(🔓) PROOF UNLOCKED: Remember when "Lost Classics of the 1960s" did "twee weekend" (which some later dubbed "the tweekend")? Well, much of this entry in the series is the opposite: historic, heavy, genre-birthing music. I hope you'll listen and subscribe! sethabramson.substack.com/p/lost-classic…
I don't think any entry in the series has covered so much ground. This entry has punk, funk, heavy metal, gospel, prog-rock, pop, twee, and the gentlest song of the 1960s. There's something for everyone here, and a song—there's always one—I bet no one reading this has ever heard.
Has there ever been yodeling in a Parliament song? Did a group of U.S. soldiers stationed in Germany shave bald spots on their heads to give birth to punk in 1965? Has a band ever made a concept album about a single game of chess? All these questions are answered with this entry.
I know it's hard to imagine a Kinks song being a "lost classic"—but remember, the band was banned from America 1964-69, so when they recorded one of their best songs and then kept it off their biggest flop album (except in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand)...it's possible.
(PS) If anyone else hears notes of Pearl Jam in Grand Funk Railroad's 1969 song "Winter and My Soul" (#7 on this list), let me know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The only reason Rand Paul is going after Dr. Fauci with what he knows is a lie—one that endangers Fauci and increases vaccine hesitancy nationwide—is because *he* knows, and *we* know, and the whole *world* knows that Paul's boss, Trump, killed hundreds of thousands with his lies
If Trump's lies about the election and the insurrection of January 6 weren't already the "Big Lie," his thousands of COVID-19 lies—which caused *exponentially* more death than his ongoing insurgency—would now be referred to as the "Big Lie," and Paul would be one of the Big Liars
I don't know when—it might be 5, 15, or 50 years from now—academics will study how many deaths can rightly be attributed to Trump's acts and omissions since 2015, and I've no doubt the figure will be in the 6 figures, with the only question being whether it'll be higher than that
Barrack is so close to Trump that—as I wrote about in the Proof trilogy—not only is he responsible for Kremlin agent Manafort being on Trump's campaign, but he linked Trump's campaign to the Emirati agent who helped the UAE interfere in 2016.
In fact, he's *so* close to Trump...
...that during the 2016-17 presidential transition, when Trump's inner circle was committing crimes with foreign actors and sealing its long course of collusion with several of them, much of the most sensitive work was actually done from Barrack's office, rather than Trump Tower.
(PS) Per prior NBC reporting, "Federal District Court Judge Randolph Moss said the range under federal guidelines [after the feds dropped 4 of 5 felony charges to enable this plea] would be between one and two years in prison."
So the defendant got 66.6% of the minimum sentence.
(PS2) I've no doubt that bases were presented to justify a score adjustment and downward departure, but it certainly doesn't look great when a judge announces an anticipated range and then severely undercuts it after the feds dropped 4 of 5 felonies to get the case to this point.
Jim Jordan is a witness in the January 6 probe due to his presence at a planning meeting for January 6 on December 21 at the White House—and his possible presence in one of the Trump war rooms pre-January 6. He should be blocked from the Committee due to his conflict of interest.
This isn't a matter of Jordan being a Trumpist or an insurrectionist. Obviously, *everyone* McCarthy picked is an insurrectionist to some degree or another, as they're loyal to an insurrectionist party.
No—this is about Jordan being a *witness*. He can't also be an investigator.
If the Democrats permit Jordan on this Committee not only will it make it impossible to call him as a witness but he will *immediately* leak any private conversations to all of the witnesses in the case linked to Trump—as well as Trump himself. He threatens the entire enterprise.
I research and teach digital culture, and track "signals" in this area. When I saw Tim Marchman's POPPING TINS 2-3 months ago—a substack *solely* about canned fish—I said to my wife, "That'll be as big as he wants it to be."
I mention this because it's become clear that, among much else, Substack is a great place for passionate experts on any subject—doesn't matter which one—to turn their obsession into an antenna for everyone worldwide who's into that thing.
And you name a thing, it has a fan base.
When I teach creative concept development—whether in the form of creative writing or app development—one of the first things I do is find out what students are expert in.
I emphasize that it doesn't matter what it is—making the perfect PB&J will do—as long as they truly love it.
(🔐) BREAKING NEWS: Trump Has Found a Way to Circumvent His Twitter Ban—and Twitter Has Done Nothing About It
This is serious. While this plot is only weeks old, it's already growing in scope. Twitter must act now. I hope you'll subscribe, read and share. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ Those of you who've followed this feed for years know that I first advocated for Trump being banned from Twitter in 2017. Not because I detested him—though I did—but because he was using the site to commit crimes (which I enumerated at the time) as well as violating other ToS.
2/ I was so linked to the proposal that Twitter ban Trump years before it finally did that I was contacted by the Washington Post for an interview on the subject hours after the ban occurred. I never imagined Twitter would let Trump evade the ban—and do so openly and notoriously.