You should be terrified at the prospect of regulating “misinformation.”
The last year or so has been a crash course in how bad the powers-that-be can determine what is or isn’t misinformation.
Below, I’ve got a🧵 of 🧵’s compiling some of the most egregious examples⤵️
The best place to start is with the origin of the most consequential event in our lifetimes: the Covid pandemic.
You’ll remember that the very thought that it could’ve come from a local biolab run by a secretive autocratic regime was dismissed as a bigoted conspiracy theory.
Speaking of Russia, who can forget the supposed “Russian bounties” conspiracy theory, pushed by the entire corporate press and countless democrats, that recently fell to pieces?
For some reason, this was never described as “misinformation”
We’ll close with another “misinformation” that wasn’t. Perhaps the most consequential given it’s impact on the election was the Hunter Biden laptop story.
You may remember that the Biden campaign, the corporate press and Big Tech all pledged it was disinformation.
This is hard to read, but I beg you not to turn away. It’s a vivid, haunting story about life in Xinjiang under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party.
I know there’s been a brouhaha about The Atlantic lately but, at it’s best, it’s the most important source of reporting and conversation in the United States dating back to the days of Abraham Lincoln.
This piece honors that legacy.
We live in a time where it’s hard for anyone to think in more than seven second increments. But the evolving - and escalating - horror taking place right now in China is hard to overstate, and should be impossible to ignore.
I don’t want to wade into the ‘who can Twitter ban’ discourse but I will just say that Fuentes is what happens when a little man goes through his youth without ever getting punched in the face.
Every man should have an intuitive sense of how punchable their personality is and my hot take on DC is that it’s biggest problem is the percentage of men for whom that isn’t true.
Gonna start a DC masculinity cult where dudes go to the gym and actually lift weights, love their neighbors as themselves and don’t ever think about wearing sunglasses like Fuentes has here.
It really does confuse me that “just sue the government whenever it violates your rights” as a conservative alternative to passing better laws didn’t die with the decade (and counting) of harassment Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop have experienced. google.com/amp/s/www.chri…
Good lawyers have been enormously important to the conservative movement, esp in beating back the excesses of progressivism. But a legal approach is fundamental insufficient as the only tool of public policy.
People will frame this as legislating morality, anti-small government, whatever. But, at its root, it’s a recognition that legislatures need to legislate, and that task can be done for reasons both good and ill. We shouldn’t ignore an entire branch of government.