#BombayHC bench of Justices Sambhaji Shinde and Nizamoodin Jamadar will shortly hear criminal appeals filed by @SadhviPragya_MP and #ColPurohit challenging the orders of special court dismissing their discharge applications.
Adv Shrikant Shivade for Purohit
Sr Adv Bhallu Desai for intervenor victim of the blast
SPP Sandesh Patil for NIA
Accused Sameer Kulkarni appearing in person.
Desai: This is a luxury litigation. Fix a day for physical hearing and I will come.
Shivade: In the hearing before earlier hearing, it would found that certain documents have surfaced post the orders of the special court dismissing our discharge plea. We have amended our plea.
Shivade: Thus, we have amended prayer to remit the matter back to the trial court. Let it consider these documents.
J Shinde: Mr Shivade but now trial is going on from day to day basis. They (NIA) have already examined 181 witnesses.
Shivade: But those were formal witnesses. There are enough documents to show that the sanction was illegal. Thus, we want the special court to again hear the matter on point of sanction. The special court has said it will consider at the time of trial but SC ruling says otherwise
Shivade cites Supreme Court order and states that the top court has held that sanction has to be decided at the time of discharge plea.
J Shinde: This would mean, we will have to hear the matter thoroughly. We will have to examine the correctness of the lower court order
Bench says it would hear matter physically on August 4 as there are technical glitches in the virtual hearing.
Shivade informs the bench that he won't be able to attend physical hearing due to his medical condition.
Bench agrees to hear now on point of remitting the matter.
Shivade is now reading the Supreme Court judgment wherein it has held that sanction's legality will use to be decided at the stage of discharge.
Shivade: Thus, the special Court's orders contradrict the SC ruling as it (special NIA court) has said it would decide sanction's legality at the time of final verdict. #MinistryOfDefence submitted some additional documents after the discharge plea was rejected.
From these documents, Shivade is reading out statements that state that Purohit was informing about the #Faridabad conspiracy meeting to his seniors Col Raikar and Col Pachpure
Shivade: SC has already held that no court should take cognizance of any offence allegedly committed by a public servant while discharging their official duty.
One or two more years would be wasted for trial and end of the day the special court would say sanction is needed.
Shivade: Let the matter be remanded back to the special court. If the Defence Ministry grants the sanction, I will face trial and if it doesn't then I will be discharged.
Thus, let the special court reconsider this issue. It would be like an opportunity for all the parties.
Shivade: Admittedly, both the #NIA and the #ATS haven't obtained sanction. This would set a bad precedent. In future agencies would prosecute public servants without sanction. My client has been reinstated in work. He has an outstanding career.
Shivade: I have infiltrated into all enemy organisations. Don't discharge me just because I have a good character but on facts of the case. I have gone out of my way to work for the nation.
Reads out Purohit's missions wherein he fought terrorism across the #LineOfControl
Shivade: Cites book "Unsung Heroes of Indian Army" which mentions Purohit's name. The book says I was protecting the prime minister. Cites various congratulatory letters written to Purohit by some officials and even the letter written by the then ATS chief asking him to deliver..
...lecture and share his experiences of facing terrorists in #Mizoram and his successful missions.
Infiltrating into enemy organisations isn't an easy task. What achievements I have done only my officer can say that. #BombayHC#2008MalegaonBlast
Shivade: Is this matterial not sufficient to send me back to the special court for sanction? Only my superior officers would be in a position to speak about my work. Still if they give sanction, I am ready to face the trial.
Shivade: I am not asking your Lordships to quash or set aside the special court's orders but only let it consider whether sanction is needed. If yet the special court says that these fresh documents don't make any case for seeking a sanction, I will face the trial. #BombayHC
Shivade concludes his arguments.
SPP Sandesh Patil to open arguments for NIA.
Discharge plea was rejected on grounds of merits and sanctioned under both UAPA act and CrPC. On all these grounds the special court has already rejected his discharge plea.
Patil: Purohit has directly approached this court. He had the option to approach the special court and point out the new documents that he is relying on. But he didn't do that and came here directly.
Patil: There is no need to quash or set aside the special Court's orders. Purohit can go back to the special court and draw its attention on these fresh documents.
Patil: Purohit cannot ask for setting the clock back.
Reads out orders of Supreme Court by which it granted bail to #ColPurohit. "The SC has agreed to submissions of the ASG that sanction could be decided at the stage of trial," Patil.
#BombayHC bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Girish Kulkarni to hear petition filed by adv @DhrutiMKapadia seeking door-to-door vaccination for elderly and bedridden citizens in the state. @CMOMaharashtra was asked to submit guidelines today.
@DhrutiMKapadia appearing in person.
Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni for the state.
Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh for Union govt.
Kapadia: Policy is given to me last night. It isn't useful. It looks like the Union's "Near the Home" policy.
#BombayHighCourt to hear today plea seeking permission to sacrifice at Deonar abattoir for #BakriEid
#BMC tell #BombayHighCourt they have issued circular on Monday permitting sacrifice of 300 animals per day inside Deonar abattoir for 3 days of #Bakrid
A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Girish Kulkarni of #BombayHighCourt is hearing a petition by Ratan Luth regarding delay in nomination of 12 MLCs by #Maharashtra#governor@BSKoshyari as recommended by Council of Ministers.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Anil Singh argued for #UnionGovt that Governor has "discretionary power" to nominate MLCs based on the recommendation.
CJ- But "duty" is still there (to act/speak). Can't escape from this (noimination), something has to be said.
Justice Kulkarni pointed out that Governor was expected to act "independently" devoid of any "political influence".
Justice Shinde points out that the HC bench led by him has been agreeing to the requests of Swamy right from day one to get medical attention. We are speechless outside (of the court). You (Desai) can clear the position out that we have always agreed with you.
Parliament Monsoon Session LIVE Updates: Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to move The Factoring Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2020 in Lok Sabha today