I don’t buy this. Mainly because you could take away all the mistakes the “credentialed” elites have made, just imagine they never happened, and it’s just outlandish to believe that the “Covid kookery” we’ve currently got would be less rampant in such a scenario.
Notice what I’m saying: there certainly were major missteps by elites—but they weren’t causal drivers of the right-wing kookery, nor do they justify its presence in any way.
It’s a good question. I think elite mismanagement is sometimes—like in the case of Covid—epiphenomenal to right-wing distrust. I think the elite worldview itself—mistakes or no—ensured it would be opposed by an ascendant right-wing populism. The mistakes didn’t change anything.
Covid intervention—which was always going to rely on the forms and practices of elite management (scientific expertise, bureaucratic control, discourse gatekeeping, etc.)—was inevitably going to be demagogued by the right-wing crank machine.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Berny Belvedere

Berny Belvedere Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bernybelvedere

14 Jul
As someone who has sometimes criticized anti-woke critics for appearing incapable of sizing up the "threat of wokeism" in a measured and proportionate way, I agree with Yang that the "worst excesses" response too often serves to deflect away from legitimate concerns.
Yglesias suggests a focus on "the worst excesses" of the "identity politics left" is not as fruitful as a focus on social policy and its effects. And Yang's response is to recast his focus as really important: as "attending closely to the takeover of public institutions."
Interestingly, a little over a week ago Yang had an Yglesias-like moment ("THAT'S not important, THIS is important") when he downplayed the value of focusing on the Claire Lehmann/Bret Weinstein dispute over Covid and vaccines.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
Can you appreciate how incredible it is that in this universe—right here on planet earth, in fact—a human being exists who actually thinks the United States of America is currently in the grip of a Marxist regime?
R E K T
Had to finesse her for getting my name wrong.
Read 5 tweets
11 Jul
Few world events would make me happier than to see Cuba's government toppled, its leadership imprisoned, and freedom finally come to its people.
The courage of these people.

Cuba's dictator-in-chief has warned his goons will be "fighting in the streets," ready to "give their lives" to stop the protesters. I hope they get overrun.
Solidarity with the Cuban people who are yearning to be free
Read 4 tweets
11 Jul
I don’t understand how it’s possible to have the best, most profitable domestic league and be so godawful at producing players who can touch and pass the ball. England is a horror show.
Sterling and Foden can dribble and play, but unless they’re playing some scrub ass team like Sweden, England will not be able to clear 35 or 40 percent possession.
I am rooting for England, but it’s no surprise that it’s the Guardiola players who are the only ones who can play free flowing attacking soccer.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jul
Weird flex to suggest such an affinity with an unabashed white supremacist’s program that you interpret his deplatforming as a warning you might be next.
<KKK Grand Wizard is assassinated>

<Michael Knowles>: “They are hunting us one by one.”
This is actually a core tenet of Daily Wire conservatism.

When Rush passed, Shapiro wrote an op-ed in the NYT arguing that the vitriol Rush received could've been redirected to any other conservative—in essence reducing conservatism to the antics of a flame-throwing shock jock.
Read 6 tweets
8 Jul
"If we can't agree on Twitter, then of course we won't be able to agree in real life" is a bizarre argument given that social platforms are widely believed to be guilty of artificially amplifying social conflict.
Also, "the left wants us in gulags or dead" is an interesting conclusion to draw from a leftist movement that is seeking social change via elections rather than actual revolution.
🤷‍♂️
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(