Share this page!

Yuri Deigin Profile picture
Twitter logo
17 Jul, 5 tweets, 6 min read
Ok @alexandrosM, I've submitted 4 false and 6 unsupported claims stemming from just the "How to save the world" podcast. When can I expect $700 in Amazon gift cards?

False claims:



Unsupported claims:





And now for the remaining 3 podcasts: 2 false and 11 unsupported claims. Another easy $750. Ka-ching! 🤑

False:

Unsupported:









• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Yuri Deigin

Yuri Deigin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ydeigin

Yuri Deigin Profile picture
18 Jul
The BS project is continuing to be ridiculously bad – they still haven’t made a judgment on a single submission, and it’s been almost 2 days.

Considering that they only accept submissions for just another 4 days (until 23rd), coupled with their limit of 3 submissions per person
they have zero hope in hell of evaluating all of the potential falsehoods in Bret’s podcasts.

I mean, I alone submitted 23 claims before they told me about the 3 per person limit.

What a shitshow.
In the meantime, somebody is offering their own $10K to do this right (see attached).

Personally, I couldn’t care less about the stupid Amazon gift cards, and I would have pointed out the very same errors if @alexandrosM would have asked me to do it. Image
Read 7 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
17 Jul
@BetterSkeptics #gtcentry Unsupported claim:

[00:11:10] what I believe is a flaw in the drug safety system. I published this flaw. And, uh, the flaw basically amounts to the mice that are often used for things like drug safety testing and other experiments having been
accidentally evolutionarily modified by the breeding protocol that is used to produce them so that their telomeres which are these, um, repetitive sequences at the ends of chromosomes have been elongated tremendously and has, uh, has potentially very large impacts.
Effectively, these animals have a capacity to repair their tissues so that if you poison them, but you don't outright kill them, they actually have an extremely good capacity to fix themselves whereas we have a limited capacity, so they're-they're bad models.
Read 6 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
17 Jul
@BetterSkeptics #gtcentry Falsification:

[00:23:16] Bret: We did not know that it had skipped the animal trials that might have alerted us to something really dangerous

[00:23:50] Steve: Yeah, they didn't even- they didn't even test the vaccine in itself in the animal trials.
No, the vaccines did not skip the animal trials.
Animal studies:
Read 4 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
17 Jul
@BetterSkeptics #gtcentry Falsification:

[00:12:21]"Normally, when you vaccinate someone, the vaccine goes in the shoulder, and it stays in the shoulder, in-in the shoulder area." And what he discovered is that it doesn't stay in the shoulder, where we all thought it should stay
It is completely expected that a vaccine injected intramuscularly will enter the bloodstream and the lymphatic system and will thus be transported to various tissues.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 4 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
17 Jul
@BetterSkeptics #gtcentry Falsification:

[00:13:22] But the spike protein itself, we now know is very dangerous and cytotoxic.
No, there is no evidence that the spike protein alone is "very dangerous and cytotoxic" in concentrations even orders of magnitude higher than what is ever observed in vaccinated people. Moreover, successful clinical trials of vaccines prove that the vaccines are extremely safe.
Read 5 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
13 Jul
🧵 RESPONSE THREAD TO @BretWeinstein and @HeatherEHeying Podcast #87

In this thread I will collect all of my responses to B&H's key counterarguments as I heard them on their podcast #87 today:

1⃣ *Bret thinks drugs are dangerous because telomeres*

This part set the stage very well for the festival of incompetence that the podcast turned out to be. Incompetence in drug development, pharmacology, data analysis, statistics, reading comprehension and even basic biology.
Here is the relevant clip and my analysis of Bret's telomere hypothesis:

Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @ydeigin has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @ydeigin!

Read all threads by @ydeigin

:(