandrosM, I've submitted 4 false and 6 unsupported claims stemming from just the "How to save the world" podcast. When can I expect $700 in Amazon gift cards?
[00:12:21]"Normally, when you vaccinate someone, the vaccine goes in the shoulder, and it stays in the shoulder, in-in the shoulder area." And what he discovered is that it doesn't stay in the shoulder, where we all thought it should stay
It is completely expected that a vaccine injected intramuscularly will enter the bloodstream and the lymphatic system and will thus be transported to various tissues.
No, there is no evidence that the spike protein alone is "very dangerous and cytotoxic" in concentrations even orders of magnitude higher than what is ever observed in vaccinated people. Moreover, successful clinical trials of vaccines prove that the vaccines are extremely safe.
In this thread I will collect all of my responses to B&H's key counterarguments as I heard them on their podcast #87 today:
1⃣ *Bret thinks drugs are dangerous because telomeres*
This part set the stage very well for the festival of incompetence that the podcast turned out to be. Incompetence in drug development, pharmacology, data analysis, statistics, reading comprehension and even basic biology.
Here is the relevant clip and my analysis of Bret's telomere hypothesis: