Philly Dem ward comttee internal vote drama (which is very much my jam) has me noticing that (a few) ward cttees in Philly have twitter accounts. AFAIK none in the city of Pittsburgh do. Which is striking as much for what it says about twitter as for what it says about Dem cttees
You might think that a platform that skews heavily Democratic & politically engaged would be a natural fit for entrepreneurial local Democratic organizations seeking to grow. But that hasn't generally been the case: and I'm not actually saying it should be. In part it's a good
reminder of just what a non-representative slice *even of very highly engaged Democrats* twitter captures: political twitter is decades younger, way more highly formally educated, & less female than the folks who make up the Democratic action-taking base even in big fancy cities
(ok Pittsburgh *wishes* it were fancy lol)
But still on the theory that you rob banks because that's where the money is, it does seem like if you're trying to bring new people into a local Dem org, a visible social media on-ramp might be one part? so shoutout to @phila2ndward+their excellent webste phila2ndward.org
and shout out to the @AwallDems, in this as in so much more punching above their weight Image
Meanwhile of course, "trying to bring new people into a local Dem org" isn't actually what local Dem cttee insiders are necessarily aiming for at all. Bringing in new people tends to destabilize all kinds of things, leading to conflicts then shenanigans & then pushback like this: Image
There's a line of punditry concerned that progressive activists may not be pragmatic about what it takes to win elections. fwiw my observational Contrarian Hot Take is this in part reflects a Dem-side principal-agent problem, w/existing local Dem powerholders as interested agents
It's easy [see shenanigans, above] to disincentivize activists fr seeking to build via local electoral politcs. but in the long run doing the opposite & opening doors to real-world electoral effort+learning fits the interest of all: except local incumbents

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lara Putnam

Lara Putnam Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lara_putnam

17 Jul
This👇 by @ed_kilgore is both worth reading in itself, & mentions a precedent that has been on my mind, & that I've come think is important, even crucial.

We should start to recognize the anti-CRT push as the Swiftboating of youth-led antiracism. [a🧵] nymag.com/intelligencer/…
The key dynamic in the original swiftboat smear was it took something that Dems had (appropriately!) anticipated as an authentic source of strength—their candidate's record of military service in Vietnam—& made it so toxic that any effort to draw strength from it was neutralized
.@holden has been writing brilliantly re the importance of a "field of evidence" for participatory propaganda, & the insight fits more broadly. Where is the field of provocations that get spun up as "CRT" in local schoolboard after schoolboard coming from? hapgood.us/2021/06/12/par…
Read 21 tweets
8 Jul
Important new research about postcards to voters, with evidence they can backfire & *reduce* turnout among recipients. I hope national groups that have used postcards as a central part of their volunteer (& donor) recruitment read this & take it seriously
The authors suggest the postcards' focus on a down ballot race may have "distracted" recipients, causing them to ignore other sources of info about more important congressional races also on that (2018) ballot for which they otherwise would have showed up to vote.
Hmm... maybe? ImageImage
I'm more inclined to see these results as potentially in line w/fact that feeling like you "don't know enough" is one reason people choose not to vote/get involved.A postcard pitch can remind me how much I don't know, & who shd I trust, & where even start? prri.org/research/ameri… ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
26 Jun
It worries me that some otherwise smart & well-informed observers seem to believe that a meaningful portion of the actors who made the slogan/goal Defund the Police prominent, live within the progressive grant funding universe. I think that’s wrong in 2 different ways. [quick 🧵]
Who is the assumed “everyone involved” here? I think this may be a case where some of the Twitter Isn’t Real Life crowd are forgetting that Twitter Isn’t Real Life.
Out in the real world, who embraced the slogan/goal of defund the police? 1) a very diffuse array of young local activists, many stepping into public/political activism for 1st time, for whom it resonated w/their vision of what a better community would look like; 2) RW amplifiers
Read 11 tweets
24 May
A tale of two very different kinds of anti-Peduto voters👇 (As a reminder, PA has closed primaries: Tony Moreno's strength among registered Dems in the precincts where Trump did best is both unsurprising* & 👀) Image
*unsurprising because 👇
[also, apparently today is my day to retweet classic @RyanDeto articles from dawn to dusk]
pghcitypaper.com/pittsburgh/pit…
But Moreno's support in Trump-loving Pgh precincts could only carry him so far, given that nearly 4x as many mayoral votes were cast in precincts where Donald Trump got under 5% of the vote than in precincts where he cracked 50%. [Because A: it's a Dem primary, and B: Pittsburgh] Image
Read 9 tweets
24 May
This whole thread fr @cmMcConnaughy is essential, re: pitfalls to avoid in analyzing protests+politics. & this pt👇 is esp. relevant as we reach the painful milestone of one year since the murder of George Floyd, & a flood of one-year-on assessments of the protest wave begins
When I am reconstructing the past in my day job as a historian, I don't expect either the underlying drivers, or the periodization of significant socio-political shifts to be visible to the people living out & furthering those changes. Societal change just doesn't work that way
Often the shifts that most rapidly come to seem unremarkable—because they are overdetermined, reinforced by multiple converging dynamics at once—are most important.
Just because developments feel predictable doesn't mean they were predictable. This future was not always priced in
Read 15 tweets
19 May
The underlying piece here imho is a shift of political weight away from the unions that represent people who build hospitals, towards the unions that (seek to) represent people who labor in them
Health/service sector unions, w/their diverse member base & breadth of priorities that follow, are far better positioned to lead & benefit from coalitions w/the range of groups & actors newly mobilizing around racial disparities, police accountability, & more.
Also: this👇
The developers-trades-professional/managerial class alliance that's been the modal version of Democratc urban power sharing for ~30 ys had few incentives to support political *or* workplace organizing that would empower low-wage workers. That's been costly
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(