I agree that this is a good move. For once it may actually mean something so long as we aren't distracted by the usual over-sell.
(But it won't replace ODA-supported projects that have been left high and dry.)
Why is it a good move? See the document: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
(But it won't replace ODA-supported projects that have been left high and dry.)
Why is it a good move? See the document: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
https://twitter.com/AnnaJerzewska/status/1417042246260695043
But note some reservations⬇️ (based on policy concerns, not just scepticism about hype)
I'm not sure it's either/or. Preference schemes alone are not enough, but they can help.
I'm not sure it's either/or. Preference schemes alone are not enough, but they can help.
https://twitter.com/EmporersNewC/status/1417077614754377728?s=20
In the previous tweet⬆️ I actually linked to the wrong end of @EmporersNewC's thread but as serendipity would have it, it was also the correct end.
Here's the beginning⬇️
Here's the beginning⬇️
https://twitter.com/EmporersNewC/status/1417077597029244932?s=20
I see @UKLabour has criticisms ⬇️ on human rights currently for acquiring "enhanced" preferences
I'll wait to see the outcome.
This is a very difficult issue that can be turned into an excuse to be protectionist, when trade can help countries advance
I'll wait to see the outcome.
This is a very difficult issue that can be turned into an excuse to be protectionist, when trade can help countries advance
https://twitter.com/EmilyThornberry/status/1417086743862464514?s=20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
