🧵THREAD🧵

The downfall of Michael Avenatti was obvious many miles away. Well, to everyone except the mainstream media.

With the news of Avenatti’s sentencing, I thought it was time to go down memory lane for some of the best Avenatti takes. ⤵️
We need to start this with some of the all-time greats.

Perhaps my favorite comes from @ChrisCillizza.
Now I say perhaps because these two takes from @JoyAnnReid should be etched into stone for the rest of human history.
But maybe the all-time best comes from - who else - @JRubinBlogger, who politely asked Avenatti to consider running for Congress before running for President (“I love ya, but…”)
But don’t be fooled. This wasn’t just the fangirling daydreams of a few chatty media types.

We had countless stories just like this one from @NBCNews that helped build Avenatti into a folk icon.

They have…not aged perfectly.
There were a lot of takes about how brilliant Avenatti was, so well positioned to strike at Trump, so likely to be his undoing.

This from @latimes captures the sentiment well. “Trump meets his match”
I’m…not confident this should be the takeaway, @JuliaDavisNews.
For @USATODAY, Avenatti had “cornered” the President and his team (this was around impeachment - Avenatti repeatedly said Trump wouldn’t serve out his term)
Some of the framing was…a little much.

Here, @frankrichny for @NYMag says that, despite the criticism, Avenatti is “the one media whore I can’t get enough of”
There were loving profiles in places like @nytimes.

(That also includes glowing actual coverage about Avenatti and, as we’ll get to soon, his future ambitions).
But it wasn’t just the Times who profiled him. Here’s @NPR which, as a reminder, gets a cut of your tax dollars, doing the same.
And of course the media hung on every twist and turn of the Avenatti saga.

Who can forget the fawning coverage of his presidential ambitions?

I’m not sure the idea that “Michael Avenatti’s Past Won’t Stop Him” - running for President or otherwise - has held up @TIME.
Who can forget this classic chyron from @brianstelter @ReliableSources
But @CNN pushed Avenatti hard even beyond just Stelter.

Although I will say, having Avenatti on to talk about “the news media’s credulity” is a little too on the nose, @brianstelter

Take a look: @ChrisCuomo @Acosta
This from @Slate presented without comment.
But the worst outlet had to be @MSNBC. Avenatti was a regular fixture on the outlet. They all but played comms director for him, even covering his Twitter spats with President Trump.

@maddow helped push some serious propaganda. And @AriMelber I…I don’t know what to tell you.
A few predictions & other commentary on the network haven’t exactly aged perfectly.

@JoeNBC, might you have preferred your original skepticism?

And @JonathanTurley, do you still stand by the idea that “the Michael I know would not make any allegations that he couldn’t back up”?
Some of the coverage was paparazzi-esque.

Avenatti was a media creation. And they squeezed every ounce out of him that they could - even in weird ways. @washingtonpost @Eugene_Scott @VanityFair
Again, the coverage was weird. But I think I will - in this case and in all others - dispute the suggestion that “CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin is America” @washingtonpost @AlexHortonTX
As @FreeBeacon wrote about, just @CNN and @MSNBC gave Avenatti nearly *$200 million* in free airtime in a two month window: freebeacon.com/politics/cnn-m…
A lot of reporters were obviously star struck with Avenatti - who will be spending 30 months behind bars for attempted extortion.

That includes @NicolleDWallace (I don’t think the teaching gig will happen), @chucktodd (maybe pushback would’ve been warranted?) & @atrupar
Some of the blue check takes were really…something.

@SteveSchmidtSES (“clairvoyant”)
@ananavarro (not sure this comparison held up!)
@funder
@kurteichenwald (yikes man)
There should be an enormous lesson here: the media is incredibly vulnerable to a certain variety of camera-savvy huckster who tells them what they want to hear.

The media was the mark, and boy did they get taken by Michael Avenatti.
The question now becomes: will anyone learn anything?

Alas, my hunch is no. No one has faced consequences from promoting and fawning over the fraud of Avenatti. Avenatti was good for business. And we’ll see more like him in no time.
Avenatti is the apotheosis of a character that’s been all-too-common in the Trump era: a thinly veiled fraud whom the media push because they say mean things about a Republican.

If the media hopes to build any trust with the American people, they need to stop creating Avenattis.
With the pandemic in the rearview mirror, it can be easy to forget the destruction that it caused.

Food banks have been hit hard. In your charity, if you liked the thread, a donation to Capital Area Food Bank would go a long way. capitalareafoodbank.org

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

6 Jul
It really does confuse me that “just sue the government whenever it violates your rights” as a conservative alternative to passing better laws didn’t die with the decade (and counting) of harassment Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop have experienced. google.com/amp/s/www.chri…
Good lawyers have been enormously important to the conservative movement, esp in beating back the excesses of progressivism. But a legal approach is fundamental insufficient as the only tool of public policy.
People will frame this as legislating morality, anti-small government, whatever. But, at its root, it’s a recognition that legislatures need to legislate, and that task can be done for reasons both good and ill. We shouldn’t ignore an entire branch of government.
Read 4 tweets
2 Jul
🧵Thread🧵

Vilifying people in their obituaries is, simply put, a bad, inhumane development. There’s also a lot of hypocrisy in how it’s done.

If you don’t believe me, look at how yesterday’s passing of former Secretary Donald Rumsfeld compares to Cuban butcher Fidel Castro.⤵️.
I’ll be honest. I think a lot of these don’t need much of an introduction; I trust all of you can read.

Here’s @AP. Notice anything different between the obits of a former military leader and a brutal tyrant?

Can you tell which is which?
@NPR found the space to take a dig at Rumsfeld in the headline of his obit.

For some reason, they couldn’t do the same for Fidel Castro.
Read 19 tweets
29 Jun
My collected thoughts on Jan 6th:

1. Really bad
2. Rioters should be punished under the law
3. Obviously not a ‘coup’ or coup attempt or ‘insurrection’
4. Undeserving of the attention it continues to get/overblown by left/media
5. Doesn’t tell us much about state of the country
There should be enough here to piss off most parties
I get that there’s lots of commentaries about how awful it is that people have downplayed how bad it is, but most of the takes from serious people that I think miss the mark are about extrapolating too much from a really unique and isolated incident.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
🧵THREAD🧵

A lot of media outlets are bending over backwards to avoid saying that @SenWhitehouse’s decades-long membership in and familial part-ownership (!) of an all-white beach club is racist.

Take a look at the mental gymnastics involved so far ⤵️
I want to start with @nytimes because the way they’ve handled it is emblematic of coverage broadly for two reasons:

1. They’ve mostly ignored it - so far, just a brief mention in their daily roundup
2. They’ve omitted the actual criticism from the title (“exclusive” not racist)
This “exclusive” (vs. problematic) framing is everywhere.

At a time when race/racism has dominated US media coverage, having a (Democratic) Senator as a member/his wife as a part-owner apparently makes it simply an “elite private club” instead of an all-white one to @CBSNews.
Read 19 tweets
21 Jun
Okay I assumed that WaPo video couldn’t be as bad as people were saying but I watched it and it is so much worse, to a point where I can’t even describe it. Just watch: washingtonpost.com/video/the-lily…
“White accountability groups are really helpful” this must be a spoof
“White people need to start getting together, specifically about race” no no guys I’m no expert here but I’m quite confident that this is part of the problem
Read 10 tweets
21 Jun
In the last two months, @staceyabrams has gone from calling proposed voting laws “Jim Crow in a suit and tie” to something no one ever objected to and, rather than rightly point out the gaslighting, @washingtonpost and @AaronBlake called it “an evolution”
The piece calls the new tone from Dems “a significant rhetorical concession” and I really just can’t imagine any member of the media treating this bald-faced hypocrisy the same if Abrams had an R after her name.
Abrams and the Democrats lied about voter IDs, slandered their Republican colleagues as racist, and now are backtracking because polling has - once again - shown that the American people support voter ID laws.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(