lol
All credit to this guy for pointing out but lol @ this interaction.

"Yeah that's somewhat in conflict with Bender's reporting for sure, but actually........."
So if you're keeping track, the original tweet says....
-The book excerpt said leading Dems widely supported the Soleimani strike (the excerpt say nothing of the such bc its not true)
-Matt Gaetz, unlike the libs, was against the strike (also not true)....
and then the follow-up claims Trump only did this (contra his non-interventionist mindset) bc the big bully GOP senators made him do it. As always, Trump innocent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Centrism Fan Acct 🔹

Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Wilson__Valdez

19 Jul
Look I'm too tired to argue rn (and be called a boot-licking scumbag centrist worm or w/e) but you deleted the tweets in question bc your premise was aggressively wrong & then when told so, continued to insist that your point was still right AKA typical Stancil shit.
No, I assure you 'we' think you're much, much dumber.
Anyway, it wasn't quite 2 hours (more like 3) but...nailed it.
Read 6 tweets
18 Jul
Lord, grant me the confidence of a mediocre dude who's convinced he knows everything about politics, whilst completely talking out of his ass, over and over again. Couldn't be me.
Every time someone hits him with some data or the actual reality of events that have occurred his response is always, "nuh uh. no way. You're wrong. Ackshually...All you have to do is open your eyes to see that I'm right."
Source: Just trust me, bro.
(and to be clear, I'm not referring to Dave here. Dave actually covers politics and at least knows what he's talking about most of the time, despite his proclivities)
Read 4 tweets
16 Jul
DO(ING) SOMETHING is inventing a thing that you think might/might not happen and then getting pre-emptively mad at it and declaring the Dems have (already) failed, before it even occurs.

(And then when it occurs afterwards, you can just claim that your advocacy was what did it)
Fyi, I watched the interview with Schiff. All he said was, "We don't even have the committee members set yet. The only thing we have solidified is the first hearing with the front line police. But sure, it's definitely possible we'll be hearing from people like Milley".
Like, what are you even talking about/ getting mad over? The committee hasn't even started yet. How do you know that they're 'uninterested in getting answers'...it literally hasn't happened yet. Premature failure (source: my imagination that Dems will fail to DO SOMETHING!)
Read 4 tweets
16 Jul
Hey @mtracey. Did ya see this hysterical, discredited guy? His 'analytical acuity' just pales in comparison to yours, which is always sharp & correct.
That's it. That's definitely the big story here. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who is privvy to Trump's private actions & classified info, he has nowhere near the sensible perspective as some limp-dick who claimed an 80-year old congresswoman brutalized him.
"Hey uhh all the people around Trump thought exactly the same stuff as the shitlibs were saying. Hmmm does that mean that we might have been wrong (for 4 years) and they were right? Nope, it just means everyone *but* me is totally hysterical."
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
🎯
Nailed it.
Just post after post, aggressively mocking the 'coup hysterics'. And just like with their Russia takes, 100% audaciously wrong.
Read 6 tweets
15 Jul
This whole thing is extremely funny, to me. I was just eating lunch and I saw that Politico tweet about Rodrigo being bad at parallel parking and forever reason this extremely dumb premise (the WH blowing it by not inviting Ariana Grande) just popped into my head.
I chuckled bc it was so stupid. I thought when I posted it some people would get it and others would find it believable (bc Politico publishes gossipy bullshit like that all the time). I thought it'd eventually get back to them & they'd be like, 'Uhhh no. We didnt' write that.'
But I thought it'd be a while and it'd be a pretty mild reaction. Instead, within an hour of posting, big diaper baby/editor of Politico Sam Stein was calling it 'disinformation' and summoning Twitter Support, which...I didn't really expect. I guess I should have, though.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(