When all the industries that Greenpeace hates (i.e. all industry) are accused by Greenpeace of using the same "tactics" and "tricks", isn't it time to realise that what Greenpeace is against is democracy, debate, rule of law?
https://twitter.com/doug_parr/status/1417080395586277384
"OMFG! All these evil companies are using the same tactics!"
"What you mean, defending themselves?"
"What you mean, defending themselves?"
But unpack Greenpeace.
What are Greenpeace's tactics?
Alarmism.
Fearmongering.
Lies. Lies. lies.
Obstruction.
Harassment.
Vandalism/criminal damage.
What are Greenpeace's tactics?
Alarmism.
Fearmongering.
Lies. Lies. lies.
Obstruction.
Harassment.
Vandalism/criminal damage.
Nobody is allowed to disagree with Greenpeace.
Greenpeace doesn't want the people that green law will be imposed on to have a say about those laws.
It doesn't want the industries that will be affected by green laws to have a say.
Greenpeace doesn't want the people that green law will be imposed on to have a say about those laws.
It doesn't want the industries that will be affected by green laws to have a say.
If you disagree with Greenpeace, they will smear you, and write fake stories about how you're part of a conspiracy. They will get their idiot drones to picket your businesses and sabotage your property.
Then they hide behind 'science'.
They are a force for bad in the world.
Then they hide behind 'science'.
They are a force for bad in the world.
So when do we get to decide whether or not we want organisations like Greenpeace dominating politics, using its hundreds $millions/year budget to lobby politicians, obstructing the streets, and deciding what we may or may not use/buy/etc?
Perhaps we should take direct action?
Perhaps we should take direct action?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
